You wrote: "The subject raised in my blog "Iraq Again: The Human Cost of Taking Fallujah" raised a range of issues. I begin by making it clear that I am not being critical or unduly judgmental....These are powerful words. They have been spoken by a man who fought and is a witness to that unspeakable war."
It's not unusual, when passionate about a subject, to find ourselves contradicting our intentions.
If you would take the time, I'd be interested in hearing your view, were you say National Security adviser to Pres. Bush, on how to handle the present situation in Fallujah, and in Iraq in general.
The following is an Ass. Press excerpt:
"Bellon asserted that previous attempts to win trust from Iraqis suspicious of US intentions had telegraphed weakness by asking,” 'What are your needs? What are your emotional needs?' All this Oprah [stuff]," he said. "They want to figure out who the dominant tribe is and say, 'I'm with you.' We need to be the benevolent, dominant tribe.... They're never going to like us," he added, echoing other Marine commanders who cautioned against raising hopes that Fallujans would warmly welcome troops when they return to ruined houses and rubble-strewn streets. The goal, Bellon said, is "mutual respect."
It is my understanding that the Arabic mu means 'safety' and that the verb afah means 'to protect' : mu afah would therefore refer to the Mafia seen as a clan offering protection to its members. What fills a power vacuum in a place such as Fallujah?