More Sour Grapes from the Democrats

from JoeUser Forums
Unbelievable as this may sound {not to me though} my favorite whipping posts
The Democratic Party comes through one more time.

I can always count on the dems to give me fuel for more blogs condemning them.

With the exception of the most kind and intelligent of dems The Right and Honorable Senator Joseph Leiberman, The rest of the MINORITY party had nothing kind to say about this historic moment in time, The free and democratic election in Iraq.

As ALWAYS the dems wanted to point out what THEY see as the right way to do things, you know your basic run and hide, leave, get out, flee, cur out, beg away plan.

Hanoi john Kerry spoke of a coming together in Iraq among the newly formed parties… this of course is a joke as Hanoi john cannot get together with his own American political machine, Bush has reached out for a coming together but as usual the dems lead by teddy {gimmee nother drinkie} Kennedy, Nancy {let me whine and complain} pelosi and of course Hanoi john Kerry have nothing good to say, as If complimenting Bush will cause those 3 to have to swallow some well deserved crow.

When will these divisionary moronic leaders of the Former Great Democratic Party get a clue?

The American people spoke last November, the Iraqi people spoke yesterday, but the Blind,deaf and Dumb. Democratic party and its so-called leaders cannot seem to get the message.

People want what My president has to offer, democracy, freedom and solutions to problems, not what the dems offer, which as we all know is another round of Bush bashing, crying, whining, complaining, punching holes where none exist.

Will someone, anyone please play the funeral march for these idiots> please?

Let Joe Leiberman take the Party over, he has good sense, smart decisions, values in line with the American peoples, while the majority of the democratic party is marching to a different tune.
politics
7,086 views 21 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top

It wont happen.  For 2 reasons. 1 - A sane rational Republican proposed it. 2 - Democrats have no tolerance for dissension.  They quash it instead of listening to it.

The Democrat version of the Titanic has sailed, and the Iceberg nears.

Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Monday, January 31, 2005It wont happen. For 2 reasons. 1 - A sane rational Republican proposed it. 2 - Democrats have no tolerance for dissension. They quash it instead of listening to it.The Democrat version of the Titanic has sailed, and the Iceberg nears.


may be we can get vanilla ice out of forced retirement to sing the new national anthem for the dems,,, Ice {berg} Ice {berg} commin baby.. bawahahahahahahahah
Siege of Centauri
Reply #3 from PolMach Forums Top
You talk of Democrats reaching out but then just call every one of them names. Who is not reaching out? Why that would be you, as you cannot accept anything said by Democrats could be truthful or on the mark. You state no Democrats are reaching out, point to an example where they are, and dismiss that with more name calling.

Who is really being dismissive?
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top

You talk of Democrats reaching out but then just call every one of them names. Who is not reaching out? Why that would be you, as you cannot accept anything said by Democrats could be truthful or on the mark. You state no Democrats are reaching out, point to an example where they are, and dismiss that with more name calling.

No Democrats are reaching out.  They have started fighting before the agenda is even on the table.

http://drguy.joeuser.com/index.asp?aid=63259

Reply #5 from PolMach Forums Top
You complain that the Democrats do nothing to unite the country, however can you give me a time when a Republican tried? I haven't heard of anyone from that party do anything with the exception of Calif. Gov. Arnold.
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply #3 By: whoman69 - 1/31/2005 1:33:57 PM
You talk of Democrats reaching out but then just call every one of them names. Who is not reaching out? Why that would be you, as you cannot accept anything said by Democrats could be truthful or on the mark. You state no Democrats are reaching out, point to an example where they are, and dismiss that with more name calling.

Who is really being dismissive?


They are. The names are being called because the democrats don't seem to want to work with the republicans.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
Will someone, anyone please play the funeral march for these idiots> please?


I have and am doing so. But I don't think it's gonna help.
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: whoman69Posted: Monday, January 31, 2005You talk of Democrats reaching out but then just call every one of them names. Who is not reaching out? Why that would be you, as you cannot accept anything said by Democrats could be truthful or on the mark. You state no Democrats are reaching out, point to an example where they are, and dismiss that with more name calling.Who is really being dismissive?


I do not think the comments from the house minority leader nancy pelosi and the comments from ted and hanoi john can be called reaching out, by any stretch of the imagination.
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: DNCdudePosted: Monday, January 31, 2005You complain that the Democrats do nothing to unite the country, however can you give me a time when a Republican tried? I haven't heard of anyone from that party do anything with the exception of Calif. Gov. Arnold.


As the victor and leader of our country said" WE {thats you and me} need to now come together for the betterment of the american people"
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Monday, January 31, 2005You talk of Democrats reaching out but then just call every one of them names. Who is not reaching out? Why that would be you, as you cannot accept anything said by Democrats could be truthful or on the mark. You state no Democrats are reaching out, point to an example where they are, and dismiss that with more name calling.No Democrats are reaching out. They have started fighting before the agenda is even on the table.


The democratic party is never going to work with MY President... just more obstructionism from them all the time complaining it's "Bushes fault"
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Monday, January 31, 2005Will someone, anyone please play the funeral march for these idiots> please?I have and am doing so. But I don't think it's gonna help.


may be if it's played backwards they can have a rebirth? I do agree with brad that we NEED at least 2 strong parties for the democratic process to work, when will the dems get it??
Reply #12 from PolMach Forums Top
As the victor and leader of our country said" WE {thats you and me} need to now come together for the betterment of the american people"

The question being has he done anything, yes apparently he said we need to come together but has he done anything to promote this? I think not, though I am waiting for the Stat of the Union, he simply hasn't stuck to what he has said as well.
Reply #13 from PolMach Forums Top
The question being has he done anything, yes apparently he said we need to come together but has he done anything to promote this? I think not, though I am waiting for the Stat of the Union, he simply hasn't stuck to what he has said as well.


He started his first term working with democrats on his agenda and got spat on. He will offer his hand again, but from the tone they are setting, it will only be bitten.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: DNCdudePosted: Monday, January 31, 2005As the victor and leader of our country said" WE {thats you and me} need to now come together for the betterment of the american people" The question being has he done anything, yes apparently he said we need to come together but has he done anything to promote this? I think not, though I am waiting for the Stat of the Union, he simply hasn't stuck to what he has said as well.


How can MY president do anything, when he tries, before he gets a word out of his mouth the leaders of the democratic party are already SAYING ,no no way, no how... The dems as the minority party needs to do the reacxhing out and following our leader, not obstructing before he even spells out new policies.
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
The dems as the minority party needs to do the reacxhing out and following our leader


I again must point out that they can't just completely follow the president no matter what. If they did, Democrats would just become Mini-Republicans. They do need to start reaching out for some middle ground, however.
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply #12 By: DNCdude - 1/31/2005 3:57:43 PM
As the victor and leader of our country said" WE {thats you and me} need to now come together for the betterment of the american people"

The question being has he done anything, yes apparently he said we need to come together but has he done anything to promote this? I think not,


And *there* are the key words.
Reply #17 from PolMach Forums Top
The problem with the Dems is that they believe the only right thing to do is oppose President Bush. They no longer hold what is best for America at interest. Therefore, when it comes voting time on laws, if the Dems keep up this mindless bigotry, the GOP will see less and less reason to be moderate. The Democrats also lack any real party platform as it is, to quote Stephen Colbert, A Coalition of the Whining. They need some major party upheaval as the last dem to alter the party platform was FDR.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: NJforeverPosted: Monday, January 31, 2005The dems as the minority party needs to do the reacxhing out and following our leaderI again must point out that they can't just completely follow the president no matter what. If they did, Democrats would just become Mini-Republicans. They do need to start reaching out for some middle ground, however.


I totally agree nj no one should blindly follow the president... but before dissenting the dems should at least HEAR what he has to propose.
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Fair and BalancedPosted: Monday, January 31, 2005The problem with the Dems is that they believe the only right thing to do is oppose President Bush. They no longer hold what is best for America at interest. Therefore, when it comes voting time on laws, if the Dems keep up this mindless bigotry, the GOP will see less and less reason to be moderate. The Democrats also lack any real party platform as it is, to quote Stephen Colbert, A Coalition of the Whining. They need some major party upheaval as the last dem to alter the party platform was FDR


From your lips{or fingers as the case is}| to The electorites ears {or eyes as the case is}
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top

I again must point out that they can't just completely follow the president no matter what. If they did, Democrats would just become Mini-Republicans. They do need to start reaching out for some middle ground, however.

You are correct.  However, instead of saying 'no way, no how, no time', they could say, yea but.....and propose compromises.  Instead the leaders have already said 'dead meat'.  Cooperation does not mean capitulation, it does mean listening first.

Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Tuesday, February 01, 2005I again must point out that they can't just completely follow the president no matter what. If they did, Democrats would just become Mini-Republicans. They do need to start reaching out for some middle ground, however.You are correct. However, instead of saying 'no way, no how, no time', they could say, yea but.....and propose compromises. Instead the leaders have already said 'dead meat'. Cooperation does not mean capitulation, it does mean listening first.


I do not want the democrats to roll over and play dead, either. They really need to start working on a middle ground with bush, this constant bickering is tearing our country apart.