There's a point where it goes beyond merely defending yourself or your country/family. There's a point where you begin to use that noble concept as a justification for any over step, miscues, etc. Israel has gone past that a number of times in my opinion.
And you base that opinion on what? Stories people tell you about Israel? What you yourself saw? Your opinion that Israel cannot possibly be innocent?
You are wrong. The IDF goes to more extreme lengths than any other army in the world to avoid civilian casualties and has had much better results than any other army in the world.
The continuing accusations are purely based on anti-Semitism.
You did NOT wake up one morning and suddenly get an objective insight into the matter. You did not see what you claim the Israelis have done.
What's the more reasonable/rational concept: Israel is being conspired against by the vast majority of the world so that they're always wrong and so on, or just maybe they have made mistakes and need to own up to them.
So you are arguing that anti-Semitism doesn't exist because it isn't reasonable to assume that it does?
The FACTS state plainly that in the wars Israel fights there were fewer civilian deaths (and fewer total deaths) than in all other wars fought in the region, and fewer civilian deaths than in all other wars fought that had the same number of total deaths.
So even if it sounds unreasonable to you, if the vast majority of the world decides that despite the facts, Israel is still guilty of horrible crimes, there is something wrong in the world.
(Does it sound reasonable and rational to you that the world discusses Israel's "crimes" every day while at the same time those who accuse Israel of genocide actually do murder hundreds of thousands of people in Darfur?)
Note that it is not "mistakes" that Israel is accused of. The "report" accuses Israel of DELIBERATELY shooting at civilians, as if the IDF had nothing better to do.
It's the usual strategy: Accuse Israel of the most heinous crimes. Then argue that since Israel "isn't perfect" and "makes mistakes", Israel has obviously committed those crimes. Apparently the only defence Israel could possibly bring up to defend herself is proven perfection and a complete and total and verified ability to avoid any and all mistakes.
The usual procedure (when the accused isn't Israel), of course, is to PROVE that war crimes were committed by the party, not to stipulate that they were and then demand proof of the accused's perfection as the only acceptable defence against the charges.
I totally accept that the IDF shoots more civilians than necessary to reach its military goals. I totally accept that the IDF and Israel make mistakes, lots of them.
I do NOT accept that the IDF and Israel make more mistakes than everybody else, because the numbers simply prove the opposite.
And I do NOT accept that those mistakes constitute "deliberate murder" or some other war crime.
Making anecdotal evidence for mistakes into proof for a crime requires more prejudice than I can muster against anyone.
Defense or not....no one, not even Israel, is perfect.
That is a strawman. It is perfectly possible for an imperfect being to be innocent.
War crime definitions take into account imperfection.
What's on trial everywhere is not Israel's perfectness, but Israel's innocence.
I put it to you that Israel is not perfect, but perfectly innocent of the many crimes people keep accusing the country of.
I put it to you, even, that while you are not perfect, you are, as far as I know, innocent of murder. And if anybody asks me if you are guilty of murder, I will tell them that I do not believe that you are because I have seen no evidence of the crime.
And if they tell me that you are guilty of murder because you are not perfect, I will tell them that I do not believe that perfection and innocence are the same thing and that I believe that imperfect beings can still be innocent; and that my dislike for you personally does not suggest to me that your imperfection proves your guilt.
I know I cannot expect you to afford Israel the same consideration. You go with the flow.
And yeah yeah, call me anti-semitic all you want; honestly, I don't give a fuck. I know who I am and am not, and your opinion doesn't matter on that topic.
I don't think you know.
I do not believe that you are an anti-Semite because you are evil, like the "Stormfront" guys. I do, however, find that you have internalised the common anti-Semitism of the west, the weird belief that somehow the Jewish state must be guilty of _something_, that in the case of Israel anything but perfection is a crime and that Israel is either perfect or guilty of war crimes.
Do you think, if the stories about Israel were true, "Palestinians" would WANT to continue fighting, would DEMAND a "right to return" to the place where all those horrible murderers now live?
Did it ever even enter your mind that perhaps Israel, while being imperfect like all other human-made states, might be innocent and that, perhaps, anti-Semitism and centuries of lies about Jewish crimes did not suddenly end in your generation but still shape public (and your) opinion?
I can see that you at least never thought about the real implications of imperfection. You actually did and perhaps still do think that if Israel is not perfect, Israel must be guilty of crimes. The possibility that Israel could be imperfect yet innocent you ruled out. And THAT is my problem with you.