Wow my first rude and weird comment

You're right Kona....but the Bootskin does well, sorta look phallic

what the heck does phallic mean? bad?

symbolic of manhood

Try http://www.webster.com/

( I would have suggested www.dict.org, but that would have been a bit, um, obvious? )

Thanks Baker. As always.

Well that's a very um "creative" comment now isn't it

Kona.......he obviously liked it......but..ewwwwwwwwww
[Message Edited]

I have no idea what you guys are seeing in the Bootskin link at the top...but you have a very vivid imagination...I see what appears to be an out of focus dragon...phallic doesn't even come to mind...

Whoa!..OK...the comment for that skin is absolutely positively inappropriate for this or any other site...that clown should be banned from here completely!



[Message Edited]

I'm with webgizmos ....... I don't see it. Comment removed.

Nothing to do with vivid imagination Your right it really is just a graphic of two dragons, I'm sure the suggestiveness of the image is purely unintentional. Advertising agencies on the other hand do it on purpose, you don't usually notice it, but it definitely sells products, Camel Cigarettes is the first to come to mind.

I prefer beer ads with chicks wrestling in a water fountain....that's my kind of ad, blatant and up front

Kona....I showed it to my wife, Psych, Human Behavior, Criminal Justice in college, she says that by just showing the two dragon heads and necks....it looks very much phallic, kind of like just showing the barrel of a gun. She suggested just using one dragon and showing more of its body to remove the symbolism. She also found the colors suggestive too, but I don't see that.

BTW seriously....nice job on your first bootskin....I haven't even come close to creating anything worthy of submitting yet

I showed it to my wife, Psych, Human Behavior, Criminal Justice in college, she says that by just showing the two dragon heads and necks....it looks very much phallic, kind of like just showing the barrel of a gun. She suggested just using one dragon and showing more of its body to remove the symbolism. She also found the colors suggestive too

Good Lord....your wife needs to see a shrink.....if that image suggests anything beyond poorly drawn dragons in red.

Freud blames his mum....I blame sheer insanity....

your wife needs to see a shrink

Ah...I see you've met my wife

Essencay..

I think I may be getting a little jaded
I don't see anything phallic at all in that...

it's actually quite a nice bootskin, considering the limitations this version of the proggy has, and also considering it's one of Kona's first.

w.d. Kona

glad my manhood dosnt look like that

thanks guys for the praise but really all i did was ask the author of the red dragon skin to turn the walls that come with the msstyles into bootskins.

And then i let digital chet help me do them. basically he did all the work although i know how.

yes Kona it is very well done...

As far as the wife of the person who left that comment goes. She made comment to her husband and he made the choice in making it public. I won't go into it, but she either needs to finish school and take some advanced courses or she needs to stop teaching that class and take some refresher advanced courses in Psychology...

Posting such a thing was totally unprofessional and not ethical when presented with the assumption that it was a professional opinion...

Jafo Fraud blamed he wee-wee and lusted his mommy and sought the answer in drugs, drinking and dreams; With the off hand rip of others ideas.

Ah...I see you've met my wife

If not then Jafo might need to make an appointment!
Kona .... we're used to you making 'rude and weird comments'..
Just joshing!

Kona .... we're used to you making 'rude and weird comments'.. Just joshing!

I would not be "me" if i didn't.

Wait a minute I have been good for awhile now... hehehe

Posting such a thing was totally unprofessional and not ethical when presented with the assumption that it was a professional opinion...

First part of your statement is correct. I am not a professional. The second part of that statement is incorrect. I did not preface my opinion by saying that I was or wasn't a professional. You read into it more than was actually there. It was only a opinion.

As far as the wife of the person who left that comment goes. She made comment to her husband and he made the choice in making it public.

This part of your statement is correct. I would also add that I asked her if I could.

I won't go into it, but she either needs to finish school and take some advanced courses or she needs to stop teaching that class and take some refresher advanced courses in Psychology...

My mistake in not being clear that she took classes in these areas when she went to college. She does not teach classes. As for why I would mention it at all, was to let Kona know what part of the ballpark my wife's coming from. If she was a drooling idiot in a straightjacket, I would have said that too. And don't worry I won't make any assumptions about your level of professionalism. It's just your opinion.

Good Lord....your wife needs to see a shrink.....if that image suggests anything beyond poorly drawn dragons in red.

I found Jafo's comment very much more appropriate than yours about my post...Straightforward and he didn't fabricate what wasn't there.

Darn, I missed the fun again.

Yes I did Essencay and I do apologize for it, I also did not realize that I was logged in under my second account.
I let my issues at the moment cloud my actions and my thinking and again I do apologize.

I also was under the assumption that I was logged in under IPlural, no it wasn't trying me tyring to hide or anything. But I also apologize for post under a different name (something I loath because that in it self seems under handed)

As far as fabricating goes, I do not think that is the case, but I did infer much and took it out of context by not reading you actual post, but seeing Jafo's comment and assuming that was part of the comment left for Konas submission. If I had I would not posted as such because number one I would have known exactly what had been said in full and also that it was not any type of attack upon Kona as such...

Again my fault, and again I do apologize to you and also to you wife...

A lot of ignroance was spent on it, all of which I own, no one else...

It won't happen again of that I am positive...

my posting days are about at their limit for a while..

anyway...

Travis had wondered why you two had the same real name.

Travis: fire up trillian, walk me through a bootskin really quick?

oaky

John....Majica/IPlural...

I appreciate the apology, Thank You and you are correct, the use of "fabricating" was too much on my part and I apologize to you John for that.

Stephen