Bipartisan Leaders Named to Head Panel on Tax Code Reform

From The Washington Post: Bipartisan Leaders Named to Head Panel on Tax Code Reform
By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 7, 2005; Page A04


Former senators Connie Mack (R-Fla.) and John Breaux (D-La.) will be tapped today to lead a bipartisan panel tasked to remake and simplify the unwieldy U.S. tax code, administration officials said last night.
President Bush will introduce Mack as the panel's chairman and Breaux as the panel's co-chairman, along with a detailed timetable laying out when the panel's recommendations are to be sent to Treasury Secretary John W. Snow, the officials said. In all, there will be nine members. One member is expected to be former representative Bill Frenzel (R-Minn.), now at the Brookings Institution, who served on Bush's Social Security Commission in 2001 and co-chairs the Committee for Strategic Tax Reform, an advocacy group that promotes step-by-step legislative movements toward a tax code that would no longer tax savings and investment income.
A formal executive order will lay out the scope of the Bush panel's work and give the leaders authority to hire an independent staff of economists who have already been recruited.
Breaux, who retired last year, was the consummate dealmaker on the Senate Finance Committee. He helped broker key compromises that secured passage of Bush's signature on a $1.35 trillion tax cut in 2001 and his $350 billion tax cut in 2003. Mack, who retired in 2000, formerly headed the House-Senate Joint Economic Committee.
In 2000, when Mack was a potential vice presidential pick of Bush's, an essay in the conservative National Review praised him as a lawmaker "who never met a tax cut he didn't like."
The announcement fulfills a pledge Bush made at the Republican National Convention inSeptember, when he vowed to make the tax code simpler while promoting economic growth.



Lets see how this progresses.

I like Sen. Breaux a lot, he's always been professional and bi-partisan in his work. To him, at least in my view, he's been far more concerned with the good of and for the country than what may be good for his party or for the Senate or Congress.

Meanwhile, keep an eye on the process.
1,201 views 1 replies
Reply #1 Top
The only questions that need answering are:

Income tax or National Sales Tax:

If it is National Sales tax, then there is only one question...

What percent will maximize revenues while minimizing the burdon on individual taxpayers.

If it is an Income Tax then only two questions need to be answered:

What percent flat tax will maximize revenues while minimizing the burdon on individual taxpayers? (The Laffer Curve, applied to flat tax) and

At what level of income (adjusted for local cost of living) should taxpayers have to make before they have to start paying taxes at all?

Of course, to eliminate "tax deductions" would greatly reduce the social engineering power of the Congress, so even though they aren't supposed to have any, they probably won't give them up easily. ;~D


(((ok CPAs, let's hear how important it is for us to keep a tax code so complicated that we need to hire someone to figure our taxes properly... ;~D )))