CharlesCS CharlesCS

Liberals on Joeuser find comfort in silence

▼

Liberals on Joeuser find comfort in silence

from JoeUser Forums

Why are the JU Liberals so quite all of a sudden? How come they are not posting their opinions on recent events where Democrats are making fools of themselves? Why are they not making excuses, defending and at the least denying all these Demo-gate issues we are seeing on a daily basis?

Do you agree or not Obama deserves the B+ he gave himself? Do you agree or not with his non-surge surge for Afghanistan and the timeline he gave for it? Do you think all this Global Warming, Climate Change data fudging is a lie or the truth? Is the current healthcare bill that keeps shrinking and shrinking and changing from what the Democrats really wanted what you really want? Do Obama's abismal approval ratings bother you? Iran building more nuclear plants and testing new long-range missile while dismissing Obama and his "Diplomacy" and the U.N., does this not make you question our current policies?

Or is it that reality has finally sunk in, that everything you expected from Obama was nothing but lies, that this Administration has done more harm than good while blaming the previous Administration for their failure to get anything done, that Obama's B+ is more like a D-, that it was a mistake to vote for him?

Did I want Obama to fail? Yes, his policies would turn this country into everything our Forefathers were against, what our Constitution is against, what our culture is against. Do I want this country to fail? No, but I was not the one who voted for Obama and sometimes mistakes must be made and prices must be paid in order for the good to be learned. This is a 4 year lesson on how not to run this country and ignore and lie to it's people.

11 months, that's gotta be a record for failure.

Powered by Zoundry Raven

35,664 views 112 replies
Reply #51 from JoeUser Forums Top

Though the 25th should have been invoked during the last administration, thank the good lord it wasn't.  GW's redeeming factor was that he was defense against Cheney.

Reply #52 from JoeUser Forums Top

Still, did it ever occur to you that Obama is a hell of a lot better than GeoW?

In what respect?
End of quote

He mastered the TelePrompter.

Galactic Civilizations IV
Reply #53 from JoeUser Forums Top

 

He mastered the TelePrompter.
End of quote
Gotta give you that!

Reply #54 from JoeUser Forums Top

Arguably he's trying to end the wars Bush started and includes their costs in the budget rather as supplements. He at least broached the Gitmo disaster, though I feel he's bungled it. Though he has done a poor job in healthcare, it will pass with flaws but it will be improved on. The economy is tediously  returning. No miracles but better.

Reply #55 from JoeUser Forums Top

GW's redeeming factor was that he was defense against Cheney.
End of quote

LOL - and Obama's one redeeming factor is Biden!  AT least Cheney was not a total idiot - cant say that for the last 2 democrat VPs.

 

Reply #57 from JoeUser Forums Top

LOL - and Obama's one redeeming factor is Biden!  AT least Cheney was not a total idiot - cant say that for the last 2 democrat VPs
End of quote

 

See, I don't think Biden is an idiot; i think his major issue is he doesn't know when to shut up, his tendency for loquaciousness goes beyond absurd at times. Then again, he was re-elected consistently in his state - so I guess the people there were confident in him. 

 

 

~AJ

Reply #58 from JoeUser Forums Top

Yes, he loves to talk but what politician doesn't? Sometimes  he's guilty of gaffs, but he is far from mean-spirited like shotgun Cheney who is literally undermining national security efforts. 

Reply #59 from JoeUser Forums Top

Sometimes he's guilty of gaffs,
End of quote

Sometimes?  I would like to see your definition of "often".

And Cheney is undermining nothing.  He is squawking a low - just like the whiners Clinton and Carter.  What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

Reply #60 from JoeUser Forums Top

And Cheney is undermining nothing. He is squawking a low - just like the whiners Clinton and Carter. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
End of quote

 

I'm curious as to how you would justify the criticism from the former VP of the current Prersident - versus the current president allegedly criticizing a former president. How is that ethical and right again?

 

~AJ

Reply #61 from JoeUser Forums Top

And Cheney is undermining nothing.
End of quote
Oh, c;mon Shotgun Cheney is tampering with the nation's tranquility. He's itching for a disaster.

Reply #62 from JoeUser Forums Top

Oh, c;mon Shotgun Cheney is tampering with the nation's tranquility. He's itching for a disaster
End of quote

If that were the case, all he'd have to do is sit back and relax. I believe quite the opposite, he obviously cares enough and has enough knowledge on the subject to make a comment. He's not Cater, out of the loop for 30 years, stating opinion. I know the left has a special place in their hearts for the former VP, but one cannot question his qualifications.

Reply #63 from JoeUser Forums Top

Shotgun Cheney is tampering with the nation's tranquility. He's itching for a disaster.
End of quote

yes on the first part (and I should have added Cheney to my list of names on the previous blog).  No on the latter part.  He is a town crier, but it will make no difference until the news comes true.  This is a classic case of shooting the messenger.  It is obvious that Cheney is worried about terrorism, and Obama is not.  It is also obvious that it is not a matter of if (which is what Obama is hoping for) but when (which is what Cheney is warning about) terrorists will succeed.  As they say, we have to be vigilent 100% of the time, they have to be lucky only once.

And he will never live down that hunting accident.  It is funny especially since no one was seriously hurt.

Reply #64 from JoeUser Forums Top

cares enough and has enough knowledge on the subject to make a comment.
End of quote
His comments carry about as much weight as a Keith Olberman or Sean Hannity evaluation. Frankly, bad heart notwithstanding, he's running in 2012.

Reply #65 from JoeUser Forums Top

It is obvious that Cheney is worried about terrorism, and Obama is not.
End of quote
And evidence of that is the Iraq war, eh, at the expense of Afghanistan?

Reply #66 from JoeUser Forums Top

His comments carry about as much weight as a Keith Olberman or Sean Hannity evaluation. Frankly, bad heart notwithstanding, he's running in 2012.
End of quote

I'd say he had much better access to the information than KO or SH. All of Cheney's public comments have been on security matters, not general criticism of the Obama administration, which would be easy to do. Come on Richard... you're stretching now. I don't think you'll see him on the ticket in 2012.

And evidence of that is the Iraq war, eh, at the expensr of Afghanistan?
End of quote

No... the evidence is we weren't successfully attacked after 9-11.

Reply #67 from JoeUser Forums Top

No... the evidence is we weren't successfully attacked after 9-11.
End of quote
Yes, the favorite slogan--and thankfully. But much of it is a mix of vigilance and luck. And I know you will say all luck with Obama.

Reply #68 from JoeUser Forums Top

No... the evidence is we weren't successfully attacked after 9-11
End of quote

 

Which means....what exactly? That Cheney is superman? If you're implying that he helped make us safer...dude, there were at least sixteen attacks during that administration, not to mention that more people became pissed off at us. That doesn't sound like a winning formula to me. 

 

~AJ

Reply #69 from JoeUser Forums Top

And evidence of that is the Iraq war, eh, at the expense of Afghanistan?
End of quote

What Afghanistan?  The one that Bush fought?  or the one that Obama will not?

 

And I know you will say all luck with Obama.
End of quote

nah - christmas was vigilence - by a passenger, not Obama or any of his administration.

Reply #70 from JoeUser Forums Top

What Afghanistan? The one that Bush fought? or the one that Obama will not?
End of quote
Unbelievable posture!

Reply #71 from JoeUser Forums Top

That doesn't sound like a winning formula to me.
End of quote
By Jove, you nailed it!

Reply #72 from JoeUser Forums Top

And I know you will say all luck with Obama.
End of quote

Sure bad luck.

Reply #73 from JoeUser Forums Top

If you're implying that he helped make us safer...dude, there were at least sixteen attacks during that administration, not to mention that more people became pissed off at us.
End of quote

Oh, God forbid people get angry when we foil their attacks against us (that's right in your eyes they have a right to their opinion). In case you haven't notices Obama has now become the King of Predator Missile attacks....how that helping you make friends? Maybe the next Peace Prize will go to the Hellfire missile company.

Reply #74 from JoeUser Forums Top

Quoting stevendedalus, reply 70

What Afghanistan? The one that Bush fought? or the one that Obama will not? Unbelievable posture!
End of stevendedalus's quote

Thank you!

Reply #75 from JoeUser Forums Top

Oh, God forbid people get angry when we foil their attacks against us (that's right in your eyes they have a right to their opinion). In case you haven't notices Obama has now become the King of Predator Missile attacks....how that helping you make friends? Maybe the next Peace Prize will go to the Hellfire missile company.
End of quote

Ignoring your idiotic assumptions of me based on what you've been indoctrinated with...my point:

 

You ever heard of the story about the gunslinger that drew his guns at every single provacation?

He wound up shooting his foot off. Point being, lobbing rocks at someone who can move around and such - is....well, wasteful. Get in, get out, and get the job done (efficiently). Quit dicking around and pissing them off while they restock, rethink, and hit us again. In my opinion, we need to just get in and finish it. But we're not, and meanwhile the politcians are playing games and our men and women in the military are getting killed....

Are making progress?

Remember that one troglodyte....what was his name again...oh righ: Osama Bin Laden. Didn't we catch him, like we were supposed to do? (To quote Robin Williams, "No, but we caught four of his number three's!. What the f**k!?")

~AJ