JoeUser Malicious?

Just a question, FYI type thing.  Several people told me when they google my articles Tova7 Remind Me)..or try a link with the forum addy in it they get this:

Remind Me. » Forum Post by Tova7

Suspicious results and strange behavior: Results labeled 'This site may harm your computer'

We want our users to feel safe when they search the web, and we're continuously working to identify dangerous sites and increase protection for our users. This warning message appears with search results we've identified as sites that may install malicious software on your computer:

Malware warning

If you click the title of the result, you'll be shown the following warning rather than being taken immediately to the webpage in question:

So I'm wondering if Stardock knows Google has identified the JoeUser forums as harmful?  Is it just JU or all Stardocks sites?  Might this affect traffic?

Just checkin......

90,463 views 43 replies
Reply #1 Top

I get an Avast warning from time to time when enterring the JU forums. Malicious url(livertip) I just ignore it, as I can navigate the forums with no trouble. It is my belief that if any Stardock site was indeed "dangerous" the SD web team would be all over it. Google needs to get its act together.

And they(Google) want people to trust them enough to use an OS built by them? I don't think so!

Reply #2 Top

Yeah.... Google scans the internet and when it finds a site that it believes to be delivering virus or malware it blocks it as "malicious" IE users generally aren't affected. The Joeuser forum page is off limits to Firefox and Chrome and will present the user with a warning page. Its probably just a flash ad that Google is flagging,  Unless the majority of their users are IE the traffic here will nosedive into oblivion

Reply #3 Top

Wait a minute, are you folks talking about the site or the people there?  :-"  :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Reply #4 Top

Quoting Philly0381, reply 3
Wait a minute, are you folks talking about the site or the people there?   

Yes.;)

Reply #5 Top

Has to do with the way Google "sees" the code on the page. Also, Norton sees WC cookies as trackers of low danger.

Bara says they'll do something about it with Google.

BTW, Tova7... I do hope you're doing better, and feeling stronger...you've been in my thoughts.

Reply #6 Top

Bara says they'll do something about it with Google.

Awesome.  I wasn't sure if they were aware.

BTW, Tova7... I do hope you're doing better, and feeling stronger...you've been in my thoughts.

Thanks.  I'm right as rain as of today...but I still have my boob and haven't started chemo yet...looks like mid to late October for surgery, then chemo....

Reply #7 Top

And they(Google) want people to trust them enough to use an OS built by them? I don't think so!

Trust Google???  I'd rather put my hand in a nest of scorpions. :-"

 

Reply #8 Top

Quoting Tova7, reply 6
Bara says they'll do something about it with Google.

Awesome.  I wasn't sure if they were aware.

BTW, Tova7... I do hope you're doing better, and feeling stronger...you've been in my thoughts.
Thanks.  I'm right as rain as of today...but I still have my boob and haven't started chemo yet...looks like mid to late October for surgery, then chemo....

All my prayers go with you, girl.

Reply #9 Top

Quoting starkers, reply 7
And they(Google) want people to trust them enough to use an OS built by them? I don't think so!

Trust Google???  I'd rather put my hand in a nest of scorpions.

 

Right you are there, mate. A little 'chop' for you! ;) Happy Sunday!

Reply #10 Top

Hehe, Doc, that's a good 'un........ good, but sadly true, so sadly true.

People might think Google has taken over the internet, but it goes much, much further than that.   Most believed it was just an April Fools joke when Google posted that thing about free internet connections by placing the provided cable down one's toilet, but that's what they wanted everyone to think, while they covertly plotted away in sewers underneath cities all over the world.  You see, they didn't just want satellites to spy on us from above, they also wanted to spy on us from below. 

So yeah, heed the warning, and check things out thoroughly before you sit on the toot.... they might be watching. *_*

Oh and don't think the S-bend will stop 'em... they've got sophisticated technology to get around that. :rolleyes:

Reply #11 Top

Trust Google??? I'd rather put my hand in a nest of scorpions.

Scorpions have nest? Do they lay eggs too? :grin:

 

Reply #12 Top

Quoting CharlesCS, reply 11
Trust Google??? I'd rather put my hand in a nest of scorpions.

Scorpions have nest? Do they lay eggs too?

 

Yes. Also wings. Now we're really screwed.

Reply #13 Top

I have seen the same thing, Firefox not wanting to load the page. Easy enough to fix in your browser but I think Brad needs to have a chat with Google and fix the nonsense.

Reply #14 Top

Easy enough to fix in your browser but I think Brad needs to have a chat with Google and fix the nonsense.

That's for sure.... disengaging the 'Block Reported Attack Sites' could leave one vulnerable if one forgot to turn it back on prior to going elsewhere.

Reply #15 Top

We are still working to try and fix it with Google, but contacting them is like contacting someone on Mars.

My suggestion....

Use Bing.

 

Reply #16 Top

Quoting starkers, reply 7
Trust Google???  I'd rather put my hand in a nest of scorpions.

I detect some animosity there. ;)

Reply #17 Top

Quoting Island, reply 15
We are still working to try and fix it with Google, but contacting them is like contacting someone on Mars.

My suggestion....

Use Bing.

Without a government mandated monopoly (patent or copyright), all Monopolies fail.  I suspect Google just fiddled their dominance away.  Not that they will not be a factor, but Bing will become a major player as these episodes continue to multiply instead of disappear.

Reply #18 Top

I detect some animosity there.

Really???  Who me???   Do I really sound as anti-Google as That??? :rofl:

Actually, I'm sorta expecting a cease and desist letter from Google or its lawyer for all the derogatory stuff I keep saying about it.

Hehe, they're gonna have to do a darned fine job of scaring the bejesus out of me tho.... cos it has become like a sport to me... bad-mouthing Google, that is.

Without a government mandated monopoly (patent or copyright), all Monopolies fail. I suspect Google just fiddled their dominance away.

It can't happen soon enough for me.... I'd love to see Google fiddle itself into oblivion, thou I'd have to find a new target to besmirch and denigrate.  

Hmmm, I wonder if Yahoo have thick enough skins to cop it for a while. :grin:

Reply #19 Top

We are still working to try and fix it with Google, but contacting them is like contacting someone on Mars.

My suggestion....

Use Bing.

I don't know that it's just Google....my Norton gives me this everytime I hit the forums....

 

Norton Rating

WARNING


livertip.com
Summary
Computer Threats:   9
Identity Threats:   0
Annoyance factors:   0
     
Total threats on this site:   9
     
Community Reviews:   0

The Norton rating is a result of Symantec's automated analysis system. Learn more.
The opinions of our users are reflected separately in the community rating on the right.
General Info
Web Site Location     Germany

Norton Safe Web has analyzed livertip.com for safety and security problems. Below is a sample of the threats that were found.
livertip.com

Threat Report

Total threats found: 9


Small-whitebg-red Viruses (what's this?)

Threats found: 5
Here is a complete list: (for more information about a specific threat, click on the Threat Name below)

Threat Name: Downloader
Location: http://livertip.com/new/tmp/des.jar


Threat Name: Trojan Horse
Location: http://livertip.com/new/tmp/des.jar


Threat Name: Direct link to Downloader
Location: http://livertip.com/new/index.php?s=IBB@C


Threat Name: Direct link to Downloader
Location: http://livertip.com/new/index.php?s=IBBCC&r=1


Threat Name: Direct link to Downloader
Location: http://livertip.com/new/index.php?s=IBBBA&r=1


Small-whitebg-red Security Risks (what's this?)

Threats found: 4
Here is a complete list: (for more information about a specific threat, click on the Threat Name below)

Threat Name: HTTP Phoenix Malicious Toolkit Activity
Location: http://livertip.com/new/index.php?s=IBB@C


Threat Name: HTTP Phoenix Malicious Toolkit Activity
Location: http://livertip.com/new/index.php?s=IBBEG


Threat Name: HTTP Phoenix Malicious Toolkit Activity
Location: http://livertip.com/new/index.php?s=IBBCC&r=1


Threat Name: HTTP Phoenix Malicious Toolkit Activity
Location: http://livertip.com/new/index.php?s=IBBBA&r=1

 

 

Reply #20 Top

When I go here: https://forums.joeuser.com/   

I get this:

 I just close the warning, and then continue on to the forums but it's getting damned annoying.>:(

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reply #21 Top

Actually, I'm sorta expecting a cease and desist letter from Google or its lawyer for all the derogatory stuff I keep saying about it.

I saw a process server heading to  your door. ;)

Reply #22 Top

Quoting Tova7, reply 19

I don't know that it's just Google....my Norton gives me this everytime I hit the forums....

Like Firefox, Norton is getting it from Google.  Kind of like email and blacklisting.  Not every ISP (and most do not) have a list of sites that they will not accept mail from.  instead, they use 3rd parties that track the bad domains.  Firefox and Norton use a 3rd party - in this case Google.

And where the catch 22 comes from.  if Gunslingerbara is correct, the flagging came from Google Ads!  Nice little monopoly there for Google.  Create the problem and then charge to fix it (since they have not, I am sure greasing of their palm will speed up their response to the inquiries ;) )

Reply #24 Top

Actually, I'm sorta expecting a cease and desist letter from Google or its lawyer for all the derogatory stuff I keep saying about it.

I saw a process server heading to your door.

Ah, so that's what that bloke was doing here yesterday??   Yeah, he had a little accident.... got his nose slammed shut in the sliding door.  Hmmm, don't think we'll be seeing him again for a while...

I hear nose re-attachments take a while to heal :rofl:

I am sure greasing of their palm will speed up their response to the inquiries

Yup, grease it with a healthy amount of nitro glycerin infused dollar bills... then wait for the almighty boom a Google HQ. :-"

Reply #25 Top

Google flagging malicious sites is an awesome service. When they flag you its for a reason. Shouldn't take too long for the team here to locate the cause and fix it.