I Keep Getting Errors

Ggggrrrr....

T Man, can you fix this?

 

If I try to put more than one image in a post, I get this error.  Forces me to add a reply for each image I put up.

 

204,677 views 45 replies
Reply #3 Top

You have exceeded the image upload limit, yet you keep posting more images? O:)  

XD <3  :*  *_*  ;P  :P  

Reply #4 Top

Yeah, if I try to put 2 images in the same post, I get the error.  And apparently, no one at WC cares to even acknowledge.

Reply #5 Top

I think all the crap that has been going on, you not being able to post 2 images is a little low on their list.

Reply #6 Top

It should at least be acknowledged. What crap?

There is always a bunch of support stuff going on. Never gonna stop.

Reply #7 Top

I meant world crap. I'm sorry, I just got done watching the news at the time and I was pissed off at a certain someone. I shouldn't have brought it here.

Reply #8 Top

I understand, Al. No problem. Thanks for the bump...lol.

Reply #9 Top

And I'll do it again

 

Reply #11 Top

I see plenty of support threads being handled. Not a peep from support here. It gets kinda frustrating after all the years I have been here, being a fairly good member.

Reply #12 Top

Soon it'll be weekend, and we know there's no response on the weekend. How about someone nudges T-man, or something...................

 

Reply #13 Top

I would imagine we have a limit of one image per post to prevent image spamming.

Reply #14 Top

Quoting Neil, reply 13

I would imagine we have a limit of one image per post to prevent image spamming.

Is that something new then ??  I made this thread in January and one of the posts a bit further down I added 5 pictures in one reply.

Skinners, need some bit of advice please. Will be posting more inquires as I get stuck.

Plus, I'm sure I seen other threads / posts with more then one picture in a post.

 

Reply #15 Top

I can post several images at once, so image spamming isn't the problem here.

Reply #16 Top

Quoting JanOscar, reply 15







I can post several images at once, so image spamming isn't the problem here.

It could be total image size.

I am not involved with the forums but I will point Pat to this post.

Reply #17 Top

Quoting Neil, reply 16

It could be total image size.
They were very small screenshots, Neil.  Thumbnails.

Reply #18 Top

Bump for monday, I will be in surgery.

 

Reply #19 Top

Jim it looks like your going to have to wait a while longer.

Reply #20 Top

Oh great. Well, we see what/who gets preference around here.  Subscriber to WC AND multiple ObjectDesktop subscriptions for over 15 years and they just throw me on the back burner...buncha crap. This post has been up plenty long enough to get at least an effort to fix it.

 

Yeah, not that big of a deal...Well, it is to me.

 

Oh well.  This pisses me off. I may get demoted, but here it is.   Since 2004, october, my first nick, I have been here, paying all the time, doing my due diligence in the forums, GIVING AWAY a gallery of over 1500 "skins".  Participating in most ALL community projects. Helping all I can.    3 seperate subscriptions to Object Desktop.  Paid all this time.  This may have to change.  It's no wonder all the old members have left.  This ain't the place it used to be.  And I may just not be around much anymore.

 

Between WC subs and ObDesktop subs, I hate to think how much I have invested in 16 years.   :'(  :typo:  #:(  

Reply #21 Top

Hello Jim,

Sorry if I don't post here but I did send in a report on your issue to Support internally. On the 25th.

Just so you know..

Thank you,

Basj,
Stardock Community Assistant

Reply #22 Top

 

Test....

If this works I suspect it's perhaps the way you're doing it...ie directly from your machine...or from a URL or something.

These are big...all searched/located on my machine.... added one at a time to the same post...before pressing 'submit'.

Like I said...if this works then it's maybe something at your end...;)

Reply #23 Top

And it worked...;)

And to take out another variable....was done on/from the 'Stardock' forum....shall repeat via WC...;)

Reply #24 Top

 

Got lazy....2 defines it as ok....via WC ...these are all big, with no input to restrain/constrain size.

Edit....there's the problem....WC has lost one.

Reply #25 Top

Now from Joe User....

Test for JU showing 2.

How 'bout dat ....JU is fine too...;)

When T-Man's back from hols I'll get him to monkey-wrench things for WC...;)

RND.....I think at the mo....just upload via Stardock, not Wincustomize.