DONE with GOP

Meet the New Boss - Same as the Old Boss

Not that anyone here (or in the GOP) particularly cares, but the GOP lost one registered Republican today with the rules shenanigans at the convention.  I'll vote for Romney, but it's no longer a vote for him, rather a vote against Obama, and I'm re-registering as an Independent as soon as the local rules allow.  RINO jackwagons kicking the proverbial gift horse in the teeth.  Pure idiocy.  McCain must be so proud.

32,197 views 22 replies
Reply #1 Top

The power grab is truly embarrassing.  They've completely undermined the enthusiasm and goodwill generated by Paul Ryan's selection.  A very real chance this will be a rerun of "How to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory".

 

Reply #2 Top

What happened?

Reply #4 Top

 

with the rules shenanigans at the convention. 
End of quote

Talk radio callers this morning are feeling very similar as you Daiwa. Many talking about a 3rd party and the host was saying No, no, no....let's save the Republic first (meaning vote for Romney/Ryan) and then make changes.   

Reply #5 Top

Gary Johnson not an option?

Reply #6 Top

If forced to accept a label, I'd take Goldwater Republican, which is closer to Johnson than Boehner, that's for sure.

Quoting Jythier, reply 2
What happened?
End of Jythier's quote

What happened.

Quoting lulapilgrim, reply 4
Talk radio callers this morning are feeling very similar as you Daiwa. Many talking about a 3rd party and the host was saying No, no, no....let's save the Republic first (meaning vote for Romney/Ryan) and then make changes.
End of lulapilgrim's quote

I have my doubts about the ability of any 3rd party movement to gain sufficient traction and support to displace the RP, which is why 'fixing' the RP is probably the only real option.  Selecting Ryan was a good step, but they need to sweat a little in order for them to pay attention and become receptive to any fix.  Fewer self-identified Republicans might bring up a bead or two.  McCain, for example, who I admired greatly in years past, has become the poster-child for what is wrong with the RP and I have zero respect for him as a Senator.  If a legitimate alternative had run against him, good chance he'd have lost his last Senate primary.

Reply #7 Top

The Republican party did this so Obama could get elected again.

Reply #8 Top

Anyone notice the platform as it regards (or disregards) women passed unchanged as well.... if it doesn't matter, why do it at all, and if it does, start respecting women as people.

Reply #10 Top

Not sure I agree with Rush that the rules changes were specifically targeted at pro-life conservatives (they picked Ryan for VP, after all).  I think it's worse than that and more pervasive in disenfranchising the broad grass roots.  It embarrasses me enough to change my registration, though I'm more pro-Romney now after watching his acceptance speech.

Reply #11 Top

They will never lose me.  They never had me.  But in the final analysis, I will vote the same as you.

Reply #12 Top

Been interesting reading and listening to the various post-mortems on Romney's defeat (as opposed to Obama's victory).  Romney having received roughly a million fewer votes than McCain, I have a strong suspicion that the impact of the convention shenanigans was far greater than the RE (Republican Establishment) and media ever let on and the Tea Party folks in particular weren't busting a gut to get to the polls.  I really think that was the difference.  Particularly when you look at how narrow the margins were in big swing states.  Disenfranchising your base is not very smart politics, but then these are Republicans; maybe they overreacted to the savaging of Palin, but it was foolish just the same.  You'll never catch the Democrats attempting to disenfranchise blacks or latinos at their conventions.

Which brings me to another difference between the parties.  For Democrats, it's all identity politics and government benefits.  For Republicans, it's all about economic politics and personal freedom.

Perhaps someday, though I doubt during my remaining lifetime, principles will again cut across racial/ethnic identity and result in elections being decided on ideas and principles rather than skin color or enforced groupthink.  And I know it's not purely one or the other - but predominantly so.

Reply #13 Top

Just saw some newer 'final' vote tallies that showed Romney's at least equaled McCain's, maybe just barely exceeded it.  WSJ also said the combined vote deficit in 4 swing states was ~335,000; another 400,000 votes distributed among those 4 states & Romney would have won the EC.  That's only ~0.3% of voters.  The antics at the convention could easily have cost them that many.

Reply #14 Top

Not that anyone here (or in the GOP) particularly cares, but the GOP lost one registered Republican
End of quote
Ditto, but I am looking libertarian as opposed to independent ... considering our few options, is there much different between the two. I voted for Ron Paul as long as I could and contrary to my bitching about not voting for Romney, I did in the end.

Reply #15 Top

Quoting Daiwa, reply 12
Particularly when you look at how narrow the margins were in big swing states.
End of Daiwa's quote

I heard that in some areas of Ohio and Pennsylvania, every single vote went to Obama! That's another angle of this election that's mind boggling.  

Reply #16 Top

Yeah, well there's that. ;)

Reply #18 Top

Republicans, God bless 'em, today affirmed the wisdom of my decision to leave their clueless, gutless party after 42 years.  Not that it will matter in the long run.  I foresee one-party rule for the balance of my lifetime, during which I'll witness the final debasement of the wonderful experiment that was our Democratic Republic.  Ben Franklin was a realist and George Orwell was a very bright dude.  The future belongs to the culture of Kanye & Kim.

Reply #19 Top

For the first time in history (according to pundits) a majority of Americans do not think the next generation will be better off.  My only incredulity about the results of the survey is that they are asking "Why?"  DUH!  I think we all know why.

You do not enrich a society by making everyone poor.

Reply #20 Top

I agree with both Diawa and DrG.

Republicans, God bless em', but man o man, they've proven themselves to be nothing other than self-serving and free to design unjust laws, anti-family policies and regulations that divide, exploit and punish us.   

This Government is not to be trusted.

 

Reply #21 Top

It just gets better by the day.  Here's today's lesson in Rep Stupidity, from the PJ Tatler, on the Hurricane Sandy Relief Bill:

This relief bill is among the million or so things that make covering Washington politics maddening and tedious to cover. Politicians always do this. They load up necessary legislation with their pet projects. Others object. Knives are drawn, denunciations pour fourth, but curiously, the Democrats never get divided by their own antics. It’s always Republicans who draw themselves up into circular firing squads and start pulling triggers. Isn’t the pork in the Sandy bill ultimately Harry Reid’s fault? It’s a product of his Senate. Why aren’t King and Christie focusing their fire on Reid rather than on Boehner?

Right, because Republicans remain the stupid party, and many within the party are not really conservative at all.

End of quote

I'm no fan of Boehner, but Geez-O-Beast they could at least identify the real villain here.

Reply #22 Top

double post