the same paper did run another opinon saying, in part at least, the very opposite......
That guy has already been sufficiently debunked by not only Zionists and Israeli authorities but also by British and Canadian military commanders.
He made up some of the stuff he "saw" and was later upset that the "human rights council" ignored half of what he said (namely everything he mentioned about Hamas).
However, the author I quite brings up an interesting point: How did the "5,500 wounded" manage to get to Egypt and Jordan and is there evidence for their presence, then, in such hospitals? And why are Gaza's hospital beds empty, if they are? Did anybody else look into this?
Neither you nor I have first-hand evidence and both of us read stories written by others. But is it not strange that although two versions of the story exist, the vast majority believe the anti-Israel version and do not even question the contradictory elements in that version?
How on earth did over 5000 people manage to get to Jordan and Egypt while wounded without anybody but Hamas noticing it? If they can smuggle out thousands of wounded people, what kind of blockade do we really have there?
The author you link to is also lying: "Five weeks after the release of the Report of the Fact Finding Mission on Gaza, there has been no attempt by any of its critics to come to grips with its substance." That is simply not true. While he might not agree with the people who debunked him, he is dishonest if he claims that there has been no attempt by critics to "come to grips" with its substance. People have pointed out where he erred and where he lied. They obviously came to grips with its substance (or with what little substance there was).
If I read an article that starts with a lie, I tend to ignore the rest of what it says.
He continues to lie:
I did not anticipate that the IDF would have targeted civilians and civilian objects.
He doesn't know that. He wasn't there. People might have told him that the IDF "targeted civilians", but that is NOT proof that they did. If he BELIEVES accusations, that's his choice. But if he propagates accusations and pretends they are proof, he becomes a liar.
I did not anticipate seeing the vast destruction of the economic infrastructure of Gaza including its agricultural lands, industrial factories, water supply and sanitation works.
I do not believe that he is really that dumb. After I heard the media reports I fully expected to see vast destruction. If he didn't, I wonder what sources he has. As someone (who claims to be) experienced with these things, he seemed rather surprised to see what a war is like.
These are not military targets. I have not heard or read any government justification for this destruction.
And that is another lie. Not only does everything become a military target when used by fighters (and Hamas fired from schools and homes and hid in hospitals), but Israel has also said what they targeted and why. In fact the IDF has published videos that showed Hamas and other fighters fire from homes and booby-trap a zoo and similar scenarios.
If he honestly missed all these, I cannot imagine why anybody would think that he is competent or even at all capable to author a report on a situation.
An official who after months and months of official explanations from Israel does not reject those explanation but claims that he has never heard of them belongs in a disciplinary court but not before a "human rights" council. He clearly has no idea what went on in Israel and Gaza, although he does at least point out that Hamas also fired at Israel.
Seriously, show me a criticism of Israel by someone who at least has the decency not to admit directly that he refused to look at certain evidence, and we can talk.
Note that I do not think that Goldstone is evil or a bad person. I just think that he is incompetent. That's probably why the human rights council choce him to prepare the report: he is Jewish, pro-Israel and is officially experienced. The fact that he would also point the finger at Hamas could easily be overlooked (as the "human rights" council did at the end) and the result is another condemnation of Israel.
When I claim that Hamas target civilians or use civilians at human shields, I can easily verify my own claims. I can go to Sderoth and wait for a rocket and I can watch the videos the IDF show of Hamas fighters hiding behind children and firing. Oddly enough the opposite accusations are never backed up with video evidence but are still believed by a populace who claim niot to be prejudiced against Jews.
With thousands of journalists covering the conflict and constantly criticising Israel you would thank that at least one of them would be capable of coming up with video evidence for the sort of crime people like Goldstone claim happen so often that it must be regarded as systematic.
But then of course there is always step 2: the Jews probably covered it up. (They "control the media", after all.)