Hi heaven mate.
Your list is great, but I do not agree with all the stuffs, while 1/3 of your ideas are great, (ok siege is not a new idea, but its enough) I think you are missing the bar from what makes me prefer FE to other games.

2: Dungeons and Other planes of existence: I can wonder why everyone feel the need to implement these, in warlock I think theyre weird. and usually, theyre just annoying.
I kind of liked the plane of "Myrror" in Master of Magic because it was the "High magical" version of the world, and was a similar world where you could live and stuff like that, but I feel no need to have more planes, or dungeons or stuff like that in games, usually its just another clonky feature.

3: Naval warfare: The fact that water and mountains makes 2 kind of boundaries in the game is really nice, I really like when the world makes a couple of natural chokepoints and want to see more games that do this, so few other games similar to Elemental do this in a way that cant be ignored.
Civ series: We are going to use boats to ignore the water. is a great example.
Right now there can come theoretical battles over certain chokepoints where I have to lead my armies around the mountain to get through the heavily defended border (when combat gets a little more serious)

4: Crafting: While I really liked the weapon crafting in Master of Magic, I think any item crafting that includes a random generator is a Really Bad Idea and I hope they do not include that in the game. I would still wish to be able to have more enchanted weapons, or a weapon enchanting system for heroes.

5: Independent city states: If you include this, please avoid the module used in civ 5, its terrible and both me and the ones I know that play civ 5 hates it to death -.- . Especially the point that you cant raze the cities down and create a "Perfect" land of harmony and nonsense like that

6 and 1 are spot on though, and I hope they fiddle  for tactical combat more. I really enjoyed seeing alot of cool ideas with the heroes 6 tactical combat, its just a shame that heroes 6 logs me out of my account once in a while making the game unplayable.

Sincerely
~ Kongdej

1) Sieges - ballistas could have huge armor piercing bonuses, catapults would have the splash effect upon attacking, traps could provide poisoned attack & hold unit for a turn (might have to have the assassin's tools trait?), monster pits could have monsters, moats could provide slow movement & possibly a monster or two, walls for archers to stand on or archer towers

2) Just Yes

3) Naval warfare - brings into play Islands with hidden treasures, sea monsters, 'random storms' that sink ships & all kinds of goodness

    ohh, just imagine a port battle seige vs naval

4) Crafting - Could obtain different parts of different creatures to throw in as well (some part of a troll would give a weapon/armor regeneration, part of an ogre could add strength/endurance/hit points or something and so on)

5) Independent city states - I've been pushing for all kinds of different forms of this from independents creating/growing into additional camps all linked together, to adding the negotiation ability to custom wildlands

6) Tactical stuff - & lots of it

7) Bring back tha TiTans in interesting ways, I've been promoting a couple of ways through quests & such that would add considerable panic to mid-late/late game, each of the how ever many TiTans there are would have there own 'super' trait that seperates them from the others

8) Dynasties - Marry a daughter off, obtain a permenant alliance with said faction (No more "we be blood brothers, until the clock runs out that is"), perhaps make them breakable but you gain a +5 or something to relations that would make it an extremly rare event

9) Hotseat - this is where I get others to love Elemental as much as I

A readjustment in damage calculations for army stacks.

Heavenfall, all of the above are good ideas EXCEPT for the extra planes/underground addition.

Even in the holy Master of Magic, where the additional plane was BEST implemented, it was somewhat tacked on and provided a wildly unfair advantage to the person who was able to capitalize on it.

Giant area, rich with magic-enhancing goodies, special races, and goodie huts. Difficult to gain access to, and easy to prevent access via spells or military might.

In other games, it created extra work with little payoff to use OR created a significant disadvantage for players who elected to avoid working in the other areas of play. I forget the name, but there was a 4x game devoted to mech combat that had an air and underground aspect and it was PARTICULARLY poorly implemented. Basically forced you to create three fronts of defense but still only be offensive on one.

Not saying it can't be done, but I would be VERY hesitant to include any system of this nature until absolutely ALL other significant weaknesses in the overall game design are totally resolved.

1> Seiges:  I like some of what Heaven suggests in terms of building defenses.  I'd be reluctant to add seiges if they slow play down too much.

2> Caves Dungeons:  Isn't that what Wildlands are?  Seriously though.  If adding dungeons or other planes makes the map effectively larger while keeping the memory footprint smaller, I'm for it.  But I agree with the comment above that it needs to be balanced.  In MoM, I rarely even visited the alternate plane. 

3> Naval Warfare:  I haven't really missed it.

4> Crafting:  One of the best parts of GalCivII was designing your own ships.  You can design units here, true but somehow it lacks the creativity of ship building in GCII.  Crafting magic items could be a nice touch if it is interesting and not just a time sink.  But getting the AI to use it properly so the game remains balanced...  I'm not sure how feasible that is and that has to be the biggest consideration. 

5> Independent City-States:  YES!!!

6> Tactical Stuff: I'm on the fence on this...  Right now, tactical battles are primarily designed to be quick and I think I mostly like that.  But if tactical battles are made really interesting, I might enjoy it more.  So I guess I'm saying that this one would require a philosophy change in the design. 

And Sean, I'm with you!  Larger maps please!!

Metal Fatique

Yep. That was it. Beautiful example of how great concepts can totally ruin a game that they don't fit into properly.

I suppose we should add Capitar and that other faction to the list. Maybe Capitar is planning to return by boat?

BTW ... Where is Joasoze's comment on this thread ? ... he must have the day off ... do they celebrate the 4th of July in Norway ?      ... too bad, I often enjoy his comments ... 

You have started an interesting Discussion thread, Heavenfall!  You have obviously put a lot of thought into it; and there are some interesting, and well-developed ideas in here.  Furthermore, as Kongdej pointed out (Reply #13) it is also interesting to see what other Beta-testers think about these ideas, and their variations on these ideas, and their own original ideas too.  So, this is a dandy thread, all around ...

That said, I find myself most in agreement with Seanw3's reply #9:

I would also like to be able to play on medium size maps, without late-game slowing; and I would like to be able to play on large size maps, without having Out-of-memory crashes when I try to save a late-game.  The other thing, is that I already find E:FE to be very "Feature-rich", and sometimes "Feature-unique" for a well-developed 4x game.  In other words, a lot of other things could be added; but I see relatively little need for most of them.  To take sea-movement/naval-warfare as an example, a few months ago I would still have tended to want that; but I have since come around to the view that I don't really miss it.  I think of the Elemental world as having poisoned seas (or something else), so that I just view this as an inherent part of this world - not a limitation per se, but a defining characteristic ... Also (as Kongdej again pointed out) I have come to really like the randomly-generated E:FE maps, with their frequent geographical choke-points.  They just feel like a natural (and "right") part of the ruined world that belongs in E:FE.

Okay ... I do have one feature request of my own.  I would like to have the ability to create my own maps.  I would prefer such a utility to be much like the one in Civ IV, where you can start with (randomized) templates and modify them, or create an original map entirely from scratch. 

My list would contain:

- Naval vessels. (If only trade vessels between cities with docks)
- Upgradeble forts. (Already being implemented) 
- Special resources that allows a special district (four title building) that can be upgraded to enhance the economie and maybe produce tradeble resources. Think: Silk, Cotton, Dyes (could let you further upgrade the silk and cotton industry), Jewels, Oils (Lanters oil and stuff). Something to make "special commerce cities."
-  Explorable caves where you can't see more than 3/4 sqaures in front of you. (Not another plane but a special location, think about this as a large tactical battle map.)
- Dynasties. (Duh!)
- Sieges would be nice too. (But I'd like the other things more.)
- Faction banners would be cool too. Or the possibillity of giving an overcoat to soldiers. (Giving them crest on there chests or cloacks.)
 

Well, it was pretty boring and useless. While playing Elemental: War of Magic, I never used the harbour or ships that the game had. Just so you know.  ^^

Buth then again, there where no separate continents. The AI couldn't cope with naval units.

Naval units in 4x games is a very fine line. I like them, personally, but have never seen them really well implemented due to numerous constraints.

Functionally, they are difficult to implement in a game because they complicate a lot of the inherent strategies involved in land terrain, and in doing so, the AI has a really hard time using them to their fullest effect.

Additionally, if implemented in a more limited fashion as in E:WoM, they become difficult enough to capitalize on that the investment does not even equal the reward, let alone exceed it (only on beaches?, pah). E:WoM had naval stuff way too separate from the rest of the game to make it at all compelling or useful.

Civ V does a decent job of that by making the transition from land to/from water take a turn, but it still encounters the AI which really doesn't have a great handle on how to properly exploit it.

If we can have the naval aspect of FE feel natural and be relatively well supported by the AI, go ahead and work on it, but there are enough other aspects of the game that really want attention that I would be pretty upset to see Naval stuff added instead of taking due care with polishing off the Champion trait advancement or Magic aspects of the game.

I think we're just rehashing the same ideas that have existed forever... Let's hear somebody think outside of the box and come up with something really extraordinary.