Dr Guy Dr Guy

Rampant Racism on the Left

▼

Rampant Racism on the Left

From Elected Leaders, among others

from JoeUser Forums

Many have tried to paint the Tea Party as racist, just for the simple fact that it is not proper to criticize a black president.  No such rights were given to any previous president, democrat or republican, but those who criticize Obama are called racist.  The reason is obvious.  They cannot defend his policies, so they must demean the detractors.

But in their zeal to spew their hatred, the left is coming unglued.  Their latest endeavor is "Occupy Wallstreet" (or whatever town they are in).  Their list of demands is to say the least childish, but their fervor remains intact.  So much so that Rev Sharpton is pushing them and wishing them luck.  George Soros and his outlets are supporting them.  And democratic congressman are praising them.  But what are they praising/supporting/pushing?

It seems that perhaps the gild is off the lily, as the group, besides being a bagel short of a breakfast, is also very racist. 

Then you have the self loathing type

So what does this all mean?  After all, kooks are everywhere.  But those pesky democrats think this is what passes for the "grass roots" movement.  (I guess they mean grass as in marijuana.).  And of course you have the lamest of the congressional democrats (the one that wanted to "deem" obamacare into law) calling for the revocation of voting rights for politically incorrect voting blacks..

It is so reassuring to see our defenders of freedom denying it to people who do not parrot their thoughts.  Almost makes you miss the honesty of the KKK who did not couch their racism in flowery phrases and false movements.  It reminds me of the honest thief and the dishonest one.  The honest one tells you he is going to rob you. The dishonest one tells you he is going to help you.  The end result is the same.

 

politics
55,004 views 31 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top

Quoting Smoothseas, reply 25
"I do challenge people to back up spurious allegations"

You did no such such thing.....You did the same thing SOME others do, You took the actions of a couple of individuals and try to paint an entire group with the actions of only those individuals.
End of Smoothseas's quote

The thread was that I "whined" about people posting spurious allegations.  I replied that I challenged them to back up the allegations.  You challenged me on my statement. I backed it up.  So I am not mad or angry that you decided to challenge me since that is what I do to others.  It is not hypocrisy as anyone can back up their allegations.  That does not mean I will like the proof, but I will not debate facts.  Allegations, I will challenge, facts I will not.

I am careful to back up my posts (unless pure opinion in which case I will make that clear) with facts.  That is not the case with most of the allegations I challenge, and indeed, upon being challenged, I usually hear no more about it since they cannot back up their allegations.  hence they are opinions, not facts.

Now, as far as my language, we may disagree on the wording.  Rampant is not universal.  I said rampant and I do believe it and have provided NUMEROUS examples of it (check my blog history).  You may quibble with how rampant, but I did not say it was all.  The difference I was attempting to point out here, is that the right does ostracize their loons - the left embraces them.  Again, these are general statements that exceptions can be found for.  But if you are going to allege that the right is embracing bad behavior from the Tea Party, I challenge you to find the bad behavior, and then the embracing of it.  Which is what I did here with the left.

So I refute your allegation, and stand by the evidence presented.

Reply #27 from Stardock Forums Top

  "But if you are going to allege that the right is embracing bad behavior from the Tea Party, I challenge you to find the bad behavior, and then the embracing of it.  Which is what I did here with the left."

You do nothing of the sort. You do point out "bad behavior" .  But saying that people who support the movement support those examples of bad behavior simply because they support the movement is rediculous.  You are doing exactly the same thing that was done with the Tea Party by others.

Sins of a Solar Empire II
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top

Quoting Smoothseas, reply 27
But saying that people who support the movement support those examples of bad behavior simply because they support the movement is rediculous.
End of Smoothseas's quote

No, they are supporting the movement, and NOT refuting the dirt that goes along with it.  Again, if you care to make the allegations with the Tea Party, that has bent over backwards to distance itself from the dirt, you are welcome to, and will be proved wrong.

These cretins have embraced the filth, they have not repudiated it.  Birds of a feather and all......

Reply #29 from Stardock Forums Top

"Again, if you care to make the allegations with the Tea Party"

I don't. I'm not like you who thinks if you're not on one side you're on the other.  Plain and simple I believe everyone has the right to assembly and to peacefully protest. There is always a few in a crowd that have views unlike my own, or do and say things that I don't agree with. Not publicly repudiating individuals is not embracing them, often it is simply ignoring them. 

 

If your purpose was repudiating bad behavior you would have simply done that. Instead you did something entirely different. So don't bother trying to make others believe that your purpose is something other than what it really isy because what it really is is VERY transparent.

 

Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top

Sorry you do not understand what this is all about.  I have not demanded any of the protestors be arrested or the protest be broken up.  But this is just the latest in a series of articles I read (again, I have not hidden my history of articles) demonstrating that the true racist and bigots (and yes, even gay haters) are on the left.  Theirs is not a peaceful protest (how about the 14 year old in Dallas, the heroin dealer in Philly, the love spouting clown in Dayton, or the violence in Oakland?).  If they were peaceful, this article would never be written.  But I did not include all the anti-semitism they have displayed.

So yes, I was not trying to hide what this article was about.  That you thought it was something else, perhaps you can assist me in bettering my composition skills.  But I am glad you now understand this is not about banning protestors or inciting fear.  It is about pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.

Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top

"But I am glad you now understand this is not about banning protestors or inciting fear.  It is about pointing out the hypocrisy of the left."

I've never thought it was about the above. The fact is the "true racists and bigots" as you call them are all over the political spectrum not just the left. I've seen quite a bit of racism over the years.... from people who I know put themselves on one side or the other of the political spectrum, from some that are middle of the road, and from some who I don't know well enough to know their political ideology.

 

"Theirs is not a peaceful protest"

For the most part it is. Seems to me that up to this point a vast majority of the protesters have been peacefully protesting. Like I said earlier however there are always a few who for various reasons don't follow the rules.  But as you often do you try to take the actions of a few individuals and try to apply them to a much larger group of people.

 

"It is about pointing out the hypocrisy of the left."

It is about much more than that.