Frogboy Frogboy

DesktopX 4: Task List

DesktopX 4: Task List

We need your help.

For DesktopX 4 our goal is to clean up DesktopX and put it in a place where we can start to build up on it again in a way that is, to be candid, economically viable.

So to start here is what we have in mind specifically for DesktopX 4.0:

New objects

It has been a long time since we have updated the content in DesktopX 4.

To many of you, this sort of thing isn’t that big of a deal. But to end users, having animated objects on their desktop that do interesting things can be very enticing.

Cleaning up old problems

This is where we need your help. I’m sure there are plenty of posts that outline this or that issue that users would like to see addressed. If someone can consolidate them that would be extremely helpful so that we can look and see which are doable, which are doable but only helpful to a tiny number of users, and which ones just can’t realistically be done.

Windows 7 and UAC

As a practical matter, we won’t officially include or support anything that doesn’t work perfectly on Windows 7 with UAC on its default setting.  That doesn’t mean users can’t create things that require UAC to be off or only work on Windows XP but those things won’t be supported by us.

Open Sourcing the plugins

image

These are the plugins that come with DesktopX. Some of these will likely go away but the source code will be made available.  Note that right now, none of these are certified for Windows 7. Until they are certified for Windows 7, they’re at risk of being removed.

Adding new plugins

Going forward, we won’t be developing new plugins. We just don’t have the budget for it. We never had intended on creating any plugins beyond samples (otherwise, we would have just made the features a base part of the program).

If someone wants to submit to us plugins they’d like to include with the program (we’d need source code for liability purposes) let us know.

Things likely to go away

We will probably move away from taskbar and system tray functionality. It gets increasingly difficult to manage that sort of thing. If someone wants to create a plugin for it, that’s great but we want to move away from having to having to support such functionality because every version of Windows ends up with a different way of getting to that data (particularly the system tray).

image

So that’s where we’re at

Please comment here on what you’d like to see. Be as specific as you can.

Thanks!

141,537 views 31 replies
Reply #26 Top

Quoting Uvah, reply 23
As long as I'm here. Any progress to note on DX4? Or is it dead.

 

dont know.. been 3 months since i sent in a bug report on DX 3.x.  Saw 1 reply that it was being moved to someone else to look at.. that was at least a month or more ago..   I would love to see some major updates, but.. doubt it.  it doesnt bring in the $$ so.. why spend $$ on it.  I dont think i have made anything for the public in years now.  I make things for our company, and personal use, but thats about it these days..

Reason i never reply is that i never get any kind of notice that people have replied to a post, so i dont come check things out that often.  If i got an email that a post was updated, id be here more often.  Send me private email's if you need me for anything.

Reply #27 Top

Howdy David! :) Long time no see!

Reply #28 Top

It would be nice to see DX alive again.  But lets take a look at what Brad had to say about DX4 in December of 2009.

 

https://forums.wincustomize.com/369041/page/8/#replies Reply 200

Sure. It would be nice if there were full time developers making plugins.

But someone has to pay for them.  DesktopX 1.0 came out in what? 2000.  Users have gotten 9 years of free updates to DesktopX.  

There just aren't enough DesktopX users (and never was) to support that kind of support.

The idea was that Stardock would provide the foundation and then the community would take it from there.  For a few years, Konfabulator and other such programs provided enough "competition" that Stardock developed tech was extended but Konfabulator is dead now along with all other gadget/widget movements (even Microsoft and Apple have largely abandoned their own techs).

What I pictured with DesktopX 4.0 was that we would strip out the pieces that aren't compatible with Windows 7 and then slowly build it back up with new stuff via collaboration with the community.

But if the community is going to become "consumers" then as a practically matter, either DesktopX has to be priced at a level that justifies the cost of doing the work (i.e. think $5000 or more) or it needs to die off.

 

Don't know what you think but i would say Brad decided to let DX die.

Reply #29 Top

I think some official honest and reliable words about the state and the future of EVERY Object Desktop program are in order. No PR blabla, just the utter naked truth.

Reply #30 Top

<X3