"The people calling for Rush Limbaugh to die are the same people who ask to control your healthcare."

from JoeUser Forums

As someone on Twitter pointed out, the same people who want universal healthcare are the same people who are hoping Rush Limbaugh will die.

Whenever the government gets involved in something, it becomes about politics. I don’t want health care decided by politicians.

As the Stimulus spending has shown – the best predictor of who will get government money is whether they agree with those spending it.

6,490 views 15 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top

I do find it sad that those who campaign for UHC are doing it because people are dying and then you have the same from that camp uttering death wishes against someone who has not committed a crime worthy of death?

Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top

NO health care is a gift from the elitists to the peasant class, mean rich people don't count. Only liberal money smells fresh and clean, once purified by our benevolent congress, after the stench of the taxpayers.

"Dez Demcrats is good masa's, not like dem bad onez fore 1865. Dez masa's wanst to keep uz hellzee, soz we kun keep dem in charge wiz ur votz. Long as wez don't wants a big house forz ur selvze day wontz be beaten uz."

Different time, different place, slightly different tactics, same agenda as pre-civil war. The Democrat Party. Except now they take applications for slavery from all races and groups.

Sins of a Solar Empire II
Reply #3 from Stardock Forums Top

I guess this type of thing happens on both sides of the spectrum, so i'm not shocked that left wingers are orgasming over Limbaughs heart attack. I guess they could get their wish to whack out whoever they diagree with when they are in charge of our health and have the power of life and death in their hands with Obamacare.

Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top

And I say "whack out" cause the American left look more and more like a Mafia than anything else.

Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top

"Dez Demcrats is good masa's, not like dem bad onez fore 1865. Dez masa's wanst to keep uz hellzee, soz we kun keep dem in charge wiz ur votz. Long as wez don't wants a big house forz ur selvze day wontz be beaten uz."
End of quote

The funny part is, that the ones in 1865 wanted to keep them healthy as well!  When you invest millions of dollars (in 2009 dollars) in an asset, you definitely dont want it to die on you.  Beat it?  Sure.

They just dont realize that the slavery has already started - until they go to complain and get beaten again (like Kurt Haskell anyone?)

Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top

I guess this type of thing happens on both sides of the spectrum, so i'm not shocked that left wingers are orgasming over Limbaughs heart attack.
End of quote

I'm sure it does, but you'd never know that if you take a look at the DU or Huffington Post. Are these people the far-left? Maybe. I've heard liberals on JU claim this site is far right, so if we use their own words as a yard stick to measure vitriol and hatred (I've never seen a conservative wish someone dead here, I never will and I would say I'm a typical conservative here), I would have to come to the conclusion that many liberals hate anyone that does not share their beliefs, to the point of death. Interestingly enough, I wonder if that might have something to do with the greatest mass murders over ideology (Stalin and Mao) lends this to be a recessed leftist trait. I'm not saying all left leaner's want to kill or would, given the chance, but it is an interesting pattern. Wonder if anyone had did a study on it. 

Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top

I'm convinced that many at the Huffington Post and the DU would gladly welcome gulags and concentration camps as long as they got to decide who would be banished.

Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top

As the Stimulus spending has shown – the best predictor of who will get government money is whether they agree with those spending it.
End of quote

Another possible explanation (don't know if it's correct or not though) - the allocation of money may have been influenced by whether the area was urban/it's population density, and since republicans tend to pick up more of the rural vote, if fewer funds were given to rural areas this would lead to an apparent trend of spending along political lines.

Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top

Another possible explanation (don't know if it's correct or not though) - the allocation of money may have been influenced by whether the area was urban/it's population density,
End of quote

It is not.  And the reason it made news for those who thought Obama was altrusistic.

Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top

Stop worrying, Rush will never have to face the stern democrat death panels--he can afford private care.

Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top

Quoting stevendedalus, reply 11
Stop worrying, Rush will never have to face the stern democrat death panels--he can afford private care.
End of stevendedalus's quote

Except the House bill makes it illegal.  With jail and fines if you do not join.  Da, Comrade!

Reply #13 from Stardock Forums Top

They constantly accuse those who oppose the healthcare of wanting people to die... remember the infamous "republicans think healthcare is dont get sick, and if you do get sick, die quickly"?

Forget wishing rush dies, they were trying to legislate death panels, and cutting care to the elderly (who paid into the system their whole life) to practically nothing to fund more care for the young.

Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top

Except the House bill makes it illegal.  With jail and fines if you do not join.  Da, Comrade!
End of quote

Exactly! as bad as the fines are, they actually want to include prison sentences there!

We should call things as they are... they are the tyrannical communist party, not the liberal democrat party.

Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top

If this healthcare bill was so wonderful why do they keep coming up with exemptions?  First themselves (in senate and house) then their major contributing Unions?  Scott Brown needed to win and crush this stupid bill.