Paladin77 Paladin77

Why is evolution so important to some people

Why is evolution so important to some people

The reason is simple; Darwin’s theory on evolution is the linchpin for all the things that people wish to use in order to make a better world.

Margaret Sanger figured it out years ago. Survival of the fittest meant getting rid of the not so fit. Planned Parenthood was the subtle logical step in that direction. When that did not work as well as planned we came up with ZPG or zero population growth. That is having a disastrous effect in Europe because they bought into it and being sophisticated idiots in America tried to bring it in vogue here. It also fell flat then we had abortion on demand. Well that is not working out as well as planned either.

 

Survival of the fittest was supposed to mean that people of good stock would survive as the lower forms of human life faded. If this sounds like something you may have heard before you have. It is called eugenics. Ms. Sanger was a strong believer in eugenics, now can you think of others that believed in eugenics? How about Adolph Hitler and crew? How about the democrat party back in the 1920’s? A little forced sterilization never hurt anyone right? Well we are looking at it again only with religious implications. If you are not a Muslim then you are not the fittest in their mind. Jews, Christians and other non believers need to be converted or exterminated to make room for the good people of the world.

 

Before you get your panties in a wad allow me to say that not all Germans were blood thirsty Nazi’s not all planned parenthood people believed in eugenics either, just like not all democrats of the 1920’s believed in it. The 2.5 million democrats that did believe in eugenics are mostly gone now. Only two Kennedy’s openly believed in eugenics and only one of them is still alive. The lies used to keep the desire going are still around. Allow me to point to them.

 

ZPG was needed because when the world reached 5 billion people there would not be enough food to feed everyone. The only way to save mankind was to reduce having children that would use up our natural resources. People went out and had themselves sterilized in order to set the example for others in order to save mankind.

Let’s ignore that we are now at 6 billion and we still have stuff to waste.

 

Abortion on demand was supposed to help poor people make ends meet because they would not have to feed as many people. All the religious people were against this, and many still are. So they attack religion in order to make killing your own child okay. It is the moral thing to do.

 

The Nazi’s pushed selective breeding in order to make more good people while killing and outlawing the marriage and birth of bad people. The world was not happy with this idea yet eugenics is still the goal of fools.

 

It all hinges on the belief of evolution to make the argument a scientific one rather than a moral one. A woman is not killing her child she is removing unwanted tissue. Life has not begun until the child is born according to the believers of this silliness. Yet if I kill a pregnant woman I am charged with two murders. Don’t believe me what was Scott Peterson charged and convicted with? Two counts of murder. The pro abortion people were not happy but could do nothing without openly supporting the murder and once again abandoning the women they claim to represent.

 

This is why evolution is such a hot topic. If you support evolution you are supporting eugenics even if you don’t know it or agree with it because the ones that are pushing eugenics are happy to have what the Soviets called “useful idiots” to make their numbers bigger. Evolution, and global climate change and a host of other things are being used to push radical ideas that will destroy the human race in ways they have not even come close to calculating.

 

Anyway that is my take on the topic what is your belief?

90,748 views 103 replies
Reply #101 Top

Evolution....the revival of a 6 year old thread is proof intelligence is a product of it...and it's not as common as it should be...;p

The world has been quietly evolving [shock-horror] while this has lain dormant.

Humans have evolved PAST this topic in the interim...;p

Reply #102 Top

Gregor mendal was a precursor to genetic engineering not evolution. He was describing a plants way to pass on traits. This does not contradict creation. This nearly explains that the traits are in something that is passed on. He had observed that sdpome traits are masked for generations to come out in small scales. 

You keep bringing upcancer which is a damaged cell that reproduces into the same cell spreading throughout the body. Are you sure that the genes are new or are they damaged. In order to back this you can produce beneficial cancers. I'm assuming from your comment that the identicle cancer cell can become asperm or egg, so this cancer can be inherited. Matter of fact can you post beneficial mutations that introduce new genes. Retardation or cancer is not benificial . I mean actually observed by scientists. How come every class I take on evolution always start out with biogenises. 

About titsi flies. How is a leg sticking out an eye, or a fly with no wings, or two sets of wings new DNA. Can this new species survive out of a cage. These guys can't fly. 

I also don't like abortion or genocide.

do any of the people you cited don't believe a species can't evolve outside it's family. I know mendal didn't.

Question how comegenitic engineers keep having to introduce wild strains of the food they engineer. I mean the original unengineered version. If they don't it becomes inedible. To date engineers can't engineer beyond a certain limit on the code of foods no matter how hard they try. Hears your limit you claim don't exist. Proved by genetic engineering. Current requirement of living accepted by most scientists require genetics. Nano bacteria is currently considered not alive. Organic doesn't always mean living in case of organic molecules which are abundant in non living sources.

One of the biggest problems is radioactive dating. Do you remember when carbon dating was proven wrong. I rememberI was actually in a physics class. Two parts actually. First they found out if it worked it would be one two hundredth the date they thought it was. Still waiting for them to fix the dating.

The real problem is water. If any water was added or taken away from what is being dated then it wouldn't work.

I wasn't to point out that god mentioned kind of species. To me and other christian theologans this means like family. Except man which is different than the animals. Their is no reason why god didn't use a code which is genetics. Even though we are apart from animals we still have similar programming.

Reply #103 Top

admiralWillyWilber,

Thank you for adding your voice to the discussion. Jafo grumbles....however, as long as JoeUser is a discussion blog...then let's re-open the discussion.   

 

Quoting admiralWillyWilber, reply 102

Gregor mental was a precursor to genetic engineering not evolution. He was describing a plants way to pass on traits. This does not contradict creation.
End of admiralWillyWilber's quote

Gregor Johann Mendel (1822-1884) was a priest and one of the greatest biologists on the 19th century. His work firmly laid the basis for modern Genetics---laws of heredity which effectively destroy the basis for Darwin's species Evolution.

His experiments clearly showed that one species could not transmute into another one. A genetic barrier exists that can't be bridged.

We know know that genetic barrier is DNA.