Moral Values, Religious?
So, morality stands for religion, except when it works in your favor?
So, morality stands for religion, except when it works in your favor?
I'm sorry, but though that would be treason, if true, I'm not sure how that relates at all to Senator Kerry. It seems to me as if President Nixon committed treason, not the junior senator from Massachusetts.
Yes, I was alive during Vietnam, I had an uncle and six cousins fight in Vietnam and I had my draft card. I also admit, I was thinking of how I would be able to flee to Canada should my number come up, but I didn't have to because the war ended less than a year after I turned 18.
Anyway, please tell me how Kerry is connected to Nixon's supposed actions, something I've only heard about from you by the way, and I've been studying/teaching history for along time.
Cheers
Reply #26 By: jeblackstar - 12/2/2004 11:57:22 PM I'm sorry, but though that would be treason, if true, I'm not sure how that relates at all to Senator Kerry. It seems to me as if President Nixon committed treason, not the junior senator from Massachusetts. Yes, I was alive during Vietnam, I had an uncle and six cousins fight in Vietnam and I had my draft card. I also admit, I was thinking of how I would be able to flee to Canada should my number come up, but I didn't have to because the war ended less than a year after I turned 18. Anyway, please tell me how Kerry is connected to Nixon's supposed actions, something I've only heard about from you by the way, and I've been studying/teaching history for along time. Cheers |
| Reply #14 By: drmiler - 11/30/2004 9:26:33 PM Reply #12 By: jeblackstar - 11/30/2004 4:23:52 PM Hey, moral values were the most important thing to me in this election, and I voted for Kerry. For me it was an issue of, war on false pretenses, or war with honor, and I thought Kerry could give honor. |
| How can some one who commits treason, give honor? Talk about false pretenses. |
| Anyway, please tell me how Kerry is connected to Nixon's supposed actions, something I've only heard about from you by the way, and I've been studying/teaching history for along time. |
he's claiming kerry violated the logan act by travelling to paris and meeting with members of the north vietnamese delegation (actually with both sides) altho there is absolutely no evidence of his involvement or interference with the negotiations. considering the fact that the nixon administration never even attempted to prosecute him, it's highly unlikely there was any basis for an indictment.
im the one who brought up the 68 nixon campaign sabotaging the negotiations--for which there is substantial evidence.
| Reply #28 By: kingbee - 12/3/2004 12:31:04 AM Anyway, please tell me how Kerry is connected to Nixon's supposed actions, something I've only heard about from you by the way, and I've been studying/teaching history for along time. he's claiming kerry violated the logan act by travelling to paris and meeting with members of the north vietnamese delegation (actually with both sides) altho there is absolutely no evidence of his involvement or interference with the negotiations. |
Never Apologize, Never Explain From the November 1 / November 8, 2004 issue: John Kerry's real record as an antiwar activist. by Joshua Muravchik 11/01/2004, Volume 010, Issue 08 Increase Font Size Printer-Friendly Email a Friend Respond to this article JOHN KERRY SAYS HE IS "PROUD" of his activities in opposition to the Vietnam War. Why, then, have he and his spokesmen consistently misrepresented them? Indeed the Kerry camp has been so effective in obscuring this history that both the New York Times and the Washington Post were forced to run corrections on the subject recently because their reporters relied on misinformation that the Kerry camp had succeeded in putting into wide circulation. When the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth unveiled the fourth in their series of television ads--this one accusing Kerry of having "secretly met with the enemy" in Paris--both papers went into full debunking mode. The Post ran 600 words under the headline: "Ad Says Kerry 'Secretly' Met With Enemy; But He Told Congress of It." The story explained that the Swifties were "referring to a meeting Kerry had in early 1971 with leaders of the communist delegation that was negotiating with U.S. representatives at the Paris peace talks. The meeting, however, was not a secret. Kerry . . . mentioned it in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in April of that year." The next morning the Post ran a correction. The previous day's story, it noted, "incorrectly said that John F. Kerry met with a Vietnamese communist delegation in Paris in 1971. The meeting was in 1970." The correction did not acknowledge, however, that this apparently minor error invalidated the entire point of the Post's impeachment of the Swifties' ad. Kerry's visit to Paris took place in or around May 1970, eleven months before his Foreign Relations Committee testimony. In other words, his meeting with the Communists (while he was still a reserve officer in the U.S. Navy) appears to have been kept secret for nearly a year. |
John Kerry and the VVAW: Hanoi's American Puppets? Newly discovered documents link Vietnam Veterans Against the War to Vietnamese communists Two recently discovered documents captured from the Vietnamese communists during the Vietnam War strongly support the contention that a close link existed between the Hanoi regime and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) while John Kerry served as the group's leading national spokesman. The Circular: International Coordination of Antiwar Propaganda The first document is a 1971 "Circular" distributed by the Vietnamese communists within Vietnam. It discusses strategies to coordinate their national propaganda effort with their orchestration of the activities of sympathetic counterparts in the American anti-war movement. Specifically, the document notes that the Vietcong and North Vietnamese delegations to the Paris Peace talks were being used as the communications link to direct the activities of anti-war activists meeting with them in Paris. To quote from the document: The spontaneous antiwar movements in the US have received assistance and guidance from the friendly ((VC/NVN)) delegations at the Paris Peace Talks. -- Circular on Antiwar Movements in the US. The reference to "VC" indicates the Vietcong; "NVN" is the North Vietnamese government. This sentence is particularly important in light of John Kerry's admission that he met with leaders of both communist delegations to the Paris Peace Talks in June 1970, including Madame Binh, foreign minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government (PRG) of South Vietnam, also known as the Vietcong. FBI files record that Kerry returned to Paris to meet with the North Vietnamese delegation in August of 1971, and planned a third trip in November. |
Author: Kerry's Meeting With Communists Broke U.S. Law Marc Morano, CNSNews.com Thursday, May 20, 2004 The 1970 meeting that John Kerry conducted with North Vietnamese communists violated U.S. law, according to an author and researcher who has studied the issue. Kerry met with representatives from "both delegations" of the Vietnamese in Paris in 1970, according to Kerry's own testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on April 22, 1971. But Kerry's meetings with the Vietnamese delegations were in direct violation of laws forbidding private citizens from negotiating with foreign powers, according to researcher and author Jerry Corsi, who began studying the anti-war movement in the early 1970s. According to Corsi, Kerry violated U.S. code 18 U.S.C. 953. "A U.S. citizen cannot go abroad and negotiate with a foreign power," Corsi told CNSNews.com. By Kerry's own admission, he met in 1970 with delegations from the North Vietnamese communist government and discussed how the Vietnam War should be stopped. Kerry explained to Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman J. William Fulbright in a question-and-answer session on Capitol Hill a year after his Paris meetings that the war needed to be stopped "immediately and unilaterally." Then Kerry added: "I have been to Paris. I have talked with both delegations at the peace talks, that is to say the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the Provisional Revolutionary Government." However, both of the delegations to which Kerry referred were communist. Neither included the U.S. allied, South Vietnamese or any members of the U.S. delegation. The Democratic Republic of Vietnam was the government of the North Vietnamese communists, and the Provisional Revolutionary Government (PVR) was an arm of the North Vietnamese government that included the Vietcong. Kerry did meet face-to-face with the PVR's negotiator Madam Nguyen Thi Binh, according to his presidential campaign spokesman Michael Meehan. Madam Binh's peace plan was being proposed by the North Vietnamese communists as a way to bring a quick end to the war. But Corsi alleged that Kerry's meeting with Madam Binh and the government of North Vietnam was a direct violation of U.S. law. "In [Kerry's] first meeting in 1970, meeting with Madam Binh, Kerry was still a naval reservist - not only a U.S. citizen, but a naval reservist - stepping outside the boundaries to meet with one of the principle figures of our enemy in Vietnam, Madam Binh, and the Viet Cong at the same time. [Former Nixon administration aide Henry] Kissinger was trying to negotiate with them formally," Corsi told CNSNews.com. Corsi's recent essay, titled "Kerry and the Paris Peace Talks," published on wintersoldier.com, details Kerry's meetings and the possible violations of U.S. law. Corsi also asserted that by 1971, Kerry might have violated another law by completely adopting the rhetoric and objectives of the North Vietnamese communists. Definition of Treason "Article three: Section three [of the U.S. Constitution], which defines treason, says you cannot give support to the enemy in time of war, and here you have Kerry giving a press conference in Washington on July 22, 1971 (a year after his meeting with the communist delegations in Paris) advocating the North Vietnamese peace plan and saying that is what President Nixon ought to accept," Corsi explained. "If Madam Binh had been there herself at that press conference, she would have said exactly what Kerry said. The only difference is she would not have done it with a Boston accent," Corsi said. The 7 Point Plan created by the North Vietnamese communists was nothing more than a "surrender" for the U.S., according to Corsi. "You don't advocate that [7 point] plan unless you are on the communist side. It was seen as surrender. [The U.S.] would have had to pay reparations and agree that we essentially lost the war," Corsi said. Communist Shill "Kerry was openly advocating that the communist position was correct and that we were wrong. He had become a spokesman for the communist party," Corsi added. Kerry's presidential campaign did not return repeated phone calls seeking comment, but campaign spokesman Michael Meehan told the Boston Globe in March, "Kerry had no role whatsoever in the Paris peace talks or negotiations. "He did not engage in any negotiations and did not attend any session of the talks," Meehan added. 'From Their Point of View' Kerry "went to Paris on a private trip, where he had one brief meeting with Madam Binh and others. In an effort to find facts, he learned that status of the peace talks from their point of view and about any progress in resolving the conflict, particularly as it related to the fate of the POWs," Meehan added. Kerry was reportedly on his honeymoon with his first wife, Julia Thorne, when he met with the communist delegations. But Corsi does not accept the Kerry campaign's explanation. "Meehan made it sound like they were just there on a honeymoon and they got a meeting with Madam Bin, but not every American honeymooner got to meet with Madam Binh. Unless you had a political objective and they identified you as somebody as sympathetic, you were not going to get invited to a meeting with Madam Binh," Corsi said. "Kerry has skirted with the issue of violating these laws," Corsi added. Sen. Kerry's presidential campaign is "trying to fudge on the issue because they don't want to come clean on it entirely." Copyright CNSNews.com |
| I could keep this up all night |
ive no doubt you could. so how do you explain why nixon (who clearly disliked kerry and can be heard saying so on tape in the oval office; in fact, disliked him enough to condemn him to a lifetime of being stalked by a psychopath loser stalker like john o'neil) and j edgar hoover (whom we know to have assigned a team of fbi agents to keep kerry under surveilance) never even tried to obtain an indictment for charges that are so well evidenced you could keep quoting them all night?
lemme guess...cuz its all bullshit speculation and nothing was done in secret that could be considered negotiating with a foreign power? or the kerry family bought em off?
in the meantime, while youve been fulminating for the past 30 years about something that woulda been thrown outta any court in the land including the kangeroo court presided over by the honorable judge hoffman, richard m nixon was elected president in part because his campaign DID interfere with the paris negotiations causing the war to drag on for another 5 fuckin years and resulting in the deaths of 20,000 more american military personnel who might otherwise still be alive today.
gimme a break 
| ive no doubt you could. so how do you explain why nixon (who clearly disliked kerry and can be heard saying so on tape in the oval office; in fact, disliked him enough to condemn him to a lifetime of being stalked by a psychopath loser stalker like john o'neil) and j edgar hoover (whom we know to have assigned a team of fbi agents to keep kerry under surveilance) never even tried to obtain an indictment for charges that are so well evidenced you could keep quoting them all night? |
Now you jumped on the kook bandwagon. What DR says is true, whether you want to believe it or not. He did provide docuementation. Nixon did not sick O'Niell on Kerry, that was O'Neill's doing himself. Nixon just did not try to reign him in. J Edgar was dead by then, so that was a non factor as well. The FBI may have been hounding him, and probably was. But then so were many other anti--war protestors of the time.
You assign Nixon so much credit for sabotaging the Peace talks, yet offer no basis in proof for it.
In a nut shell, you are rapidly approaching kook status in that anything about a liberal must be false, and any innuendo or allegation about a conservative must be true.
| Reply #30 By: kingbee - 12/3/2004 3:55:22 AM I could keep this up all night ive no doubt you could. so how do you explain why nixon (who clearly disliked kerry and can be heard saying so on tape in the oval office; in fact, disliked him enough to condemn him to a lifetime of being stalked by a psychopath loser stalker like john o'neil) and j edgar hoover (whom we know to have assigned a team of fbi agents to keep kerry under surveilance) never even tried to obtain an indictment for charges that are so well evidenced you could keep quoting them all night? lemme guess...cuz its all bullshit speculation and nothing was done in secret that could be considered negotiating with a foreign power? or the kerry family bought em off? |
| Nixon did not sick O'Niell on Kerry, that was O'Neill's doing himself |
your command of facts sometimes rivals your colleaque drmiler. according to a houston chronicle article about oneil dated 3/31/04:
In 1971, O'Neill squared off against Kerry on the Dick Cavett Show in a 90-minute, televised forum in which the two Vietnam War veterans sparred over the U.S. role in Southeast Asia.
President Nixon and top aide Charles Colson had taken a keen interest in O'Neill as part of their effort to discredit Kerry and the anti-war movement, according to memos and tapes in the National Archives. A clean-cut Naval Academy graduate, O'Neill was viewed by Nixon's team as an effective messenger against Kerry, who was causing the administration headaches as the leader of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War.
In a series of memos, Nixon aide Colson, who later went to prison for his role in the Watergate scandal, referred to the administration's efforts to promote O'Neill and to challenge Kerry to debate him.
On June 15, 1971, Colson noted that Kerry first turned down a debate offer with O'Neill and that he was "beginning to take a tremendous beating in the press."
"Let's destroy this young demagogue before he becomes another Ralph Nader," Colson wrote about Kerry.
Colson wrote that he arranged an Oval Office meeting between Nixon and O'Neill on June 16, to boost the morale of O'Neill, who had become disillusioned because of the hostile reception he received during other television appearances.
O'Neill, who had flown up from his hometown of San Antonio, spent about 40 minutes chatting with Nixon and National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger about the war and its opponents.
Nixon said he understood that O'Neill was "the guy to take brickbats when you go on some of these TV shows." He encouraged the young veteran to continue his fight.
"Give it to 'em. Give it to 'em. You can do it," said Nixon, according to a tape of the meeting.
O'Neill mentioned to the president that he had supported Democrat Hubert Humphrey against Nixon in the 1968 presidential election. But he was critical of the beating that Nixon was taking in the press and advised the president that when reporters "ask you totally stupid questions about which they always seem to ask, laugh at them, and I think the whole country will laugh with you."
The next day Colson wrote a memo to top Nixon aide H.R. Haldeman, pronouncing the session a success:
"O'Neill went out charging like a tiger, has agreed that he will appear anytime, anywhere that we program him and was last seen walking up West Executive Avenue mumbling to himself that he had just been with the most magnificent man he had ever met in his life.
| J Edgar was dead by then, so that was a non factor as well. |
apparently i--and the rest of the world--am incorrect in believing that hoover died on may 2, 1972.
| In a nut shell, you are rapidly approaching kook status in that anything about a liberal must be false, and any innuendo or allegation about a conservative must be true. |
in a nutshell (strange turn of phrase considering where you went with that), if im losing my mind, its due in no small part to incorrect statements about something as easily checked as the date of j edgar hoover's too-long-delayed departure from this vale of bliss or as well documented as nixon's meetings with oneil.
Reply #35 By: kingbee - 12/4/2004 3:18:51 AM In a nut shell, you are rapidly approaching kook status in that anything about a liberal must be false, and any innuendo or allegation about a conservative must be true. in a nutshell (strange turn of phrase considering where you went with that), if im losing my mind, its due in no small part to incorrect statements about something as easily checked as the date of j edgar hoover's too-long-delayed departure from this vale of bliss or as well documented as nixon's meetings with oneil. |
| Just what in the heck does ONeil have to do with what I posted |
i was responding to the other doctor's claims.
| your command of facts sometimes rivals your colleaque drmiler |
sorry for the confusion. it shoulda read 'your command of facts sometimes rivals that of your colleage, drmiler'
| And I do not know why Nixon did not pursue this |
you keep overlooking the obvious. nixon may have been an asshole but he wasnt a stupid asshole. he knew there was no basis for an indictment.
| What the hell does any of this have to do with the original moral values/religious faith topic? |
well, the moral of this story
the moral of this song
is simply that one should never be
where one does not belong
so if you see your neighbor carryin somethin
help him with his load
and dont go mistaking paradise
for that house across the road
the ballad of frankie lee and judas priest--bobby zimmerman
Reply #40 By: little_whip - 12/4/2004 7:49:40 AM For fucks sake....this WAS an interesting topic....but so far gone now that i wont even bother trying to respond....nixon. hoover, kerry, vietnam.....blah blah blah. What the hell does any of this have to do with the original moral values/religious faith topic? |
| your command of facts sometimes rivals your colleaque drmiler. according to a houston chronicle article about oneil dated 3/31/04: |
Your post just made my statement. O'neill was on Kerry before Nixon got involved, or cared. I stated that Nixon encouraged him, which you quoted text indicates, but he did not 'sic' him on Kerry. You lost, so take back your incorrect snide comment if you dare.
| apparently i--and the rest of the world--am incorrect in believing that hoover died on may 2, 1972. |
I did not mean to imply that Hoover died before Kerrymade a fool of himself, but he was not hounding Kerry like you said as he was in ill health and died during the whole sordid mess. Each time you try to refute me, you just wind up proving my point. Or, correctly pointing out an ambiguity that I am glad to correct for the record.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.