Frogboy Frogboy

Tough love for desktop enhancements is needed

Tough love for desktop enhancements is needed

Object_Desktop_2008_Logo It’s time to have a very candid discussion about the future of Windows customization.

For the past couple of years, I’ve been focusing on other parts of the company. Users on WinCustomize.com and related sites have no doubt noticed that my activity has dropped a great deal for awhile. 

Focusing on Stardock’s games unit and the Impulse unit required a lot of the time I used to devote to the desktop enhancements group.  Starting Monday, I’m back – somewhat anyway.

And today I spent time looking over the state of desktop enhancements and in particular Stardock’s desktop enhancements and I don’t like what I see.

First, third-party customization seems totally dead.  For all the grief we used to receive about how “open source” and “freeware” would rule the world (how those uxtheme patches working out these days?) it’s pretty clear that that development crowd has moved on to other things.

Let’s face it, Windows Vista and Windows 7 in particular look awesome. Microsoft has done a great job improving the experience for Windows users.  Why on earth should people pay money for programs that often make Windows look worse? Or make things behave flakey?

Does this mean that customization is dying? No.  It means that desktop enhancements have to adapt to the OS people actually use.  We’re a long ways from the days of Windows 2000 or Windows XP now. 

Sure, lots of people still use Windows XP. But it’s a dying market. It came out 8 years ago. It’s time to move on.  You can’t focus making software for legacy operating systems if your overall audience are cutting edge power users.  I know that might upset some people but it’s true.

In two weeks, Windows 7 comes out.  I’m running it right now. It’s awesome. And if desktop customization is going to move forward, it needs to start looking at customizing the things that today’s users want to customize even if that means starting from scratch.

Keep an eye on Object Desktop starting today and going forward. You’re going to see some pretty rapid changes coming.

269,866 views 141 replies
Reply #76 Top

no

Reply #77 Top

Quoting Frogboy, reply 61
Here's the economics in this:
Let me give you a case in point: .NET

On XP, .NET is not a very great experience.  On Windows 7, it's totally integrated in and lightning fast. Coding things in .NET is 10X faster and we know on Windows 7 that they have it.  On Windows XP, we have to do checks and do all kinds of pain.  Now, in this example, we would likely still support XP.

End of Frogboy's quote

I suspect the performance on Windows 7 is more to do with the PCs running Windows 7 vs XP are quicker and have much more memory.  The framework is almost certainly pretty much identical.

.NET suffers terribly with fragmented HDs and those XP installs may well be a little less clean than those 7 installs (Plus SSDs really help with .NET app startup times)

Of course those PCs running Windows XP may well be slower so in general XP users may find the performance will be worse with the .NET apps than the average Windows 7 user.

Quoting Frogboy, reply 61

But what about WPF? On XP, Windows Presentation Foundation is very slow and problematic in my opinion.  But the alternative is using older GDI type stuff like we used to in ObjectBar and DesktopX and such.  But on Windows Vista and Windows 7, the legacy GDI stuff isn't even hardware accelerated any more.  So we'd be stuck writing two different drawing routines. 
End of Frogboy's quote

Actually due to the speed of cpus and the number of threads a cpu can now process, GDI performance on Windows 7 is pretty decent and there is little need to develop two different drawing routines.  This is especially helped with Windows 7 no longer having basically a single thread for all GDI operations.

In some ways Windows 7 actually has better GDI performance than the hardware accelerated Windows XP, something that became very obvious during the development of the WindowBlinds 7 UI.

+1 Loading…
Reply #78 Top

According to the Windows 7 engineering blog, they're trying to put it all into video memory and accelerate common GDI operations - so yeah, GDI is (at least partially) hardware accelerated again.

 

Reply #79 Top

In reading all the replies I agree with the thinking that the capatibility of the software needs to move forward to Win 7.

I also understand that at some point in time XP will not longer be addressed, again no problem with that. 

I have a XP system and a Vista system which will be upgraded to Win 7 this month.  I'll keep the XP system as long as it keeps working and I'll keep updating Stardock software on it untill it stops working.  I'm not going to get another computer to be able to run Vista, that would be just silly. 

Some folks will be able to update from XP or Vista to Win 7 some won't,  Some folks will stop using Stardock software and new members will join the community.  With things like this, it always seems to even out, as long as the product keeps pace with the technology.

Well, at least it's what I think.

Reply #80 Top

K, time for some tough love... THE first thing I checked on Win 7.. the Aero clones, midnight, executive etc. Look great with huge taskbar, as soon as u revert .... broke. Taskbar is too thin, start button is half submerged.

Looks to me that u can skin for either a fat or thin taskbar but not both, just one thing I have already found that needs attn in WB7 ...imo.

Reply #81 Top

revert to what? thin taskbar? i doubt many people will use a thin taskbar in win7 after getting used to the 'super bar'. i was old on the new taskbar after using it for 10 minutes. john, if you skin for a thin taskbar in Win7, I'm sure all 3 people who use it will be very happy. :grin:

 

 

oh yeah!!   GO COLTS!

Reply #82 Top

No offense but u really have no idea how many people will John, I might just have a little more of a finger on the pulse than u.. maybe.....?

Regardless, is that any reason to not have it work both ways? I HATE the big taskbar... why wouldn't many others? Looks like a lego taskkbar.

Very few people are even on 7 thus far so we really have no idea how popular a fat bar will be.

Whats the logic behind it?  certainly edges in on real estate, Almost every skinner , and customizer i know who has used it has reverted to the smaller normal taskbar. Customizers have complained for YEARS about how big the taskbar was, WE WANT A SLIM TASKBAR !!! WAAHHH !!! and MS pushes this on us??

The first thing I checked on Win 7 already has provided a reason to make yet another substyle.. to please everyone.

Fact is.. it doesnt work well.. both ways.. it's broke.. it needs attention.

If people werent going to use a slimmer bar, why did MS provide an option to use it?

Since when was business about pleasing those only using the latest and greatest?

 

and no GO JAGS !!!!!!!!!!

Reply #83 Top

Well said.  I've been running Object Desktop for a LONG time now and have been skinning my OS since the days of OS/2 and Kaleidoscope for Mac OS 8.  I've heard Mac users talk about their wonderous interface since OS X showed up and to be honest I think the Windows-based PC is certainly more customizable (using WindowBlinds, Icon Packager and of coure OD,,,)

Bit we've come a long way since the days of Windows 95/98/2000 and XP.  It's time that more of the new stuff is designed for the next generations of Windows OS (Vista and now Windows 7).  There are too few skins that enhance the functionality of Windows 7 and we see too few skins that are functional and good looking.  I miss the excellent skins that people like Essorant, Andi18, Mormegil, Kol, Boxxi, MikeB and so many others developed for the earlier versions of Windows.  Now the skins are very generic and many fail to be more than something I'll choose over the standard OS interface occasionally.  Windows 7 looks GREAT and it takes a lot to switch over to something new.

Since MyColors hasn't been updated for Windows 7 and many of the current WindowBlinds/iconPackages seem to still be designed with Windows XP in mind, I'm hopeful that there will be a trend in the coming months looking to update many of the classic skins and bring a new excitement to customizing Windows 7 (which I'll have to agree with Frogboy - it's a great looking and working OS).

Reply #84 Top

Now the skins are very generic and many fail to be more than something I'll choose over the standard OS interface occasionally.
End of quote

Thanks for making my point. They are generic because skinning them has become very restrictive.

 

I'm hopeful that there will be a trend in the coming months looking to update many of the classic skins and bring a new excitement to customizing Windows 7
End of quote

Many of the older great skins were not designed with Win 7 in mind and therefore will require redesign into a more generic form.

Something tells me the authors aren't about to do that.

Open up Win 7 more and give us more freedom and control of every independent area and the glory days of skinning.. will return.

Reply #85 Top

I personally couldn't give a pigs fart/rats ass/flying f**k about gadgets/widgets in my menu. I just wanna be able to skin it, and customize the way RC does today, just on a 64 bit OS. Vista or Win7 - doesn't matter, as long as it just works.
End of quote

Once again I'm with Snowy, as long as I can skin it, add My own folders and shortcuts to it and it works, I'll be more than satisfied.

 

Reply #86 Top

.................Forgot to ask, are any current MyColors Themes going to get a 7 version added ????

Reply #87 Top

After playing around with WindowsBlinds a bit more (on my Vista system) - the transition between Windows themes and Stardock themes is still a bit rough. Sometimes Windows seems to forget about hardware acceleration and has difficulties getting Aero back.

Also, the scroll bar at the bottom of the new WindowsBlinds UI - honestly, it's a bit thin.

Reply #88 Top

it's not worth having an opinion anymore.

Reply #89 Top

well, john, you and the other three
End of quote

Your minimizing a genuine concern... just because you like it, does not in any way mean others will.

just because you may have a big monitor.. doesn't mean others.. do. In addition, monitor size is not the only determining factor.

When your in business to provide a service, you have to consider as broad an audience as you can, to the extent.. it is possible for you to do so.

You say 'most' of the people you know? Check the screenshot galleries sometime and not just this site, all the custo. sites. You'll be hard pressed to find many even double taskbars. Do some research before you come telling me how many people do or don't want something.

:)

 

Also, the scroll bar at the bottom of the new WindowsBlinds UI - honestly, it's a bit thin.
End of quote

Def. needs to be a couple to 4 pixels taller.

------------------------------------------------------

Honestly as much good feedback as I'm getting in 'support' of improving WB for the better from those that can do something about it or at least reply in this thread, starting to wonder why I bother. Sure I'm griping, trying to get some folks involved for my cause but it is for the betterment of skinning that I do so.. if everyone want's as someone already quoted, galleries full of "generic" looking themes, by all means ignore me.

Reply #90 Top

Quoting vStyler, reply 84

Now the skins are very generic and many fail to be more than something I'll choose over the standard OS interface occasionally.


Thanks for making my point. They are generic because skinning them has become very restrictive.

 


I'm hopeful that there will be a trend in the coming months looking to update many of the classic skins and bring a new excitement to customizing Windows 7


Many of the older great skins were not designed with Win 7 in mind and therefore will require redesign into a more generic form.

Something tells me the authors aren't about to do that.

Open up Win 7 more and give us more freedom and control of every independent area and the glory days of skinning.. will return.
End of vStyler's quote

 

An Example being ToonXP. We'll not see the likes of this again

Reply #91 Top

Regardless, is that any reason to not have it work both ways? I HATE the big taskbar... why wouldn't many others? Looks like a lego taskkbar.
End of quote

Agreed. I like a more minimalist approach, even on 1920x1200.

Reply #92 Top

John -

Have you tried a vertical taskbar setup yet on W7?  Just curious, because that's my working preference, most displays being large & landscape.

Reply #93 Top

....

Reply #94 Top

It's ok to take an opposing view on something John, but you have to be prepared to look at the big picture and not just the 'folks you know"

Like the D2Jbug posted, the older more extravagant themes, the reason people were attracted to skinning to begin with are unlikely to be seen again if the current level of OS control does not improve.

It just is not doable in Vista \ 7

Sure there are folks that are going crazy with the UI.. but for good, solid, bug free usable themes.. you have to adhere to a level of restriction that frankly end up with generic looking themes..once a skinner that knows what their doing weighs all the options... period.

Bring back some control, bring back more control.. everyone will benefit from it.

 

Daiwa, no, I haven't looked at verts yet. ( on XP right now :P )

Reply #95 Top

Bring back some control, bring back more control..
End of quote

 

 

bears repeating IMHO

Reply #96 Top

Might I mention that moving the desktop into the future would be nice, 3D comes to mind.

Reply #97 Top

3D comes to mind.
End of quote

 

 

I think SD should buy up 3DNA

clean it, let it integrate with ODNT

Reply #98 Top

I'm excited to hear that Stardock is moving forward with Win7 and trying to mostly leave XP behind.  I think it found when Vista came out it couldn't put everything into moving forward because there was resistance to people switching to it.  Win7 is awesome in my opinion and it seems many others.  Sure it has its problems, but overall its a very capable OS.

Frankly I'm hoping Stardock gets some innovative and useful programs out for Win7.  I have debated whether to stay with OD because I found myself less and less interested in using the programs except for WB and IP.  I liked the idea of RightClick but found it not that convenient for me to setup and use.  I really like DesktopX but never found a theme worth my time to arrange to my liking.  It required too much knowledge or time to rearrange.

ThemeManager is nice for suites, but to assemble my own suite wasn't possible since OD+ for instance isn't in there.  Again it seemed too much work to bother with.

Overall I hardly change my themes anymore where I used to change them once a month or so.  Maybe there aren't that many cool themes to change to or I just don't see the point.  Only so much difference in them that there can be.  The setup I have is useful and I have little desire to change it up much except to occaisionally switch up the cursor or the WB.

So I'm curious what is coming up because when my subscription there is a possibility I may not renew.  I haven't really seen the value in it.

Reply #99 Top

Let my put my opinion in on the Windows 7 tall taskbar.  YUK!  I agree with vStyler, Microsoft has ruined the ability to make quality skins in Windows 7, period.

Reply #100 Top

Maybe there aren't that many cool themes to change to or I just don't see the point. Only so much difference in them that there can be.
End of quote

Can't imagine why ;)