kona0197 kona0197

Keep it or trash it?

Keep it or trash it?

I bought a notebook second hand the other day off of CL. I was not informed it was broke. So take a look at the picture and tell me if you would trash the machine or not. The machine is still under warranty yet Acer will not fix it unless I pay them almost $300 dollars. The damage does not effect the machine's use except I thiunk the SD card reader is not working.

Thoughts?

 

66,651 views 35 replies
Reply #26 Top

Quoting kona0197, reply 22
No I don't have a legit copy of 7. The one I have is a copy of a friends so I really don't want to use it. This machine gets a 4.5 score with Vista. I have 3 GB RAM. Is Vista really that bad or what should I do?
End of kona0197's quote

 

DON"T steal   A.K.A. pirate

Reply #27 Top

Quoting kona0197, reply 22
Is Vista really that bad
End of kona0197's quote

No, Vista is not that bad.  Just because a few journalist and armchair experts said so early in the piece, don't make it so.  I currently have Vista Home Premium SP3 running on this rig in a dual boot configuration with Win 7, and I can honestly say that I can hardly tell the difference, performance-wise. 

Besides, why run the risk of using a pirated copy of Win 7?  Apart from the zero tolerance thingy that Jafo alluded to, I read a few days ago that law enforcement in the US has been visiting the homes of people and seizing machines that MS detected as running illegitimate copies of Windows and Office. 

 

Reply #28 Top

Quoting starkers, reply 27
Besides, why run the risk of using a pirated copy of Win 7?
End of starkers's quote

Vista is better than a pirated copy of Windows 7. (If you can't say something nice about an OS, do not say anything at all).

And that is all I have to say about Vista.

Reply #29 Top

Vista :X I'd rather go down a razor filled slide naked

Reply #30 Top

Quoting Dr, reply 28
Vista is better than a pirated copy of Windows 7. (If you can't say something nice about an OS, do not say anything at all).
End of Dr's quote

I've been running Vista since the first public beta and I have never found it to be the pig some people claim it to be, and thus have nothing bad to say about it.  In fact, I quite like using it... especially in 64 bit and the way I have it set up to suit myself.  I'm using Tweak Vista to eliminate the annoying quirks of UAC, for example], and for me it is more than just usable. As stated above, I found little or no difference in performance  between Vista and Win 7 on this machine... though I'd say the recent addition of a SSD would have upped the performance of Win 7 somewhat.

Why dual boot between Vista and Win 7?  I like to  keep Vista on my rig for MS Office, Photoshop, PSP and other art/photo manipulation programs, and Win 7 for music and video editing, etc.  Hence I've not bloated either OS with too many programs all at once and therefore keep a sleek fast machine with fewer registry nightmares.

|-)

Reply #31 Top

Agreed with Starkers. I found Vista to be a big jump over XP, and 7 to be only a small improvement over Vista.

 

:fox:

Reply #32 Top

Quoting tazgecko, reply 29
Vista I'd rather go down a razor filled slide naked
End of tazgecko's quote
You´re funny |-)

Reply #33 Top

Well I ended up back with the Acer due to issues with the HP. No big deal I guess. Sooner or later I will get a newer notebook.

Reply #34 Top

Quoting Kitkun, reply 31
Agreed with Starkers. I found Vista to be a big jump over XP, and 7 to be only a small improvement over Vista.
End of Kitkun's quote

It is (a big jump) and so is 7 (a minor bump).  7 is Vista with the bug fixes.  I used Vista for 18 months and am not sorry to see it go (just upgraded to 7 last month).  The difference is very refreshing.

Reply #35 Top

Personally, my only complaint with vista was the 2gb ram usage.  I like both OS' other than that.

-Twilight Storm