Idea from twitter posting

He spoke about how he wanted to do 'little forests' because the fields looked barren.  There should be MOSTLY forrest throughout the world, unless of course u custom built the world, because the world is just getting back to a human/fallen population and after the war forrests would have been growing for 100 years or w/e.

2,974 views 5 replies
Reply #1 Top

The world has been dead. Not just people (otherwise we wouldn't need to bring life back to the land with channelers to make it habitable for people). Forests would have largely died out, too... So whatever forests there are would (story-wise, anyways) be fairly new growth along with the few holdout old growths. Kind of like Fangorn Forest in the LoTR. Fangorn Forest used to be part of the Great Greenwood, and used to encompass a huge area, including most of Gondor and I think even included the Mirkwood.

Reply #2 Top

Good point.

Reply #3 Top

I agree entirely with the "little forest" idea.   I would have suggested the exact same thing.  (I would also suggest something other than "field" to be the empty space.   Things like rock formations (light rocks, so rough terrain), marsh (or just muddy areas), highlands, rolling hills, and the list goes on.  (I vaguely recall a thread on the subject)

Reply #4 Top

As pigeonpigeon said, the entire world was scorched and had it's lifeforce drained from it. Huge forests everywhere wouldn't make any sense at all.

I'd be hesitant to have them spread "here and there", too - but that's just the apocalypse in me talking.

Reply #5 Top

Actually, I think "little forests" ared the way to go here: the world has been scorched to within an inch of its life. Surviving outside of the "channeler zone" is tough. Therefore, you would get areas of scraggly, unhealthy trees, that in my opinion fit the exact description of a "little forest"