Homosexuality
What it is, and what it is not
from 
JoeUser Forums
JoeUser Forums
In Canada, a country that embraces extremely progressive social policy, there is a group of male adults known as the "Free Spirits." However, they are not as free as they'd like to be because they cannot sodomize young boys with as much freedom as they'd like. This group is a Canadian copy of NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Lover Association) here in the US. Apart from unlimited access to as many young boys' colons as possible, some of these groups' political goals are:
Younger age of sexual consent (16 in the US, 14 in Canada, 12 in the Netherlands)
The right to get married to young boys with all the advantages of marriage
Man-boy sex taught in public schools
I need not go on for anyone to grasp the absurdity of these organizations' objectives. With the dismantling of marriage that has taken place in Canada, coupled with the legitimization of the gay life style there, groups like these are finding a foothold and gaining momentum with our northern friends. What arguments could they possibly use to promote their twisted ends? Actually, they use the exact same verbiage as the homosexual movement did to legitimize itself. "Free Spirits" has postured themselves as a sexual minority, just like gays. They claim that they are born that way and that is who they are, just like gays. They claim they have absolutely no control over their weird sexual urges, just like gays; And they claim that they are special and deserve certain rights because of it, just like gays. I claim they are a bunch of twisted f***s that deserve to be locked in a room with an 800lb male gorilla that has overdosed on viagra. Why has this happened? Why have these groups begun to make political moves and gather support? It is because of the gays, and because the gay movement succeeded (in Canada) of convincing people that homosexuality is something that it is not. Homosexuality has been falsely identified as a lifestyle. It is no such thing for a number of reasons.
Homosexuality is not a life-style because it doesn't make sense biologically. One of the key aspects in our universe that defines living organisms from dead objects is the desire to reproduce. If anyone has an inclination that takes the place of, or voids, the desire to pass on one's genes for the sake of sexual gratification, or any other gratification, said inclination cannot (should not) become the standard mode of operation, otherwise that individual has lost one of the necessary defining factors to be a living organism. Homosexuality should be something that people participate in if they want to, not the way they live their lives.
The concept of a "sexual minority" cannot be legitimized. NAMBLA has already proven that the idea of someone defining them self by who they want to have sex with is not a concept limited solely to the gay population. Who is next after NAMBLA to say, "I am different and special because of what I do in the bedroom." I hate to give the typical "slippery slope" speech, but if having sex with someone of the same sex is "who someone is" and can't be helped, who's to say that having sex with young children is "who someone is" and can't be helped? Who else will start to make those claims?
Homosexuality has been sold by the gay right's movement as the main defining factor of who they are. Of all the minority groups in American, the homosexuals are the only ones that define themselves by what they do in the bedroom. The only other group that is defined by who they have sex with are sex offenders. The homosexual movement revolves very much around sex(changing the age of sexual consent in Canada from 15 to 14 was the FIRST thing the gay lobbyist accomplished; the first thing they did once they got power was raise the number of potential people they could have sex with, very telling) Most conservatives have no problem with what goes on in people's bedrooms. It is when a group of people define their very existance by who they sleep with that raises eyebrows. No one is special because of who they have sex with. If people want to have sex with people of other races, fine. If people want to get dressed up in animal costumes and have parties that look like team mascots having an orgy, fine. If people want to have sex with other people of the same sex, fine. It's when any of these people decide to get together and start a "movement," or claim they are special, that logic must come in and slap them around.
What homosexuality is, is a fetish, that's all. It's something that people like to do during sex. That's how it was treated in the 70s. People should be able to have homosexual experiences without being "gay." S&M's aren't defined as such outside of the bedroom, or dungeon, and neither are people who use elaborate sex toys, or have common group sex. The same should be for gays. Keep it in the closet, enjoy it there. Don't tell me that you're gay and it's "who you are." No it's not. Every person, gay or straight, needs to keep their sex life out of everyone else's face. People need to stop labeling homosexuality as a condition or lifestyle, but as an activity, that's it.
Younger age of sexual consent (16 in the US, 14 in Canada, 12 in the Netherlands)
The right to get married to young boys with all the advantages of marriage
Man-boy sex taught in public schools
I need not go on for anyone to grasp the absurdity of these organizations' objectives. With the dismantling of marriage that has taken place in Canada, coupled with the legitimization of the gay life style there, groups like these are finding a foothold and gaining momentum with our northern friends. What arguments could they possibly use to promote their twisted ends? Actually, they use the exact same verbiage as the homosexual movement did to legitimize itself. "Free Spirits" has postured themselves as a sexual minority, just like gays. They claim that they are born that way and that is who they are, just like gays. They claim they have absolutely no control over their weird sexual urges, just like gays; And they claim that they are special and deserve certain rights because of it, just like gays. I claim they are a bunch of twisted f***s that deserve to be locked in a room with an 800lb male gorilla that has overdosed on viagra. Why has this happened? Why have these groups begun to make political moves and gather support? It is because of the gays, and because the gay movement succeeded (in Canada) of convincing people that homosexuality is something that it is not. Homosexuality has been falsely identified as a lifestyle. It is no such thing for a number of reasons.
Homosexuality is not a life-style because it doesn't make sense biologically. One of the key aspects in our universe that defines living organisms from dead objects is the desire to reproduce. If anyone has an inclination that takes the place of, or voids, the desire to pass on one's genes for the sake of sexual gratification, or any other gratification, said inclination cannot (should not) become the standard mode of operation, otherwise that individual has lost one of the necessary defining factors to be a living organism. Homosexuality should be something that people participate in if they want to, not the way they live their lives.
The concept of a "sexual minority" cannot be legitimized. NAMBLA has already proven that the idea of someone defining them self by who they want to have sex with is not a concept limited solely to the gay population. Who is next after NAMBLA to say, "I am different and special because of what I do in the bedroom." I hate to give the typical "slippery slope" speech, but if having sex with someone of the same sex is "who someone is" and can't be helped, who's to say that having sex with young children is "who someone is" and can't be helped? Who else will start to make those claims?
Homosexuality has been sold by the gay right's movement as the main defining factor of who they are. Of all the minority groups in American, the homosexuals are the only ones that define themselves by what they do in the bedroom. The only other group that is defined by who they have sex with are sex offenders. The homosexual movement revolves very much around sex(changing the age of sexual consent in Canada from 15 to 14 was the FIRST thing the gay lobbyist accomplished; the first thing they did once they got power was raise the number of potential people they could have sex with, very telling) Most conservatives have no problem with what goes on in people's bedrooms. It is when a group of people define their very existance by who they sleep with that raises eyebrows. No one is special because of who they have sex with. If people want to have sex with people of other races, fine. If people want to get dressed up in animal costumes and have parties that look like team mascots having an orgy, fine. If people want to have sex with other people of the same sex, fine. It's when any of these people decide to get together and start a "movement," or claim they are special, that logic must come in and slap them around.
What homosexuality is, is a fetish, that's all. It's something that people like to do during sex. That's how it was treated in the 70s. People should be able to have homosexual experiences without being "gay." S&M's aren't defined as such outside of the bedroom, or dungeon, and neither are people who use elaborate sex toys, or have common group sex. The same should be for gays. Keep it in the closet, enjoy it there. Don't tell me that you're gay and it's "who you are." No it's not. Every person, gay or straight, needs to keep their sex life out of everyone else's face. People need to stop labeling homosexuality as a condition or lifestyle, but as an activity, that's it.
