Draginol Draginol

The Huston Statement

The Huston Statement

Warner Todd Huston has written a statement of conservative values that I found very interesting.  Here it is below.

The Huston Statement 

Since our political climate has long since drifted from the first principles of our founding and since we now face a crisis threatening to tear down our American moral center we commit ourselves to re-establishing our American character.

We believe that our Constitution and the principles espoused in the Declaration of Independence form the best guide by which to nurture our American character and provides a firm bedrock upon which to build a government.

We as Americans believe:

That as individuals we have the right of self-determination, to be free of overweening involvement in our lives by government at all levels from local, to state, to federal.

That as free men we must strongly assert that we are responsible for ourselves, our family, and our property and that others owe us nothing but to observe our rights as we observe theirs.

That our liberties depend on our civic virtue and that it is up to each of us to become informed citizens.

With these God-given liberties in mind, that our representatives must strive to keep government out of the lives of the people to the greatest extent practicable and that they should honor the principles of limited government as handed down to us from our founders.

And we assert that adherence to these principles will act as a beacon of freedom to the world, that we should actively promote them abroad giving succor to all those that would follow in our footsteps, and that we should not lend legitimacy to foreign bodies or nations that retreat from them.

We affirm that:

Private property is sacrosanct

The market-based economy free of government meddling must be preserved

Employees must be free of compulsory associations

Governments must be accountable to the voters not to judges and unions

Communities have the right to draft standards without federal approval

Education is a local responsibility solely under local and state control

It is freedom of religion, not freedom from religion

And that our Second Amendment rights are God-given and cannot be infringed

Additionally, we as Americans also reaffirm that legislation is the rightful duty of our constituted bodies of representatives and not the venue of capricious judges. Ruling from the bench is no better than the ill-considered tyrannies from the throne from which we so long ago rebelled.

Finally, let us understand these principles to be an affirmation of our American character one that has made our nation the richest and strongest nation in human history. Any force, whether domestic or foreign, that wishes to materially alter this character is an enemy to our nation and one that should not be treated lightly but faced squarely and with resolution.

12,622 views 30 replies
Reply #26 Top

Quoting Daiwa, reply 20
Hard to assign 'degrees of importance' to the two documents, utemia, though from a strict legal standpoint the DoI carries no force and the Constitution has 'all' the importance.  Even the Supreme Court, however, has taken the DoI into consideration when deliberating the intent of the framers in writing certain constitutional provisions (if I'm not mistaken - I could be wrong about that).
End of Daiwa's quote

You are indeed correct.  The constitution is used when it is a case of The Peopel vs the Government (as that is what it is), but when it is the people vs the people, or some other legal issue not dealing with direct limitations of government, they use the DoI and Federalists papers (among others) to assist in their ruling.  Occassionally, you get a moonbat like Buzzy Ginsberg that wants to use another country's document, that is clearly outside of their jurisdiction.

Reply #27 Top

Thanks for the explanations. I could probably research most of what I want to know by myself but it is much more interesting to get a more personal answer.

Reply #28 Top

But I think it is a very simplistic way that neglects the history of ideas that surrounds the formation of it,
End of quote

Actually, in my opinion, to attempt to remove anything related to religion when talking about the DOI or the Costitution is neglecting or ignoring that back then people may have also used their religious beliefs as a guide line to create these documents.

What exactly is commonly meant with "freedeom of religion, not freedom from it"?
End of quote

My understanding is that as an individual we have the right to believe in any form of religion we chose and no one has the right to take that away from you, but as a group our Gov't can not represent any single religion because of the multiple beliefs found in those the Gov't serves. That is why we are free to believe in any religion we chose not freed from religion. It's not the Gov't or anyone elses job to supress a religion, it is it's job to represent all religions by not representing any in particular.

I don't think I said that they weren't christian or not influenced by it. But the general concept that an individual is born free to do what he wants with his life is not part of official christian doctrine back then.
End of quote

No, but it is part of life itself, something that those with religious beliefs believe God is responsible for. You have to look at it this way, a religious person will believe that everything has divine intervention in it because it's their belief that God created everything and everyone and therefor God was responsible for the creation of these documents and the freedoms it gives to the US citizens. Why? Because many if not all of those responsible for creating these documents were religious people.

It's as Nitro put it, you can't just turn it on and off when it suits you. Is the aws against taking property that does not belong to you (stealing) a religious concept or non-religious? Interesting to see this is a law that applied everywhere in the US and just happens to be one of the 10 commandments.

Reply #29 Top

You have to look at it this way, a religious person will believe that everything has divine intervention in it because it's their belief that God created everything and everyone and therefor God was responsible for the creation of these documents and the freedoms it gives to the US citizens. Why? Because many if not all of those responsible for creating these documents were religious people.
End of quote
That looks like circular reasoning to me. I don't know the biographical background of the authors of the DoI and constitution. It would be interesting to know what influenced their ethics, I am sure there is enough literature about that available - but I can't delve into that too much, sadly, don't have the time.

Is the aws against taking property that does not belong to you (stealing) a religious concept or non-religious?
End of quote
You know, I have never thought about that. I suppose it is one of the most fundamental laws that emerged in every human culture and society. The 10 commandments weren't supernew rules that hadn't been known beforehand - they're pretty fundamental or basic and can be found in different ancient societiies. I would say that respecting property or property rights is a political concept, not religious.

 

Reply #30 Top

Quoting utemia, reply 27
Thanks for the explanations. I could probably research most of what I want to know by myself but it is much more interesting to get a more personal answer.
End of utemia's quote

Hey!  You know more than most Americans! :grin: