i had a paper-hand-made star map... lost in the sea of time... sand of time... or something like that!
Dude! I had a whole binder! I marked down where to find good bio, resources, quest items. And then I drew out a map of the Quasispace coordinates and ABOUT where each one sends you into hyperspace, so I knew which Quasispace portal to hop into in case I needed to, say, head over to the Utwig/Supox in the top right, or the Slylandro in the top left, etc.
So much funnnnnnn!
I swear, that game simulated exploring the ACTUAL galaxy in such an incredible, organic way. If there's an automatic way-point system, I'm going to cry. Give me a quest that says to find a "ruby world orbiting a blue dwarf star" any day, over a way-point that pops up automatically over the exact system you need to go to. I want to EXPLORE a galaxy BEFORE the invention of Google Spacemaps that auto-calculates the quickest way to get from point A to point B....
Does anyone remember what Morrowind was like? Quests that sent you to "the southern coast of an island" or something like that, and you just had to FIND IT!! Bring that back, Stardock! Bring that back!
EXPLORATION. Not mindless waypoint following.
That being said, I fully support the auto-logging of data you've gleaned. For example: IF some birdlike race tells you a certain Mcguffin is hiding in the Orion belt, please mark the Orion belt on my map when clicking on a quest. And if said-race TELLS you it's in Delta Orionis, on moon IIa, THEN it's okay to mark that on my map. But please don't go so far as the mark exactly where on the planet the item is. I think that's what people these days will respond to.
But PLEASE keep some mystery, and some wide-open quests in there. It always bugged me in Skyrim and Fallout IV, that if you are sent to infiltrate someone's base, looking for an object - the exact waypoint of where that object is, is already mapped exactly. How on earth would you know the exact cabinet the item is in?!?!
Does that make sense? Do you guys see the distinction I'm trying to get at?