School Board Bans Photo Of Girl Wearing Tux

Headline is linked. Story originally found at DrudgeReport.com, from local6.com web site.


School Board Bans Photo Of Girl Wearing Tux


POSTED: 10:29 pm EST February 24, 2005


GREEN COVE SPRINGS, Fla. -- After a spirited discussion over a photo of a girl wearing a tuxedo at Thursday's Clay County School Board meeting, the principal's decision to ban the picture from the Fleming Island High School yearbook stands.



Kelli Davis


Kelli Davis, 18, had her senior class photo taken in a tuxedo top and bow-tie outfit provided for boys rather than the gown-like drape and pearls provided for girls. The school's principal decided it could not appear in the yearbook because she didn't follow the dress code.
Kelli, a straight-A student with no discipline problems, is a self-proclaimed lesbian. She said she was uncomfortable to have her chest exposed in the photo.
"Because that's me, you know. That represents me. The drape does not," Davis said. "They're not accepting me, that's the whole reason we're here."
Davis denies it's about her sexual orientation, just about a student not following the rules.
"There's a dress code to follow -- a dress code expected for senior pictures in the yearbook, and she chose not to follow them. It's just that simple," Clay School Superintendent David Owens said.
More than half of the 24 people who addressed the controversy supported using Davis' picture in the yearbook, some applauding after Cindi Davis, the teen's mother, asked the board "What is so offensive about this tiny picture?"
Cindi Davis asked the school board not only to reverse the principal's decision on the photo, but to apologize for firing the yearbook editor, who voiced her support of publishing the photo.
While the board's ruling will keep the photo from appearing with other senior pictures, it will appear in the yearbook. Kelli's parents bought a two-page ad in the back of the book for $700, which will feature the picture.




Alternative link for same story:

School Board Puts End To Yearbook Controversy

By Jennifer Brice
First Coast News


CLAY COUNTY, FL -- A high school senior has grabbed the attention of the First Coast. It was standing room only as the community confronted the Clay County School Board.
It was all for Fleming High School senior Kelli Davis. The school says it will not publish her senior picture because she wore a tuxedo instead of the traditional drape.
Hundreds of people went to the school board meeting to hear her mother, Cindy Davis speak.
"What is so offensive about this picture?" she asked holding her tuxedo clad daughter's photo in her hand. "Who would have ever noticed her attire?"
The school board says the clothing breaks school tradition.
More than 25 people also approached the podium to speak out, like Clay County resident James Stewart.
"Young ladies wear one thing and young men wear something else. If you choose not to do that, you're out of line," Stewart said.
Amanda Johnson drove from Tallahassee for the meeting. She brought her senior yearbook from 1999.
"This is my yearbook from Broward County. I too appeared in a tux," she said.
Some students even showed up in tuxedos as a sign of support. But it was Superintendent David Owens who had the final word.
"My decision is that I stand by the Principal's decision. Her picture will not be in the senior yearbook," he said.
Kelli Davis says she expected the outcome.




... more at either link


Extra credit to the parents for using the paid space to make sure their daughters preferred picture is included in the Yearbook. I would hope that they used the space for more than one picture though - the one with the young lady in the tux, and another with her providing a single finger salute to the idiots that made the decision to dis-allow the picture.

Lifestyle issues such as this are not necessarily choices that I would make, but given a choice of two uniforms, the young lady choose one that some would say is more appropriate for males than females. That was her choice, and the school shouldn't be involving itself in telling her that she can't.

I know, it opens up a can of worms for a cross-dressing male student in the future. If such a student wants to wear the more female appropriate uniform for the picture, then so be it.

Worrying over stupid issues such as this, rather than worrying about keeping classrooms safe, keeping teachers teaching, and keeping students learning seems an unacceptable waste of a school principals time, as well as the school boards.

Some people obviously have sticks inserted you-know-where, and need to have them removed. This seems to be a prime example of just that.
4,265 views 18 replies
Reply #1 Top
I empathize. By my senior year, I detested wearing ties, and, in one of my rare acts of high school age rebellion, chose a bolo tie (those string ties with a sliding attachment in western wear). I got away with it (I used the justification that my chosen variation was no different than another student who chose a bowtie over a standard necktie, and won).
Reply #2 Top
What a pain in the rump issue this is. I know I know we all like free this and free that, even while giving them away almost daily, but this is pretty clear cut. Formal school pictures. Pictures which, by the way, the school is collecting for their own archives. Boys wear the tux. Girls wear the pearls. Written in stone guidelines right? There are times when you can and maybe should make a political or personal statement, but the rules and guidelines are laid out and known to all. Going against that rule then complaining about freedoms is nothing short of juvenile attention-seeking graft. Listen. I used to be what one could call a punker when I was younger. I wore outragous stuff, looking back on it now. But there's a difference between making a statement and being a pain in the arse. To me it's simple. The sign says wear this for your formals, wear it. And what the hell is with a girl wanting to dress like a guy anyways? No one sees that is kind of creepy at all? Cross dressing. Odd stuff.
Reply #3 Top
But there's a difference between making a statement and being a pain in the arse. To me it's simple. The sign says wear this for your formals, wear it.


Rules are fine, WHEN RULES MAKE SENSE. Please remember, females have worn tux tops for certain choral ensembles, this isn't any sort of "flagrant" gender bending.

What gets me the most about the public school mindset is, we are trying to teach students to be active members of a "free" society" while imprisoning them in an institutional setting with rigid structures. The REAL world isn't anything like the institutionalized drivel that is the public school system.
Reply #4 Top
This makes my high school look progressive. We were allowed to wear whatever we wanted in our Senior Pictures. Most of us had several senior pictures taken then chose which one we wanted in the yearbook. Who cares what she wears? Is it really going to make the school look bad? No. The fact that these guys are so stuck on this single tradition makes them look ridiculous.
Reply #5 Top
Without living in the area where this occured, and without really seeing the pictures of other kids in the book, I'm still left to question what the school/principal/school board does about people that have body piercings in various areas? Are those individual's pictures kept out of the Yearbook because they don't fit the "uniform" look that the school has designated?

What if someone has a Tatoo?

A hair style that is deemed inappropriate?

A fascial scar, or birth mark?

Back to my original sentiment - this was a stupid decision. The school board should have smacked down the principal for over-stepping his authority, the picture should have gone in it's normal spot in the book and everyone would have been none the wiser over the picture even being of a female instead of a male or vice versa.

Again, some people are too quick to dictate how others must live their lives.

I know I make judgements about people based on their appearance. It happens. If I see someone that looks like a "goth" I lose some respect for them. Too many piercings, especially piercings of the nose (do you really want to think about how they get the clasp on the other end of the thing???) or other such things, again, minus some points for appearance.

But with that all said, I'm not going to dictate how someone has to dress or appear. I may or may not consider it if I'm hiring someone to work with or for me, but that's my own choice. Meanwhile, for kids in school -- a place where I actually generally support a requirement that kids where uniforms -- I'm not going to tell a child that they can't have their picture in the yearbook because they choose to dress like a girl or dress like a guy when they aren't one. Especially not a high school aged child, as they certainly know the ramifications of such a decision and would likely have good (even if personal) reasons for choosing the way they have.
Reply #6 Top
Ok, so now we're supposed to believe that a high school picture = personal platform? Get over yourself girl, it's a picture! Not a picture for the newspaper, personal website, or even political or lifestyles newsletter! It's not even a picture for the general public. It's a Yearbook picture!!! 5 years from now hundreds of copies of it will enhabit the darkest, dustiest corners of the basement! Those that are lucky enough to reside on shelves will be relagated to the ones with all the other books whose spines are never cracked!

This quote from Miss Davis says it all:

"They're not accepting me, that's the whole reason we're here."


In other words, if she can't force acceptance of her lesbianism into everything she's involved in, she isn't being accepted as a person! WAH!

So, what do her enabling parents do about it. They shell out $700 to have her daughter's statement plastered, larger than life in a full page add. Ok, we get it, you're a lesbian (and apparently that is all there is to you!).
Reply #7 Top
Terpfan, really good article, but I can't say I agree with your take on it.
Again, some people are too quick to dictate how others must live their lives.


Terp, it's a picture not a "life"!! ;~D

If the Principal were telling her how she can and can't dress on her own time, to an event that had no dress code set, or even if he was telling her that lesbians can't be in the yearbook, I would see the "rights" side of this thing. However, the principal didn't. All he did was enforce a dress code... period.

There are fights worth fighting, and issues worth fighting over, but for her to whine over her picture, simply because she can't interject her lifestyle into it, is just that.... Whining!
Reply #8 Top
Are you aware that the principal fired the editor of the school paper simply for voicing support of Kelli?

Small town schools are notorious for being run by totalitarian administrators rarely abiding by their communitie's wishes.

Schools are to be run by local school boards; panels of individuals elected by the community. No vote on the decision was made however, it was simply determined by superintendent David Owen's backing of principal Sam Ward's decision (based on school "tradition" though this is it's first year of operation) that it became evident these two administrators were only trying to impose their will upon this first graduating class by not giving the decision up for a vote - one they certainly would have lost.

These two power wielders are simply stalling and attempting to block the community will which is opposite to their position and evidenced by the outpouring of support for Kelli Davis at the school board meeting.

Helix, you should research a bit more before defending tyrannical bureaucrats. This isn't about some lesbian forcing her way, it's about two school administrator's having it their way, instead of the people in the community they are supposed to serve.

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/topstories/news-article.aspx?storyid=33098
Reply #9 Top
Even tyrranical bureaucrats can be right sometimes, Deference

This has not been proven to be one of those times.

I do not think the one person involved in this should have created such a mountain out of a molehill.

Keep in mind that one person is Principal Sam Ward who heard of the "tuxedo pictures" and declared they would never make it in to the yearbook. There was / is no policy in the Fleming High Student Handbook stating what manner of dress the student's should wear for the photos. There is no merit to his and the superintendent's position. I'm a traditionalist, hell, I still wish every girl I met was still in a dress, but our American laws don't reflect wish, and in a "free society" instructing individuals what to wear / how to dress beyond a reasonable standard smacks of totalitarianism.


The editor of the school paper got fired for voicing support..okay. How forceful was the voice? Did they threaten to quit? Neither of us know exactly why

Incorrect focus. It is reported that the editor was to resign from the post of Editor for voicing support or face suspension from school. Stifling dissent, great tactic for those who invite open debate. Doesn't matter the forcefullness of the voice, that wasn't the reason for a called resignation it was that she said anything at all.


In September, accompanied by her mom, Kelli showed up at Cady & Cady studios in Mandarin to have her senior picture taken. The choice of outfit (provided by the studio) was either a black drape or a tuxedo top. As she stood watching the process, Kelli began to get an uncomfortable feeling. She watched as a girl with orange spiked hair and ear- and lip-piercings adjusted the drape low between her breasts, barely covering her nipples.
"I knew right then I couldn’t wear that drape. Even as a kid, I would never expose my chest," Kelli says with a slight smile. "So I choose the tuxedo. Hey, if it’s good enough for Sharon Stone and Sigourney Weaver, it was good enough for me."

Source:
http://roxanne.typepad.com/rantrave/2005/02/what_fresh_hell.html

Double standards? Based on what? Why would you support the Principal and Superintendent's decision to allow pictures of individuals like the former as opposed the the latter?

Everything in America nowadays has to be "MY" way or the highway and we no longer look at society as a structure but as something to bend to our will on our whims.

It's interesting you would mention that...

http://www.altweeklies.com/gyrobase/AltWeeklies/Story?oid=oid%3A143583 reports that:

More surprising than the cost of the new high school was the choice of the new principal, Sam Ward. A coach, teacher and principal at Orange Park High School for 18 years, Ward was not popular. Both parents and teachers found Ward’s uncompromising "my way or the highway" management style off-putting and rude. But he was and remains close friends with Superintendent Owens.

Hey! Looks like we've found exactly the type of person you are describing. The chummy relationship between Owens and Ward shouldn't come as a surprise either. Face it, these individuals are wrong in their motives and in their actions.

Case Closed.
Reply #10 Top
Even tyrranical bureaucrats can be right sometimes, Deference. The editor of the school paper got fired for voicing support..okay. How forceful was the voice? Did they threaten to quit? Neither of us know exactly why, Deference however both of us are very quick to make a case out of it. It's not as black and white as we've both painted it, I guess.

I do know for sure that I'm tired of everyone finding Tyrants and Bad-Men in every bush these days. As my earlier opinions voiced, right or wrong, I do not think the one person involved in this should have created such a mountain out of a molehill. Everything in America nowadays has to be "MY" way or the highway and we no longer look at society as a structure but as something to bend to our will on our whims. I feel this is yet another example of that scenario and I feel strongly about it.

I will gladly play devil's advocate in many situations, though. Sometimes it is necessary.


Okay answer this. What possible harm could the picture have caused? *My* senior picture was taken in blue jeans, t-shirt and sneakers. What this boiled down to is someone trying to enforce a dress code that I can find no reference to.
Reply #11 Top
Clay County School Board Student Handbook.

Okay, the tux doesn't violate any of the text above, however does "The Assistant Principals will determine the suitabilty of attire in question." hold any water with anyone?
If they deem the attire is unsuitable, is that not within their right?


Holds no water with me. I personally do not find a tux to be unsuitable dress.
Reply #12 Top
If they deem the attire is unsuitable, is that not within their right?

I suppose that technically they would be within their rights but there must be a good reason to back up their rather arbitrary view on things. The only "reason" "Principal Sam" gave was that Kelli's wearing the tux violated school "tradition". With the school in it's first year, he needs to fess up to his real reasons - ones that won't carry far with the community, I'm certain.