Hypocritical Senators and Congress people - signatures, ha!
from 
JoeUser Forums
JoeUser Forums
{ rant mode engaged }
(as if it's not almost always on
)
Recently I posted the following blog entry: Dress code wearing thin on air marshals, which was posted at about the same time that I fired off a complaint to my (unfortunately) duly elected Senators and Congress People -- I say unfortunately because I'm a captive of a "blue state" electorate even though we have a very sizable "red state" contingent (of which I am typically part of).
I sent my complaint very clearly and concisely, and I made use of the web sites for my Senators (Mikulski and Sarbanes) to the best of the ability of the web sites in a way that I was hoping would get the issue addressed in a timely manner.
In both cases, the web sites offer pre-selected categories -- much like the JoeUser "topic" list (which I wish would allow us to select more than one topic for articles in many cases) -- and not a simple fill in the blank "subject" type entry.
I selected "Transportation" or "Security" or the closest categories I could select, and sent a rant that looked like much like what is seen in the original article referenced earlier here.
What I got back from Sen. Sarbanes' office has me thinking that Sen. Sarbanes, and the rest of the clowns in the Senate and House of Represenatives has me convinced that these pol's are complete hypocrites on the "Rummy used an auto-pen to sign the letters of condolence" issue.
Here's a clip from the response I got from Sen. Sarbanes office via e-mail:
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 09:01
To: { e-mail address withheld }
Subject: Re: Dress code wearing thin on air marshals
Dear {terpfan1980}:
Thank you for contacting me to express your views regarding the nomination of Mr. Alberto R. Gonzales to be United States Attorney General. I appreciate having the benefit of your views on this issue.
As I am sure you are aware, the Constitution grants the President the authority to appoint his cabinet "with the Advice and Consent of the Senate." I firmly believe that the Senate's advice and consent responsibilities are some of my most important as a United States Senator.
As the head of our Nation's law enforcement community, the decisions of the Attorney General impact the lives of all Americans. You can be sure that I will carefully evaluate Mr. Gonzales' experience, integrity, and intellectual capability, as I do with all Executive Nominations considered by the Senate.
Mr. Gonzales was nominated to be Attorney General on November 10, 2004. Once this nomination is received in the United States Senate, it will be referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Should the Judiciary Committee approve this nominee, a vote on final approval would occur in the Senate. Although I am not a member of the Judiciary Committee, I will be sure to keep your views in mind in the event that the nomination of Mr. Gonzales comes before the full Senate for consideration.
Again, thank you for taking the time to get in touch with me about this important issue. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future regarding this or other matters of importance to you.
With
Thanks for contacting me, in the future please visit my web site at http://sarbanes.senate.gov rather than clicking reply.
With best regards,
Paul Sarbanes
United States Senator
Please see the subject line area that I highlighted, and then please tell my why I shouldn't call Sen. Paul Sarbanes and/or his staff a bunch of hypocrites when/if they are complaining about Sec'ty Rumsfeld.
Pot, meet kettle.
{ rant mode disengaged }
Informational note: the reply above did generate a polite, while still hostile, response that re-directed Sen. Sarbanes staff to address the original issue that I was complaining about. I still hope that issue is resolved in a manner that makes sense for the security of our nation's airline passengers (which would begin by firing the knuckleheaded director of the FAMs).
In anycase, thanks for letting me vent and yet again demonstrate the hypocrisy of our political leaders.
(as if it's not almost always on
)Recently I posted the following blog entry: Dress code wearing thin on air marshals, which was posted at about the same time that I fired off a complaint to my (unfortunately) duly elected Senators and Congress People -- I say unfortunately because I'm a captive of a "blue state" electorate even though we have a very sizable "red state" contingent (of which I am typically part of).
I sent my complaint very clearly and concisely, and I made use of the web sites for my Senators (Mikulski and Sarbanes) to the best of the ability of the web sites in a way that I was hoping would get the issue addressed in a timely manner.
In both cases, the web sites offer pre-selected categories -- much like the JoeUser "topic" list (which I wish would allow us to select more than one topic for articles in many cases) -- and not a simple fill in the blank "subject" type entry.
I selected "Transportation" or "Security" or the closest categories I could select, and sent a rant that looked like much like what is seen in the original article referenced earlier here.
What I got back from Sen. Sarbanes' office has me thinking that Sen. Sarbanes, and the rest of the clowns in the Senate and House of Represenatives has me convinced that these pol's are complete hypocrites on the "Rummy used an auto-pen to sign the letters of condolence" issue.
Here's a clip from the response I got from Sen. Sarbanes office via e-mail:
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 09:01
To: { e-mail address withheld }
Subject: Re: Dress code wearing thin on air marshals
Dear {terpfan1980}:
Thank you for contacting me to express your views regarding the nomination of Mr. Alberto R. Gonzales to be United States Attorney General. I appreciate having the benefit of your views on this issue.
As I am sure you are aware, the Constitution grants the President the authority to appoint his cabinet "with the Advice and Consent of the Senate." I firmly believe that the Senate's advice and consent responsibilities are some of my most important as a United States Senator.
As the head of our Nation's law enforcement community, the decisions of the Attorney General impact the lives of all Americans. You can be sure that I will carefully evaluate Mr. Gonzales' experience, integrity, and intellectual capability, as I do with all Executive Nominations considered by the Senate.
Mr. Gonzales was nominated to be Attorney General on November 10, 2004. Once this nomination is received in the United States Senate, it will be referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Should the Judiciary Committee approve this nominee, a vote on final approval would occur in the Senate. Although I am not a member of the Judiciary Committee, I will be sure to keep your views in mind in the event that the nomination of Mr. Gonzales comes before the full Senate for consideration.
Again, thank you for taking the time to get in touch with me about this important issue. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future regarding this or other matters of importance to you.
With
Thanks for contacting me, in the future please visit my web site at http://sarbanes.senate.gov rather than clicking reply.
With best regards,
Paul Sarbanes
United States Senator
Please see the subject line area that I highlighted, and then please tell my why I shouldn't call Sen. Paul Sarbanes and/or his staff a bunch of hypocrites when/if they are complaining about Sec'ty Rumsfeld.
Pot, meet kettle.
{ rant mode disengaged }
Informational note: the reply above did generate a polite, while still hostile, response that re-directed Sen. Sarbanes staff to address the original issue that I was complaining about. I still hope that issue is resolved in a manner that makes sense for the security of our nation's airline passengers (which would begin by firing the knuckleheaded director of the FAMs).
In anycase, thanks for letting me vent and yet again demonstrate the hypocrisy of our political leaders.