DrJBHL DrJBHL

70 Law Enforcement Sites Hacked

70 Law Enforcement Sites Hacked

Well, they’re still at it…

“The group known as Anonymous said Saturday it has hacked into some 70 law enforcement websites across the southern and central United States in retaliation for arrests of its sympathizers in the U.S. and Britain.

The hacking group also claimed to have stolen 10 gigabytes of data, including emails, credit card details, and other information from local law enforcement bodies.

"We are releasing a massive amount of confidential information that is sure to (embarrass), discredit and incriminate police officers across the US," the group said in a statement, adding that it hoped the leak would "demonstrate the inherently corrupt nature of law enforcement using their own words" and "disrupt and sabotage their ability to communicate and terrorize communities."

Anonymous' claims couldn't all be immediately verified, but a review of the sites it claims to have targeted — mainly sheriffs' offices in places such as Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, and Mississippi — showed that most were unavailable or had been wiped clean of content.” (AP)- MSNBC

Apparently it’s not so easy to catch these birds.

I wonder… apart from childish, angry behavior and showing an ability to compromise some penny ante sites, do they think the pursuit of the hacker group is going to stop?

I believe it’s delusional to believe that pouring gasoline on fires extinguishes them.

105,964 views 55 replies +1 Loading…
Reply #26 Top

Quoting Scoutdog, reply 23

Quoting DrJBHL, reply 22

Well, like George Bishop Berkeley (whose Empiricist philosophy you are paraphrasing) you could always find out empirically with a matrix of [-1]... lol... I was actually thinking more along the lines of Descartes and the question of how a true skeptic can be sure he exists (the genesis of "cogito ergo sum"). I've never heard of this Berkeley fellow before, but he sounds interesting. To Wikipedia!
End of Scoutdog's quote

Rene Descartes went into his favorite bar and the bar tender asked, "Would you like your usual drink, Monsieur Descartes?" 

Descartes replied, "I think not" and promptly disappeared.


Reply #27 Top

LOL

Reply #28 Top

Just anti-establishment idealists, exercising their assumed right to bear virtual arms.

Quoting DrJBHL, reply 11

Quoting LightStar, reply 9"We are releasing a massive amount of confidential information that is sure to (embarrass), discredit and incriminate police officers across the US," the group said in a statement, adding that it hoped the leak would "demonstrate the inherently corrupt nature of law enforcement using their own words" and "disrupt and sabotage their ability to communicate and terrorize communities."

If that's their aim, then they're idiots - Illegally obtained evidence is a 4th Amendment violation and cannot be used to incriminate anyone.

The fools never even learned that much about one of the greatest, poorly understood and misused documents ever written.
End of DrJBHL's quote
These hackers will not be sitting on the prosecution for the people in question. The actual prosecution will be obtaining data that is freely available. Note that data from cablegate was considered admissible in court.

Quoting LightStar, reply 9
There are corrupt people everywhere, they call them politicians, lawyers, stock speculators (oil prices), etc.  Human greed runs deep ... not one single human being on this planet is perfect.  If they do release this information, I am sure they will alter it to fit their agenda or not release "the whole story".
End of LightStar's quote
That's not really how they operate. Idealists, remember? It gets released, full and unaltered.

Reply #29 Top

They will NEVER hack Area 51--the Illuminati will never allow it!

Reply #30 Top

Quoting Sinperium, reply 29
They will NEVER hack Area 51--the Illuminati will never allow it!
End of Sinperium's quote

 

ok so, they need to hack Illuminati then area 51   :ninja: style

 

:grin:  

Reply #31 Top

Quoting Cruxador, reply 28
That's not really how they operate. Idealists, remember? It gets released, full and unaltered.
End of Cruxador's quote

 

I seriously doubt that. If they were true Idealists, then they would not be hacking computer systems in the first place as it is an illegal activity, and illegal activities should go against their "ideals".  It makes them no better than anyone else that performs an illegal action.

Reply #32 Top

Quoting LightStar, reply 31
If they were true Idealists, then they would not be hacking computer systems in the first place as it is an illegal activity, and illegal activities should go against their "ideals". It makes them no better than anyone else that performs an illegal action.
End of LightStar's quote

Ah... but the "true believer" can rationalize anything he or she does since "The end justifies the means."

This has been the core of so many acts of savagery that it boggles the mind. The incredible ego which truly believes "I can win!" yet never does.

Reply #33 Top

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
John F. Kennedy

These hackers are far from violent but are just illegal. In their minds it is a revolt or revolution.

Reply #34 Top

Quoting myfist0, reply 33
These hackers are far from violent but are just illegal. In their minds it is a revolt or revolution.
End of myfist0's quote

The little dweebs are pathetic criminals....

A Glasgow kiss would improve them.

Reply #35 Top

Quoting myfist0, reply 33
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
John F. Kennedy

These hackers are far from violent but are just illegal. In their minds it is a revolt or revolution.
End of myfist0's quote

What are you? Psychic? I was just going to post that same quote! *_* JFK talking about to much government intrusion.

 

"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
~ Mark Twain ~

Not suggesting these guys are patriots...but then again...they could be if they went about things differently. :ninja:

Reply #36 Top

Quoting WebGizmos, reply 35
Not suggesting these guys are patriots...but then again...they could be if they went about things differently.
End of WebGizmos's quote

They could even be worthwhile human beings....if they were composted.

Reply #37 Top

XD  

..... sorry, Giz. But that was too damned funny. 

Now finish the modules, slacker!  ;)

Reply #38 Top

Quoting LightStar, reply 31

Quoting Cruxador, reply 28That's not really how they operate. Idealists, remember? It gets released, full and unaltered.

 

I seriously doubt that. If they were true Idealists, then they would not be hacking computer systems in the first place as it is an illegal activity, and illegal activities should go against their "ideals".  It makes them no better than anyone else that performs an illegal action.
End of LightStar's quote
That doesn't go against their ideals. It goes against your ideals, because your ideals don't align with theirs. They're populists, and they don't believe that moral right is defined by law.

Reply #39 Top

Quoting Cruxador, reply 38
and they don't believe that moral right is defined by law.
End of Cruxador's quote

 

Then "they" are wrong.

Reply #40 Top

Quoting LightStar, reply 39
Then "they" are wrong.
End of LightStar's quote
No, they're actually right. Laws can most definitely be wrong. Does that give us a right to break them willy-nilly? No. But legal authority is far from omniscient.

Reply #41 Top

Video taping police is becoming illegal in parts of the US and UK. So what happens when it is illegal to tape a cop beating a guy to death? Would that tape be inadmissible in court? Is that a moral law or just a law meant to protect well dressed thugs?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/feb/12/photographers-anti-terror-laws

http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/1644048/jail-photographing-police

 

Cops Beat Man For Taking Out A Camera After Witnessing Bogus Traffic Stop

 

 

Reply #42 Top

Quoting myfist0, reply 41
Video taping police is becoming illegal in parts of the US and UK. So what happens when it is illegal to tape a cop beating a guy to death? Would that tape be inadmissible in court? Is that a moral law or just a law meant to protect well dressed thugs?
End of myfist0's quote

 

Quoting myfist0, reply 41
just a law meant to protect well dressed thugs?
End of myfist0's quote

 

Reply #43 Top

I can see why they would want to do this: it protects police from being identified specifically by friends of perps so that they don't have to worry about retribution. Doesn't mean it's a good law, though. The problem of court inadmissibility is huge. Would it not be simpler to buy cops some kind of cool-looking, face-concealing visor?

Reply #44 Top

Quoting Scoutdog, reply 43
Would it not be simpler to buy cops some kind of cool-looking, face-concealing visor?
End of Scoutdog's quote

Hehe, I have a suggestion.

Reply #45 Top

Quoting DrJBHL, reply 11
If that's their aim, then they're idiots - Illegally obtained evidence is a 4th Amendment violation and cannot be used to incriminate anyone.
End of DrJBHL's quote

Sorry Doc, yes it  can.  As long as the law can show that the perpetrators were not in the employ or under the influence of any government agency, it can be used to nail crooks.  That is why blackmail is so successful.

Reply #46 Top

It's rather difficult to prove that, Dr Guy.

Reply #47 Top

Quoting Jafo, reply 34
The little dweebs are pathetic criminals....

A Glasgow kiss would improve them.
End of Jafo's quote

As may be the case... but just as criminal. 

Assault is not the preferred method of resolving issues and is not politically correct... though it should be for bankers.

Anyhow, back to the law enforcement hacking!  I wonder if these blokes 'd kindly remove my records?

Apparently I still have 2 counts of public drunkenness, 1 count of public nudity [went skinny dipping in a Brisbane City fountain] and several counts of willful destruction of police property ...

Yeah, I apparently slashed a couple of coppers uniforms with my cutlass when they tried to arrest me for skinny dipping in the fountain while drunk.

So, I would like those records removed seeing as the coppers won't expunge them.

 

 

 

Besides, I can't see how they can call it public nudity... I was wearing an eye patch and me pirate hat. :w00t:

Reply #48 Top

Quoting starkers, reply 47
Besides, I can't see how they can call it public nudity... I was wearing an eye patch and me pirate hat.
End of starkers's quote

That's right! The nerve of the blackguards!

Why, is nothing sacred anymore? Sheesh!

Reply #49 Top

Quoting DrJBHL, reply 48
Why, is nothing sacred anymore?
End of DrJBHL's quote

Nope, nothing is sacred anymore.  I'd blame Skinhit but I know that he holds to the highest standards when it comes to being a pirate, wearing eye patches and public nudity, so I'll blame Zubaz.

:w00t:

Reply #50 Top

MSNBC (the reporting network of record here) is the laughing stock of all major news networks. 

I would easily believe that I (not a member of the actual hacking group Anonymous) could send MSNBC an email claiming to be a member and tell them that story, and they would run with it... just so they have something to talk about.  What a laugh to be had at their expense, ****ing morons.

C'mon really?  MSNBC has no credibility.