Saddam Captured

Thank You for publicly saying what I have been saying all along,

I'm not trying to be sarcastic here, but I really do feel strangely happy that he was finally captured. I didn't think I would be that happy about it.

This new "look" of Saddam certainly takes away some of the terror, doesn't it?

What happened in Kosovo was one of the darkest hours for the UN maybe even worse then Rwanda. In Rwanda the UN simply allowed the slaughter to happen, in Kosovo they were an accessory to the massacre because they disarmed the massacre victims. The UN told the people that they would find safety in a UN “safe zone,” everybody believed that their safety was assured by the UN, so they laid down weapons that could have been used for self defense, and flocked to the protection of the UN safe zone. When Serbian police marched into srebrenica, which became the worst massacre on European soil since the third Reich, the UN handed 6000 defenseless men over for execution. The Serbian’s needed fuel for the bulldozers they used to plow dead bodies into the ground, according to reports, the Dutch UN peacekeepers helped them out.

Hmm well a mixed feeling here I feel sorry for the guy since he could have done good and not bad and also feel happy since now the iraqi people can look towards freedom

I woke up this morning, grabbed my cellphone, and through the wonders of 3G, downloaded the latest news from Iraq. Said the first headline, "Saddam Captured in Raid". Said the Jewish Zionist American installed administrator, Paul Bremmer, "Ladies and Gentleman, we got him. The tyrant is a prisoner." And so began an expected discourse in "illuminati justice" in the Jewish model: while the world will hail the capture of Saddam Hussein, the King of the Jews, Ariel "Shalom" Sharon, and architect of current Zionist global terror, remains a free man while his agents in America and the world over raise toasts to their engineering of the overthrow of a sovereign nation through the Jewish inspired doctrine of "unilateral force", otherwise known as "pre-emptive strikes", which is the Jewish way of saying, "If you dont like our rule, we reserve the right to do anything we want to you, and in the process, prove that we care nothing for rule of law in the world."

To drive this point home, during the past 48 hours, we have witnessed Jews kill another six people in a raid on the town of Rafah. One partisan was killed, and another 5 civilians mowed down in the Jewish Aktion.

Meanwhile, the Jewish state threw the world a "bone", and declared in a statement yesterday, that Sharon will not be making any efforts unilaterally to revive peace talks. Perhaps we was tipped off by Jewish traitors in the American intelligence services that Saddam was to be captured and hence feels that if unrest in Iraq dies down, there will be less pressure on Jews in America to give in to global Jewish desires to expand their racist idiologies, a cornerstone of the Jewish political infrastructure.

And yet again today, we find that Jews murdered unlilaterally another victim in the Middle East. So while one tyrant, the creation of the American CIA, has been captured, the defacto rulers of the American democracy, the Jewish people, continue to have a free reign to spread a comparable form of terror to the peoples whom the Jewish people seek to lord over.

Yet inspite of all this, what was rather laughable on one end of the spectrum, and shameless equally on the other, is the clear invokation of the Protocols of Zion by President Bush in his speech to the nation. This was so blatantly obvious that he might as well have come out and simply said the truth: 9-11 was a Jewish engineered coup to take the United States to war. Now that we have Saddam, you can forget about all the lies we used to bring about this war. Afterall, the rule of law is not a Jewish concept: Richard Perle, the "Dark Angel", said so himself, "International Law stood in the way to doing what was right."

Of course, that Richard Perle equally invoked the Protocols of Zion should not be a surprise. From Protocol 1, 12,

RIGHT IS MIGHT
12. Our right lies in force. The word "right" is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you.

13. Where does right begin? Where does it end?

In otherwords, the Illuminati, which in this case is shown to be the Jewish elite who are ruling America through the power of appointment, believe clearly in a "concept", or a "philosophy" that is equally held by virtually every nation states highest levels of control: that is, what is a "right" is truly arbitrary and the domain of the ruling power. When Saddam was seen as an impediment to Jewish racist idiologies and refused to cooperate on various economic projects as the Aqaba Pipeline which would have been a windfall to the ruling Jewish elite, then what was "right" simply became an abstract absurdity.

Following International Laws, then, equally becomes an abstract absurdity as shown by the ruling Jewish elite power structure. Their actions prove this. Perle says matter of factly, "International Law stood in the way of doing what was "right"". Yet as we can see by the subsequent events set in motion, what was "right" really amounted to the invokation in the Protocols of Zion, wherein the most basic premise is:
12. Our right lies in force. The word "right" is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you.

Look back equally to Afghanistan. Said the American elite via spokesman George Bush, "Hand us Osama." The Taliban said, "show us proof first that he has engaged in these crimes you say, and then we shall discuss handing him over." In truth, there was no interest in truth and doing "what was right", which was to present to the American people (it is we who are waging war and thus expending capital and blood on behalf of these Jewish elitists in power), but equally to the world. Again, Afghanistan showed a basic Jewish Illuminatus concept, and that is simple: what is right is whatever Jews claim is right, and anything less is absurd, for when one has absolute power, the idea of what is "right" truly boils down to the Jewish idiology (via the Illuminatus equally) of simply giving "me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you."

The basic premise of this doctrine hints at the amoral nature of the ruling elite as a process of politics, but since Jews are so vocal in their words, it is often much easier to highlight their use of these strategies and techniques.

"Right", and with it, "justice", is purely an abstract absurdity which, like the wind, blows wherever public opinion will find traction upon the concepts being advanced. Retribution for Saddam is a "right" of the Iraqi people, but we can assume that holding Wolfowitz and Perle responsible for all the chaos wrought to the people of Iraq who otherwise would not have had to worry about Saddam and who now suffer far more than when Saddam was in power, presumeably will have no rights.

Justice, therefore becomes an abstract absurdity, equally.

That is the underlying lesson of this whole so called "war on terror". Jewish terror is "self defense" because it is passed off as a "doctrine", and that "doctrine" is known as "pre-emptive strikes". Of course, the reality is that the underlying concept is, "Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you."

What Jews are telling the world is that if the Palestinians do not capitulate to them unconditionally, then by the racist American Jewish infrastructure arming the racist Israeli political infrastructure via Noahidism and its political constutuencies, then Jews can maintain their strategy clearly being invoked from the Protocols of Zion.

So now we turn to President Bush's statements on the capture of Saddam Hussein and the impending "justice" which presumably will be borne out of this capture. Whatever "justice" is meted out is: noone in the intelligentsia opposed to Jewish racial idiologies, Noahidims, and the efforts by this political group to cause so much death and destruction to the American Armed Services and the Iraqi people will be deluded into believing that any semblence of Justice will be done till the America Jewish elite that brought this tradgedy to the fore is equally brought to trial and convicted, which includes first and foremost, Richard Perle, who has admitted that the invasion was against International Law in favor of doing what is "right", which is purely a Jewish abstract aburdity, as is clearly evident.

Said Bush, "It marks the end of the road for him and all who killed and bullied in his name." Again we are left to mock the hippocracy. What of 36 years of bullying and killing by Jews, and the clear efforts by America's Jews to prevent this system of criminality from being brought to the surface by constantly attacking those of us opposed to Jewish bullying and killing? Does this give us a "right" to utilize Jewish techniques to oppose Jewish idiologies? Clearly if we were Jews, there would and could be no reservations about exercising our "pre-emptive rights", and that includes pre-emptive strikes against Noahidism.

Yet we live in a world of laws which preclude such actions and perhaps rightly so. It is clear that Jews and their elite do not adhere to such standards of conduct: hence American soldiers are being killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, while Jewish leaders hail the capture as if this capture was predicated upon any semblance of morality and legality. It was predicated on what is "right" set against Jewish paradigms which, thankfully, most of the civilised world is opposed to.

But Bush's hippocracy did not stop there. His rather arrogant invokation of the Protocols of Zion (one has to wonder if he needs a new speech writer who is not so painfully obvious) shows that the American people and the people of the Middle East are in for a long series of protracted wars on behalf of this rather arrogant and mindless elite.

Said Bush,

I also have a message for all Americans: The capture of Saddam Hussein does not mean the end of violence in Iraq. We still face terrorists who would rather go on killing the innocent than accept the rise of liberty in the heart of the Middle East. Such men are a direct threat to the American people, and they will be defeated.

We've come to this moment through patience and resolve and focused action. And that is our strategy moving forward. The war on terror is a different kind of war, waged capture by capture, cell by cell, and victory by victory. Our security is assured by our perseverance and by our sure belief in the success of liberty. And the United States of America will not relent until this war is won.

It should be abundantly clear to all of you that the Jewish elite in power in America has no interest, like their racist Israeli's, of seeking a peace. This statement shows a more sinister plan in the offing, and that is a takeover by the American Jewish and Zionist Elite of the Middle East, and it is clear that the Protocols of Zion, and the strategies contained within, is being invoked.

Step 1: Declare what is a right and then use absolute force to bring this right into existence. (from Protocol 1)

Step 2 (From Protocol 1, 25)

WE SHALL END LIBERTY
25. Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll- parrots who, from all sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the GOYIM, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractedness; did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political - to all those things the GOYIM paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on, the meaning of the dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause.

26. In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of the GOYIM, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the GOYA States. As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph: it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card - the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the GOYIM, that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had against us. On the ruins of the eternal and genealogical aristocracy of the GOYIM we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force.

27. Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men, whom we wanted, we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material needs of man; and each one of these human weaknesses, taken alone, is sufficient to paralyze initiative, for it hands over the will of men to the disposition of him who has bought their activities.

28. The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade the mob in all countries that their government is nothing but the steward of the people who are the owners of the country, and that the steward may be replaced like a worn-out glove.

29. It is this possibility of replacing the representatives of the people which has placed at our disposal, and, as it were, given us the power of appointment.

The conquoring of nation states and societies by Illuminati elements is always the same, and the first step is to destroy a society through a variety of stunts that destroys the underlying capitalisation of the nation state. It is difficult to deny that since Rumsfelds trip to Bagdad in 1983, Iraq went from a creditor nation to a debtor nation with a national debt of over US$120 billion.

Having destroyed the country financially, and now having control of it through the "Principle of What is Right", which simply means one can use whatever is in ones power to takeover what one desires, the next step is to then seek forgiveness of debts under the guise of "helping the country and people get back on their feet". The real truth of the issue is that once one has control, the new ruling order seeks to maintain that control via a virtual theft of others resources by creating a situation where the underlying thesis is that "others should forgive debt" so that the people can get back on their feet.

Yet all the while, they who often (and Iraq is no different) are responsible for bringing about the debt, either through internationally monetary manuevers, persuasion of "allies" to advance credits (often under the guise of defense via engineered wars as was the Iran Iraq and Gulf War's), what happens is that the old cliche of "OPM", or "other peoples money" is used by the target people who are seeking control of a given piece of nation state real estate.

Hence in this case, France, Saudi Arabia, Russia, China, all countries who advanced credits to the former Iraqi regime are being asked to forgive debt on behalf of the current rulers (Zionist America) so that the Zionists can exercise their "right", or the forceful conquest of Iraq, free of all encumbrances, or "national debt."

Yet all of this cannot be accomplished without a simple yet critical component: BLOOD.

This is where the phraseology of : Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men, whom we wanted, we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind..."

...comes into play. The "spell" contained in the word LIBERTY is very powerful. It is, like "right", and "freedom", regarded as "abstractedness" in the Illuminati way of thought, or "abstract absurdity" in the more precise rendering as a form set against human mind. As is clearly elucidated in the Protocols of the Illuminati (Zion). That the Protocols of Zion is an Illuminatus document more than a purely "Jewish" document is self evident in the very words invoked in this above Protocol set.

25. Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll- parrots who, from all sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob.

In some respects, George Bush himself is a "poll parrot" who is carrying away with his irrationality, the very well being of the world at large, and with it, freedom of the individual. George Bush (and with him the Zionist elites who are the fountain from which he comes), are promising you one thing: more war, and all in the name of "Liberty". Like a bait, indeed, those with uncritical thinking latch onto these formulas and never take the time to analyse them in the abstract purpose for which they are brought to the fore.

You see, what is known by the Elite (and that is Jew and non Jew alike) who adhere to Jewish idiologies known as Jehovianism, that mankind will rebel and fight even against Nature and the laws therein when motivated by the words Liberty and Freedom. These words, when invoked at the most powerful layer of human political conciousness, are not spoken out of an irrational calculation.

The goal is an unending war on behalf of Jews as they seek to bring about their Noahidist state. The means of distraction is a "war on terror" which is being implemented by they who are the fountain of terror, the Jewish elite and its political constituency who lacks the analytical skills and training to see the forces in play.

It is they, who like "poll parrots", who are at the fore of preaching Liberty and Equality and Freedom, and behind the scenes are the puppeteers who pull the strings of these marionettes in the desire to bring about a one world order predicated on a Jewish world order that is subjugated to the Jewish elite via Noahidism.

Afterall, George Bush said very clearly,

May God bless the people of Iraq, and may God bless America. Thank you.

END 12:18 P.M. EST (6+6:6+6+6)


Since when has the blessings of this god brought unto the peoples of the world peace? He who decieves does so out of the ignorance of the people whom are being decieved.

Anthony, that was Bosnia. Not Kosovo.

angel - you make me sick. Brad, delete this filth off your comments, please.

Your right that was in Bosnia, it would seem that all the news servers are so overwhelmed this morning that there crashing, BBC, CNN, Yahoo are stripped of pictures and slow to load, and sometimes wont load.

I found much right with your thoughts and definitely feel that as a "Bush hater" my rational thoughts are conflicted (I find the use of "clouded" to be negative in connotation) at times. For instance, upon hearing of Saddam's capture I felt thankful and distraught. Thankful, that such a horrible person had been found and the Iraqi's chance of succeeding in this war we are all "slogging" through had increased. Alas, I also felt distraught and conflicted in the fact that our finding Saddam and ultimately Osama Bin Laden will more than likely get Bush re-elected. In a time when our Country needs to be unified, I find myself unable to reconcile with Bush's blatant deaf ear to half of this country. His "my way or the highway" dogma does little to bring us American's closer together. I value my freedom and my patriotism and even if I don't agree with your point of view, I generally make the effort to listen and try to understand where you are coming from.

As to "the world coming to grips with the horror's of Saddam's Iraq", Are there not many who still say that the holocaust never happend? People will find justification where they may and focus on what makes them right and therefore not subject to scrutiny or other points of view.

For the record I view the killing of civillians of all races and religions with equal abhorrence, but for some reason it seems to bother me more when it is a friend or family member.

LOL! Someone took the "protocols of zion" seriously! LOLOL!!!

Excerpt from "THE LONDON TIMES", Tuesday, August 16, 1921, pp. 9, 10

"JEWISH WORLD PLOT."
___________


AN EXPOSURE.
________


THE SOURCE OF THE PROTOCOLS.
__________


TRUTH AT LAST.


The so-called "Protocols of the Elders of Sion" were published in London last year under the title of "The Jewish Peril."

This book is a translation of a book published in Russia in 1905, by Sergei Nilus, a government official, who professed to have received from a friend a copy of a summary of the minutes of a secret meeting, held in Paris, by a Jewish organization that was plotting to overthrow civilization in order to establish a Jewish world state.

These "Protocols" attracted little attention until after the Russian Revolution of 1917, when the appearance of the Bolshevists, among whom were many Jews, professing and practicing political doctrines that in some points resembled those advocated in the "Protocols," led many to believe that Nilus’ alleged discovery was genuine. The "Protocols" were widely discussed and translated into several European languages. Their authenticity has been frequently attacked and many arguments have been adduced for the theory that they are a forgery.

In the following articles our Constantinople Correspondent for the first time presents conclusive proof that the document is in the main a clumsy plagiarism. He has forwarded us a copy of the French book from which the plagiarism is made. The British Museum has a complete copy of the book, which is entitled, "Dialogue aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu, ou la Politique de Machiavel au XIX. Siècle. Par un Contemporain," and was published at Brussels in 1865. Shortly after its publication the author, Maurice Joly, a Paris lawyer and publicist, was arrested by the police of Napoleon III. and sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment.

______________________________________

A LITERARY FORGERY.

(From Our Constantinople Correspondent.)

"There is one thing about Constantinople that is worth your while to remember," said a diplomatist to the writer in 1908. "If you only stay here long enough you will meet many men who matter, and you may find the key to many strange secrets." Yet I must confess that when the discovery which is the theme of these articles was communicated to me I was at first incredulous. Mr. X who brought me the evidence was convinced.

"Read this book through," he said, "and you will find irrefutable proof that the ‘Protocols of the Learned Elders of Sion’ is a plagiarism."

Mr. X., who does not wish his real name to be known, is a Russian landowner with English connexions. Orthodox by religion, he is in Political opinion a Constitutional Monarchist. He came here as a refugee after the final failure of the White cause in South Russia. He had long been interested in the Jewish question as far as it concerned Russia, had studied the "Protocols," and during the period of Denikin’s ascendancy had made investigations with the object of discovering whether any occult "Masonic" organization, such as the "Protocols" speak of, existed in Southern Russia. The only such organization was a Monarchist one. The discovery of the key to the problem of the "Protocols" came to him by chance.

THE SWISS ORIGINAL.

A few months ago he bought a number of old books from a former officer of the "Okhrana" (Political Police) who had fled to Constantinople. Among these books was a small volume in French, lacking the title page, with dimensions of 5 ½ in. by 3 ¾ in. It had been cheaply rebound. On the leather back is printed in Latin capitals the word Joli. The preface, entitled "Simple avertissement," is dated Geneva, October 15, 1864. The book contains 324 pages, of which numbers 315-322 inclusive follow page 24 in the only copy known to Mr. X, perhaps owing to a mistake when the book was rebound. Both the paper and the type are characteristic of the "sixties and seventies" of the last century. These details are given in the hope that they may lead to the discovery of the title of the book [Note from Emperor's Clothes: The introduction, above, states that Publisher had located the text in the British Museum. Today you can now buy it from amazon.com].

Mr. X believes it must be rare, since, had it not been so, the "Protocols" would have speedily been recognized as a plagiarism by anyone who had read the original.

That the latter is a "fake" could not be maintained for an instant by anyone who had seen it. Its original possessor, the old Okhrana Officer, did not remember where he obtained it, and attached no importance to it. Mr. X, glancing at it one day, was struck by a resemblance between a passage which had caught his eye and a phrase in the French edition of the "Protocols" (Edition de la Vieille France, 1920, 5, Rue du Préaux-Cleres, 5, Paris 7th Arrondissement). He followed up the clue, and soon realized that the "Protocols" were to a very large extent as much a paraphrase of the Geneva original as the published version of a War Office or Foreign Office telegram is a paraphrase of the ciphered original. (1)

Before receiving the book from Mr. X, I was, as I have said, incredulous. I did not believe that Sergei Nilus’s "Protocols" were authentic; they explained too much by the theory of a vast Jewish conspiracy. Professor Nilus’s account of how they were obtained was too melodramatic to be credible, and it was hard to believe that real "Learned Elders of Sion" would not have produced a more intelligent political scheme than the crude and theatrical subtilties of the Protocols. But I could not have believed, had I not seen, that the writer who supplied Nilus with his originals was a careless and shameless plagiarist.

The Geneva book is a very thinly-veiled attack on the despotism of Napoleon III in the form of a series of 25 dialogues divided into four parts. The speakers are Montesquieu and Machiavelli. In the brief preface to his book the anonymous author points out that it contains passages which are applicable to all Governments, "but it particularly personifies a political system which has not varied in its application, for a single day since the fatal and alas! Too distant date when it was enthroned." Its references to the "Haussmannisation" of Paris, to the repressive measures and policy of the French Emperor, to his wasteful financial system, to his foreign wars, to his use of secret societies in foreign policy (cf., his notorious relations with the Carbonari) and his suppression of them in France, to his relations with the Vatican, and to his control of the Press are unmistakable.

MACHIAVELLI-NAPOLEON.

The Geneva Book, or as it will henceforth be called the Geneva Dialogues, opens with the meeting of the spirits of Montesquieu and Machiavelli on a desolate beach in the world of shades. After a lengthy exchange of civilities Montesquieu asks Machiavelli why from an ardent Republican he had become the author of "The Prince" and "the founder of that sombre school of thoughts which has made all crowned heads disciples, but which is well fitted to justify the worst crimes of tyranny." Machiavelli replies that he is a realist and proceeds to justify the teaching of "The Prince," and to explain its applicability to the Western European States of 1864.

In the first six "Geneva Dialogues" Montesquieu is given a chance of argument of which he avails himself. In the seventh dialogue, which corresponds to the fifth, sixth, seventh, and part of the eighth "Protocols," he gives Machiavelli permission to describe at length how he would solve the problem of stabilizing political societies "incessantly disturbed by the spirit of anarchy and revolution." Henceforth Machiavelli or in reality Napoleon III., speaking through Machiavelli, has the lion’s share of the dialogue. Montesquieu’s contributions thereto become more and more exclamatory; he is profoundly shocked by Machiavelli-Napoleon’s defence of an able and ruthless dictatorship, but his counter-arguments grow briefer and weaker. At times, indeed, the author of "L’Espirit des Lois" is made to cut as poor a figure as—parvum componere magno—does Dr. Watson when he attempts to talk criminology to Sherlock Holmes.

DIALOGUE AND "PROTOCOL."

The "Protocols" follow almost the same order as the Dialogues. Dialogues 1-17 generally correspond with "Protocols" 1-19. There are a few exceptions to this. One is in the 18th "Protocol," where, together with paraphrases of passages from the 17th Dialogue ("Geneva Dialogues," pp. 216, 217) there, is an echo of a passage in the 25th "Geneva Dialogue," viz. :–"Quand le malheureux est opprimé il dit ‘si le Roi le savait’; Quand on veut se venger, qu on espère un secours, on dit ‘le Roi le saura.’" This appears on page 68 of the English edition of the "Protocols" (4th Edition, published by "The Britons," 62, Oxford-street, London, W.) as "In order to exist, the prestige of power must occupy such a position that the people can say among themselves, ‘If only the King knew about it,’ or ‘When the King knows about it.’"

The last five "protocols" (Nos. 20-24 inclusive) do not contain so many paraphrases of the "Geneva Dialogues" as the first 19. Some of their resemblances and paraphrases are, however, very striking, eg., the following:—

[Start Quote from Protocols on Loans]

"A loan is an issue of Government paper which entails an obligation to pay interest amounting to a percentage of the total sum of the borrowed money. If a loan is at 5 per cent., then in 20 years the Government would have unnecessarily paid out a sum equal to that of the loan in order to cover the percentage. In 40 years it will have paid twice; and in 60 thrice that amount, but the loan will still remain as an unpaid debt."
— "Protocols," p. 77.

[End Quote from Protocols on Loans]

**

[Start Quote from Dialogues on Loans]

MONTESQUIEU.—"How are loans made? By the issue of bonds entailing on the Government the obligation to pay interest proportionate to the capital it has been paid. Thus, if a loan is at 5 per cent., the State, after 20 years, has paid out a sum equal to the borrowed capital. When 40 years have expired it has paid double, after 60 years triple: yet it remains debtor for the entire capital sum."—"Geneva Dialogues," p. 250.

[End Quote from Dialogues on Loans]

But generally speaking "Protocols" 20 and 21, which deal (somewhat unconvincingly) with the financial programme of the Learned Elders, owe less to the "Geneva Dialogues," Nos. 18-21, than to the imagination of the plagiarist author who had for once in a way to show a little originality. This is natural enough since the "Dialogues" in question describe the actual financial policy of the French Imperial Government, while the "Protocols" deal with the future. Again in the last four "Geneva Dialogues" Machiavelli’s apotheosis of the Second Empire, being based upon historical facts which took place between 1852 and 1864, obviously furnished scanty material for the plagiarist who wished to prove or, very possibly, had been ordered to prove in the "Protocols" that the ultimate aim of the leaders of Jewry was to give the world a ruler sprung from the House of David.

The scores of parallels between the two books and a theory concerning the methods of the plagiarist and the reasons for the publication of the "Protocols" in 1905 will be the subject of further articles. Meanwhile it is amusing to find that the only subject with which the "Protocols" deal on lines quite contrary to those followed by Machiavelli in the "Dialogues," is the private life of the Sovereign. The last words of the "Protocols" are "Our Sovereign must be irreproachable." The Elders evidently propose to keep the King of Israel in great order. The historical Machiavelli was, we know, rather a scandalous old gentleman, and his shade insists that amorous adventures, so far from injuring a Sovereign’s reputation, make him an object of interest and sympathy to "the fairest half of his subjects."

(To be continued.)

http://emperors-clothes.com/antisem/graves-tran.htm

Okay...

I think it is great that he will end up facing some kind of justice in the end. Exactly who will provide it and decide what it should be is up in the air at this point.

I also feel that people need to sit back and take the past actions of the different administrations of the US when it comes to foreign policy and interests of National Security being used as a means to promote and fund War by proxy.

Saddam did in fact make use of WDMs when he ordered Gas attacks on the Iranians, Kurds and others. But he did so with WDMs provided to him by the US in that past. I do not mean to say there is any reason for the US to take upon itself any of the responsibility for his using these weapons. But we are responsible for providing them to him in the first place. Which is something we should never allow to happen again.

Saddam is not the only one who should face the courts, everyone under his command in the upper chain of command that took part in these atrocities should face the charges. I hope this is in fact what ends up being the case...

Long winded junk deleted.

Dude, you gotta get out more!

You know what I never understood about anti-semites?
The Bible clearly states that they are God's people. It is written in more than one place that the world will always persecute them.
I can't comprehend how a God-fearing person can side against them, regardless of past mistakes, and still consider themselves Christians. That is where Hilter's regime proved their stupidity. They thought they were doing God a favor or something. I have tried to understand where they were coming from, but I don't it's possible to. No other way to look at the Third Reich. They were the forces of darkness, no one else would do what they did to people. Unless of course you don't believe all that actually happened. Try talking to some WWII vets who saw the death camps and mass graves.

Interesting and intriguing reading though, even if is doesn't seem like the proper place for it. I will definitely paste it in a text file for later reading.
Just try not to get too deep into all that JD Rockefeller crap, true or not, it will drive you nuts.

It even has you questioning the value of capturing this evil bastard.
A fitting end for an egotistical psycopath. Hard for us humans with half a heart not to pity his image a little, he looks so broken (heh!), if you DON'T think about all he has done. The only reason I would even consider questioning his execution, is that it seems like death is too good for him. If they do execute him though, it should be a public one.
Time to assasinate that N Korean freako now, and their ppl enjoy the freedom the South Koreans now enjoy!

God Bless America!

Angel, you are one sick puppy, and i hope you die as confused as you live right now.

Saddam being captured is a good thing, but I fear that for anyone in the States it will raise more questions than answers, given that your (not zionist) government perpetuated his regime for years before deciding he didn't fit any more.

Still, no change there then, given that your foreign policy only ever exists to supplement your domestic political nightmares, rather than be designed to benefit the rest of the world.

Angel's posts are nothing more than generated arguements being posted on a topic that has nothing to do with the topic, itself. Copy And Paste propaganda. I've seen quite of this on the blogs, but why doesn't anyone say anything about it?

Angel = Energizer Bunny of Foolishness

I think it does a disservice to humanity to have to scroll through Angels, or Apples, long winded “Jibba Jabba,” a word eloquently coined by Mr. T.

I pity the fool who talk Jibba Jabba.

Alex Jones Interviews Stanley Hilton

Full transcript March 11 2003

AJ: He has a busy schedule. He’s been in court, all last week and all this week. We had him on about a year ago. He’s Stanley Hilton.
He was brutally attacked by the big government pimps Hannity and Colmes.
He was a senior advisor for Bob Dole, counsel for Bob Dole and others in the Republican Party. He’s an expert on government-sponsored terrorism and has written a book about it, throughout history. And he now has new revelations never before revealed from his depositions of witnesses involved in and around 9/11. He represents over 400 of the victims of 9/11’s families and he has been given almost no attention. While some of the other groups headed by well-known PR bureaucrats, we’ve had them on the show, as well, are trying to suppress this information. Joining us is Stanley Hilton. We are honored to have you on the show Stanley.

SH: Glad to be here.

AJ: Tell us just a little bit about yourself, your lawsuit, recap what we covered last year and in the last year. Tell us what’s developed with the lawsuit and the new revelations that you told me about on the phone.

SH: Well, we filed the lawsuit last May against Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld and several other of the rest of the terrorists that run the U.S. government for complicity in causing and also in aiding and abetting the 9/11 attacks, in order to promote their political agenda. And, we are in the process, you know these lawsuits, they come and they go in terms of level of activity. And most of it is done, you know, in confidential, called discovery, litigation that is depositions under oath, battles in court to get documents. We are facing very strong resistance from the government. They are claiming national security over everything. They claim they don’t want to release documents, etc. But I represent the people who were victimized by what the government did. I’m also challenging the constitutionality of the so-called USA PATRIOT Act, they call it; the anti-patriot act is what I call it. And Patriot Act I and II, with II in the wings, which the government plans to introduce this year, which will be even more severe than Patriot Act I. And this new one, Patriot Act II, they are going to give Bush the right to declare any American citizen a “enemy combatant” arbitrarily. And then take away your citizenship. This will give the government the power to literally strip any American of citizenship if Bush says you’re an enemy combatant, ie: political opponent of the government. So anyway , we saw some very interesting documents and memoranda, including several of those advisors around Bush, namely Wolfowitz, Wormser, Feith, Perle, the rest of them. And they actually wrote these memos several months before 9/11, in which they fervently wished for a “Pearl Harbor type incident” to give them the shock value that would enable them to ramp through their agenda.

AJ: And this you told me last week before this was on ABC News that you have gotten some of this information through depositions and some other little tidbits that haven’t been disclosed. But also, you talked about how you deposed, you got the marriage certificates, the evidence, the photographs - a woman who was married to one of the hijackers. You talked to what you said were six or eight people who were connected to them. And then we have the news articles where the FBI gave them homes, paid their rent, followed them around. We know Israel was involved in similar things. Can you speak to that please?

SH: Yes, I do have a witness who was married, she’s an American woman, but she was married to one of the hijackers and she knew about seven of them. She met seven of them. Essentially these Arab hijackers were double agents. That is, they were operating inside the U.S. for ten to fifteen years in “cells”. Some of them used the term al Qaeda, they’ve used other terms. Al Qaeda is just a word. That means nothing. You could call them the Muslim Brotherhood, the Army of God, they go by all sorts of names. But what they are is a series of cells that have been aided and abetted by the U.S. Government. This woman was involved also, married to him at the time of the 1993 World Trade Center first bombing and the Oklahoma City bombing when her “ex-husband” actually traveled to Oklahoma City several weeks before the bombings. And they were involved, apparently, in that.

But what we have here is double agents. In that they nominally appear to be Arab fanatics. But one of the points that she stressed is they are really not Muslims. They are more interested in Playboy than in the Koran. I mean these people drink. They are very secular. They are not the fanatical Muslim zealots that the Bush criminals would lead us to believe is what’s operating here. What they are is they receive regular payments from the U.S. Government. They have been recruited by the CIA, FBI, counter-intelligence, and so-forth and paid money and allowed to exchange information with U.S. government agents about various activities going on and....

AJ: Let me stop you right there Mr. Hilton. Everything you said was already backed up by mainstream reports. You’ve gotten it now, in sworn testimony in depositions under oath. But something that everybody wants to ignore is that three of the hijackers, at least, were trained at Pensacola Naval Air Station not at a local airfield - on the base, by the government, at least. Now we find out that eight of the hijackers under names we heard are still alive in the Middle East, on television doing interviews. You know, their faces, their names, same people. We have then Mohamed Atta being sent over to the Defense Language School at Monterrey. You talked to Steven Butler.

SH: Yeah.

AJ: The Colonel there, the Dean of the school. So, we know this. And then I have the stories on infowars.com, in prisonplanet.com in the 9/11 archives, which is a great research tool for anybody, where they admit - FBI paid for their houses, FBI lived with them, Mossad lived with them. Now, you’re saying double agents. And you’re saying what we already had the pieces of here without your depositions, but it’s a great confirmation, that they’re involved in World Trade Center I in ’93 and Oklahoma City. But here’s the deal, the FBI cooked the bomb, trained the driver, gave the guys the detonators in the first World Trade Center. We know that. That’s in the New York Times. We know that the feds were inside planting the bombs at Oklahoma City and had these Iraqis outside with McVeigh. I’ve talked to police, the FBI. So when you say double agent, I would venture to say that these are double agents who were still alive who were just seen at the scene of the crime while the globalists militarily carry out the attacks themselves. That’s where the evidence points. But what you’ve proven and what the news has proven is they at least received payments and training and protection and the FBI has been told not to stop these al Qaeda groups. Go ahead.

SH: Yeah, the witness I was talking about, personally met Atta - two Attas - Mohamed and the younger brother. And they are alleged to be two of the ones on the airliners. You know, the thing is, these individuals are, in my view, “patsies”. That is, they were paid by the government. I don’t believe that they themselves flew the planes into, as I said previously, allegations are that the government has this device that we codename Cyclops that allows, from an airbase nearby, to disable the pilot’s control of an airliners and to fly them by remote control.

AJ: That’s admitted. It’s decades old. It’s called Global Hawk.

SH: Yeah, Global Hawk, right. Of course, the government denied that it’s “deployed”. They say they’ve got the technology but they haven’t deployed it.

AJ: Let me stop you. Let me stop you. This is really key, Sir. We are so honored to have you. I’ve really studied this and I want to give you.. You probably already have and I want to reiterate it for the listeners. Bush, two days after the attack at a speech in New York said that in the future we can remote control these planes and land them so this doesn’t happen. And someone reached up and physically grabbed him by the arm and made him shut-up. And, if you’ve seen “The Masters of Terror,” we have the two Associated Press articles, after you were on our show and brought this up that you have this from inside military officers.....

SH: Yes.

AJ: Suddenly, they had a cover story and two AP articles in the New York Daily News, all in the film, where they said, “Lo and behold, 8:30 in the morning, the CIA was running a drill of flying jetliners into buildings in New York and D.C.” It just so happened at that very minute they were running this and it just so happened that NORAD stood down for an hour and half, the 58 minutes in different cases. I mean it’s incredible when you add all this together. Go ahead.

SH: Yeah, that’s right. The official government party line is, the first line of defense is the cause and effect of science fiction doesn’t exist. But that’s a total lie. Anybody that works - and I’ve spoken to hundreds of mechanics and maintenance managers at United Airlines and American Airlines and several others and they all confirm that technology exists.

AJ: Well, how do drones operate? The company is in Fort Worth.

SH: Sure, sure, the question is has it been deployed. The answer is: yes, it has. I have one witness who was on the very same United aircraft from Newark, New Jersey to San Francisco, four days before September 11th, and observed certain individuals on that plane who were then later claimed to be the hijackers. He observed them speaking with the government agents.

AJ: Is that Mr. Woods?

SH: I can’t disclose names on that right now.

AJ: And then, he was threatened. I don’t know if it is Woods but Woods said, he....

SH: No, it’s not Woods. It’s someone else. It’s someone else. This is a civilian.

AJ: But with Woods, the famous actor, (garbled) and this is a problem, the FBI came and said you tell anybody about this and you are going to jail.

SH: Well yes, that’s right. The anti-Patriot Act I and II, as I call them, are the tools which are very similar to what happened in Nazi Germany, Hitler’s enabling act after the Reichstag fire. It gave him dictatorial power. That’s the goal here. That’s the end run. This is what we have to look at here - what their purpose ultimately is. I mean this attempt to invade Iraq now, for no purpose, is coming I guess next week or the week after, is just starting. This was planned long before 9/11. These people around Wolfowitz and so forth. I mean I went to school with Wolfowitz. I was at the same university in the late ‘60s when he was very active with the Israelis over there at the University of Chicago. He was pursuing a PhD and these people have an agenda. It’s not an agenda that helps the America people; it’s an attempt to use this country and its power, to wreck this country, in the service of another nefarious and ulterior goal.

AJ: Now, Mr. Hilton, there is a lot to cover. Can we just go through your depositions and this is incredibly dangerous. You have incredible, amazing honor and will, and I mean this Sir. God bless you. People like you are going to save this country. Your witnesses do...You know what you are doing is very, very dangerous. I’m going to be honest with you, I hope you have large life insurance policies.

SH: (Laughs)

AJ: I need them too, but no, what you are really doing pierces the veil and you are on target. But there is so many of us now, it’s why they are on the run and we are on the march. Go down some of the key stuff you’ve got in depositions. I don’t want to give your whole case away..

SH: Well, as I mentioned, the individual on the aircraft that was later hijacked, four days later - same flight, same destination - Newark to San Francisco - what he observed, what others on that plane, including United flight attendants observed, were these individuals who four days later were said to be on the plane that crashed it. And they’re government controlled - and there is this term “trade craft,” meaning basically spying, counter spying. And one of the terms in trade craft is control. These Arabs that were alleged to have done it had controls and some of our discovery has identified some of these people. They are FBI and CIA agents who...

AJ: So they had control - actual agents or case officers and they had their little minion drones with them.

SH: Yeah, these people operated in cells. The cells are from six to twelve individuals. And the cells move around, for instance, from Portland, Oregon to San Diego. It’s just one example. But they didn’t move all six to twelve of them by chance. They were instructed to do it. They were at locations or schools or apartments, etc., that were bought here. Again, this is from a direct eyewitness. This has been verified with marriage certificates, documents, photographs - photographs with bin Laden and his brothers.

AJ: Paid for by the U.S. Government. That’s official.

SH: Yeah.

AJ: Associated Press, Washington Post and they just kind of brush that over.

SH: See the thing is that you look back in ’93 and ’95, Oklahoma City, World Trade Center, and you say well Clinton was in power; whereas now it’s Bush. So you say well how could it be the same players here? The answer is that the shadow government transcends individual political puppets that occupy 1600 Pennsylvania. I mean it doesn’t really make much difference whether it’s Clinton or Bush. The shadow government, as I call it, essentially is continuous. These bureaucrats that you’ve got there at the Pentagon, State Dept., White House, etc., they stay on. They stay on from administration to administration pursuing a certain agenda. And I think this is all part of a pattern. And the latest example, manifestation was 9/11. You’ve got that and the anthrax attack which happened immediately right after 9/11.

AJ: Well that turns out - the most weaponized form of anthrax ever seen, U.S. Government patented design. It is incredibly small microns, levels, coated in bentonite, sent and then Bush is on Cipro, the anthrax antibiotic on September 10th, with his cabinet. Judicial Watch tries to serve a summons to depose the press secretary who admitted this and they tell them at the front gate, you’ll be arrested if you depose us. Did you hear about that?

SH: Yes, I did.

AJ: Stay there. I mean Clinton didn’t even do that. Stanley Hilton, an amazing man, we'll be right back.

BREAK

AJ: And we will take your calls for Mr. Hilton in the next hour. Again, this guy knows what he’s talking about. He has worked with some of the highest levels in the U.S. government, in the U.S. Senate. He was counsel to Bob Dole. He is a good American. He knows tyranny when he sees it; same thing with me. Again, I’ve been a Republican for years but I’m not this type of a Republican. I love America and the Bill of Rights. These neocons are the worst of Stalin and Hitler, rolled into one. And I’m not using those terms for effect. These are scary people. Mr. Hilton, from your experience, what types of groups of people, the shadow government, which they just announced, remember last year, that we’ve known about for years. And what does the shadow government want this world to be like?

SH: Basically a one-world globalist tyranny controlled by them, of course, the neocons, neo-conservatives. But they are not really conservatives; they are radicals because they are seeking a radical destruction of our way of life for the last two-hundred years. They’re are basically introducing an alien anti-American form of tyranny which has more to do with old Europe and Asia than it has to do with this country. The ultimate goal, of course, is to advance their own agenda. Certainly, the extension of Israel’s borders from the Nile to the Euphrates as they say the Bible mandates is certainly a major goal. No question about it. Emulation of Sharon’s government in Israel to turn the U.S. into sort of a super Israel, I think is another purpose. And if you look at what’s going on now with the propaganda war - all this 9/11 exaggerations and lies and so forth by these criminals around Bush. That is certainly aimed at the agenda of territorial expansion of Israel in the Middle East - the major goal, there is no question about it.

AJ: You know that’s a key motive that I haven’t talked enough about. We do have the trillions of dollars of oil, the weapons sales, the $1.7 to 1.9 trillion cost of a 5-year occupation paid into the Carlyle Group and others. The domestic police state crackdown, the smokescreen for economic collapse while they consolidate, while they suck Enron and other companies dry. They can declare national security on investigations of that. But I would agree with you about Israel because what makes me lean more toward what you’re saying is that it’s being one of the central crown jewels or the star of the crown, one of the big ones, the head piece, is that the announcement three months ago by Reuters, by Israel, that the government is going to let us kill American citizens in America. No judge, no jury, no nothing, they’re just going to kill us. And now at Janes’ weapons, this is mainstream, you know the big world weapons tracker, came out about Israel and others, so did the Times of London, with race specific viruses and bacteria to kill other races other than themselves. That is the ultimate of Hitlerian-type activities.

SH: Well, the term that has been used is Zionazis, I think it’s an apt term - Zionazis. And I think it’s ironic because the Nazis based their theory on the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” which are alleged to have been shaped by Czar claiming the Jews wanted world conflict. Now we’ve got the complete reverse, where the current Zionazis of Israel and their friends here in the Bush administration and elsewhere are emulating Hitler. It’s come full circle. Essentially it is the same thing, whether you call them Jews or non-Jews. The point is it’s the same ideology - tyranny....

AJ: Yeah, it could be Chinese, you know you said the Asian model. It’s just old fashion, Egyptian, Babylonian, ancient tyranny.

SH: Yeah, Hitler used the word Jew. Today the word we are using terrorist. This term terrorist can apply to anybody. As I said, they are attempting to legalize it just as Hitler had the 1935 Nuremberg laws that outlawed the Jews. Well, now they are trying to come out with an anti-patriot laws to outlaw any kind of dissent and to call you a terrorist if you attack Bush or these criminals around him - these alien criminals. And I think the agenda is clear - it is to turn the American people into Palestinian slaves. I mean that’s the way it seems to me - just as the Israelis are treating the Palestinians there as sub-humans....

AJ: And then to legitimize that, they founded Hamas, which is now admitted. We’ll be right back, stay with us.

BREAK

AJ: Whether it’s Adolf Hitler or Saddam Hussein, the globalists, the New World Order is funded and trained them to bring you the crises, so they can offer their solution: world government. We are talking to Stanley Hilton. He is the lawyer for over 400 of the victims’ families of 9/11. He is suing the government, not just for prior knowledge, but for complicity. He now, on recap, has the evidence from depositions, government agents, you name it, wives of supposed hijackers, that they were paid, funded, housed, protected by the U.S. government. That’s all come out in mainstream news - but a piece here and a piece there: “Oh, the FBI, in a strange twist, owned the houses that the hijackers lived in and paid them. In another twist, there were trained at a secret military program at Pensacola.” On and on and on. The LA Times, before the attacks, Bush gives $134 million to the Taliban. They’re in business together, the bin Ladens are in satellites and oil and they just bought, through the Carlyle Group, Universal Studios. And they are buying up radio networks and TV. We’ve got all this happening and when you add it all together.... Mr. Hilton, have you heard them talk about how torture is good? And as if that’s not enough of terrorist suspects, now they want to torture terrorist suspects’ children but the Patriot Act, in Section 802, says that any action that endangers human life and is a violation of any federal or state law. As a lawyer, as Bob Doles’ former chief counsel, what does that mean when the definition is any action that endangers human life, that’s a violation of federal or state law? This isn’t just going to be the Arabs that get tortured, is it?

SH: No, itÂ’s just a blank check for the government to completely destroy democracy and torture any dissenter. You know, Alan Dershowitz, the so-called professor of law at Harvard, which is my alma mater, at Harvard University Law School. HeÂ’s the one who is coming out with calling for torture. I believe he testified before a Senate Committee a few weeks ago...

AJ: Stick needles under their fingers..

SH: Yeah. Well, you know, him and his book of chutzpah and elsewhere, there is another Israeli firster, dual loyalist. But, I donÂ’t know if I should use the term dual loyalist; I think rather Israeli loyalist. I mean these are the people behind this. They use this....

AJ: Well, it is bazaar, it was Abrams, on the Abrams Report, on MSNBC, said “let’s torture people’s children.” I’m sorry, torturing children is wrong. We are seeing this unified Nazi-like, weird race thing.

SH: Yeah. Well, I hope this will backfire on them because this is outrageous. ItÂ’s an attempt to, thereÂ’s a word in Hebrew called Goyim, which means non-Jews, it means cattle. I think that summarizes it all. You know, you torture the cattle. What difference does it make? TheyÂ’re not the master race so you canÂ’t have first class citizenship in Israel unless you are born from a Jewish mother. Now if thatÂ’s not racism, you tell me what it is. These are the people we are dying for. I mean thatÂ’s the law of Israel. You can be born in Milwaukee and as long as your mother is Jewish, you can become an Israeli citizen. But if you are born in Jerusalem and you donÂ’t have a Jewish mother, you canÂ’t. But you tell me if thatÂ’s not racist.

AJ: Israel has got a big problem because the left-wing has woken up to the incredible racism we are dealing with here. And whether itÂ’s Hitler or Jiang Zemin or Israel involved in all this, itÂ’s wrong. Now, and when they say they are going to come in here and kill American citizens with no trial, if it was Russians doing that, would we put up with it?

SH: Well, Russia is our friend now. Bush is cozying up to Putin now. I guess Chechnya, genocide Chechnya is okay because there are terrorists there. Why are these people suddenly our friends? I thought the whole cold war for 50 years....

AJ: And by the way, Putin got his war, he was caught blowing up apartment buildings. ThatÂ’s mainstream news, blaming it on the Chechens.

SH: --and theatres. Putin is just another version of the Russian Czars and the commissars, and so on. These are people who are being presented as friends and Bush is saying he is looking into this fellowÂ’s eyes and seeing a great man. Putin is an ex-KGB person, what do you expect from him? These people are being presented as models for this government; these are the individuals calling for torture who are supposed to be leading this country.

AJ: Totally sick. WeÂ’ll come back and take calls and recap some of the top news.

BREAK

AJ: We are talking to Stanley Hilton, chief counsel to Bob Dole, one of the architects of the Strategic Petroleum Initiative, to get that set up. And, of course, he is a Harvard graduate, he represents 400 of the victims’ families, according to press reports - over 400 of the victims’ families of 9/11. And he isn’t charging prior knowledge. He has the evidence, he’s done the depositions on the facts, ladies and gentleman. Confirmed by news articles that already came out, he just wanted to document it for himself, that the FBI and CIA handles and controls radical Islam. Yitzhak Rabin, right before he was assassinated by Mossad, was a good man for telling the truth, said, “I apologize.” He said it at Tel Aviv University, the Jerusalem Post reported, for the fact that Israel founded Hamas to destabilize the region so there could never be a true peace. So, whether it’s Bush or the Communist Chinese or the radical Israelis, these globalists need crises, they want war, they want slavery, they want this to happen and it’s happening - whether you’re Bush or Ariel Sharon, they are all together in this New World Order. And when they start talking about torturing terrorist suspects, children, and assassinating Americans, that’s when I come out and say no.

I know weÂ’ve got Andy and Jackie and Gordon and Dan, theyÂ’ve all been holding wanting to talk to you. Any other key depositions youÂ’ve done, not just with military officers or witnesses of the feds protecting the hijackers on planes and training them or people inside the airlines with the Global Hawk on these aircraft, all of this, break it down. Any other key smoking gun pieces of evidence and whereÂ’s your lawsuit going. I read in the press, the government is declaring national security on that and on the fire fighter tapes, that recorded bombs going off. They first said all the tapes malfunctioned. It turns out they were all there, grabbed by Bush. Could you break all this down for us. Any other key areas?

SH: You know there is a lot of this that I canÂ’t really talk about on the air for obvious reasons. But I think the evidence is building as we are going to eventually get it out to the light of day in public trial - which we hope to bring next year, here in the federal court. Also, itÂ’s part of larger agenda, but whatÂ’s really going is we hope to examine the constitutionality of this anti-patriot act because itÂ’s clearly unconstitutional. The Eighth Amendment says you canÂ’t use cruel or unusual punishment. But Dershowitz and his pals, and his friends around Bush, of course, donÂ’t think that means a damn thing. And they want to bring about a lawless society under the guise of laws. And itÂ’s really largely political but I think the evidence will show that these criminals are not only going to be removed from power but brought to justice for their crimes, including mass murder and attempting to destroy this countryÂ’s democracy.

AJ: Well, I would say our constitutional republic. Mr. Hilton, I would add to that that across the board here, you read Patriot Act II. And IÂ’ve written an analysis of it, on infowars.com. I mean it says they can grab you for any reason not even knowing if you aided a terrorist. Grab you - not ever telling when they grabbed you - you are a missing person. And then itÂ’s got a subsection on secret executions.

SH: Yeah, this sounds like something out of a bad science fiction novel. But, throughout history, totalitarian regimes abuse terror as they instrument a state policy and thatÂ’s what we have today. ItÂ’s just a continuation of history. I mean the czars in Russian used it, the Nazis used it, the communists used it. ItÂ’s nothing new. This is just a new guise. They are bringing about selective terror. I would suspect that they will try something again, maybe not quite as spectacular as 9/11 but certainly something of that nature to try again to galvanize, whatÂ’s called GSR, galvanic skin response, to get the people scared to death so they will give up more and more of their rights. But itÂ’s all an illusion. What we need to do is get rid of these criminals, bring them to justice, have them arrested under a real tribunal and put them on trial for their crimes against not only the people, but their crimes against humanity.

AJ: Well, itÂ’s amazing. You know the world is getting wise to this. The majority of people in Europe and IÂ’ve read the polls, are saying the globalists carried 9/11 out.

SH: Oh yeah.

AJ: So whereÂ’s your suit going? I mean how are they trying to block it using national security?

SH: By refusing to give us documents that we have subpoenaed, documents that we have demanded by the regular court processes, by claiming that there is a national security override. They have also attempted to bribe several of the plaintiffs. One of the fellows I used to work with in the U.S. Senate, named Ken Feinberg, heÂ’s in charge of handing out what I call sugar-coated bribes. That is monetary awards to any of the victims of 9/11 and their families who will drop their suits or waive their right to sue. And, in fact, some of them have brought suit against Ken. I know the guy personally because I used to work with him on the Senate Judiciary Committee. And thatÂ’s one of the things they try to do. But as far as my suit is concerned, they are trying to raise this blanket of national security and so a lot of it is involved in the litigation process and so forth. They can claim to hide everything, to hide what they are doing. ThatÂ’s just a word. It means nothing - national security - what does that mean? Especially when we are accusing these very individuals of sabotaging the national security of this country to pursue their own political objective.

AJ: Well, the new Patriot Act gets rid of almost all civil rights suits and court orders and gives them total immunity. Just like Bush, in Homeland Security, gave vaccine makers immunity for autism class action suits. YouÂ’re right, itÂ’s criminals giving themselves immunity.

SH: That’s right. Well, of course, you know in Nazi Germany you can’t sue Hitler. Did anybody try to sue Hitler? No, he got immunity, too. And the same is true of the communists or czarist Russia, Mao Tse-tung in China, what have you, you cannot enforce your rights unless you can bring these criminals to justice in a court of law. And they are trying to take away that right - not only in that way but in many other ways. They are trying to attack so-called “trial lawyers” - totally take away people’s rights, to con them into believing that if you just blindly follow Bush, make Bush a god, and it is really very frightening.

AJ: What did you think - because I had Judicial Watch on - Judicial Watch is suing Bush for the workers there at the post office who wouldnÂ’t get treatment even after the anthrax attacks were going. It turns out Bush and his cabinet were on Cipro. Judical Watch twice tried to serve papers to the White House press secretary who admitted in the press conference October 10th, 2001, that they were all on Cipro. And they tried to deliver this subpoena for the deposition and they said weÂ’ll arrest you. This was in the news, under the Patriot Act, if you drop that subpoena. Now Clinton would accept subpoenas. Now they are threatening to arrest people for terrorism if they give somebody a subpoena.

SH: Well, itÂ’s absurd but itÂ’s like the situation in the Albany, New York mall where they arrested a guy for wearing a peace t-shirt. We are clearly losing civil liberties here. ItÂ’s just really awful. The way you do that, you undermine like a termite, you undermine and destroy the foundation of peopleÂ’s freedom. I have a client here in San Francisco who was fired by Neiman Marcus a couple of weeks ago because he was distributing some of your literature, Alex, like your videotapes and some of those deception dollars - that has BushÂ’s face as basically a war criminal and as a big brother. And these people arrested him, they put him in handcuffs, they beat him up, they escorted him out of there and they fired him. And they said the country is in war.

AJ: By the way, he is a listener of this show, Abel Ash (?). When the security guy walked him in - he was doing this during his lunch break which everybody was doing. And everybody was giving stuff out during lunch break. And they said to him, you are not allowed to do this. You are not allowed to speak out. We are at war, you canÂ’t do that. And then they fired him. So it shows the mindset, the insane mindset.

SH: Yeah, well itÂ’s pretty much like the analogy of termites. The criminals, what they are doing is they are sending out the termites to undermine the foundation of the country. Just as with termites, you can think there is a brilliant house there that is a house ready to collapse because of the rot inside. ThatÂ’s whatÂ’s happening here in this country - itÂ’s rotting away and these termites are conning average citizens and security guards, mall guards to go out against people and they are saying put an American flag, bumper sticker, on and that makes you a patriot. Meanwhile you are destroying the very principles the flag is supposed to represent.

AJ: There you go. The listeners are very patient. Can we take some calls?

SH: Sure.

AJ: Andy in Ohio, and then Jackie, Gordan, Dan and Kevin. Go ahead Andy.

Andy: Hey Alex, itÂ’s good to talk to you.

AJ: You bet. You are on the air with our guest.

Andy: IÂ’m really pleased to talk to you, Mr. Hilton.

SH: Thank you.

Andy: And I wanted to ask you, do you think that the, on September 11th, were there hijackers on those planes or not?

SH: You know, thatÂ’s hard to say since weÂ’ve never seen, from the legal point of view, the bodies. There have never been autopsies. They have never identified bodies.

AJ: There was a passport found in the ruble, uncharred. ItÂ’s turns out eight of the nineteen are still alive. ItÂ’s clear they are patsies, as he said, just seen on camera. We know that. What he is focusing on is: who paid their rent? The FBI. Who protected them? Who told FBI not to stop them? The FBI, the CIA, W199I, Bush. Is that what you are saying Mr. Hilton? You could prove they worked for the U.S. government.

SH: Oh yes, they were on the government payroll. There is no question, as I said earlier, double agents. In some cases, triple agents. But, the point is that what we have here is a situation where, in my opinion, some of those alleged nineteen were on the plane, some were not. The person who used to be married to my witness, for example, we have some evidence to believe that he is still alive, that he has contacted her. And so how could he be dead in a crash when he is contacting her now? I mean, this is the kind of stuff we are dealing with now. These are individuals who were groomed by the U.S. government and they were protected.

AJ: And you said you have depositions that they were involved in Oklahoma City and World Trade I.

SH: Yeah, that they took trips out there shortly before the April 19th, 1995 bombing, etc., etc. Even the date there, HitlerÂ’s birthday being April 20th, you know that was all, of course, it canÂ’t be anti-Semitism because Hitler is the anti-Semite. So that....

AJ: So they are trying to blame it on the right-wing using Islamic proxies. Now we see the story being circulated that the real right-wing that is fighting the New World Order is connected to Saddam. And why would Clinton, after these guys were arrested by good FBI, order their release and why wouldnÂ’t the feds release the surveillance camera footage of them bombing the building? Correct, Stanley?

SH: Oh yes, yes.

(under fade-out music)
AJ: So surely, government operatives being protected and later being linked up with the American people to sic homeland security on, letÂ’s face it, white people, to get you trained to accept it, to get the Arabs, now itÂ’s for everybody.

BREAK

angel...
you hate the guy fine, your ryrs can see only one side of the story, here we go I go to the pob, the bar man gave me free drink, he keeps gaving me all the times and I keep going to visit him, fundementally I like this this guy because he gave me something and he likes me, so if the whole world comes and says he is an asswhole, I am the first to say NO.... for no reason is just because the guy( the barman) was so nice to me....
back to our story what exactly does mr SADDAM TO YOU ,, personally?
who in this world does respect his own people fully? does mr bush listen to the anti war demo, does mr blair consern about the voice of brits who appose the involvement in iraq?

does mr sharon listen to the wise israelis who want to do fully peace with the arabs ?

I doubt.....

we learn from history, that no way you will be happy with barman unless he keeps giving you...


by the way one day we will know all about this captured movie, which was badly directed

Yes, nice to see Saddam captured. Definitely a bad dude.

Hopefully, he'll give up these "weapons of mass destruction".

Would have been nice if Bush had been more truthful at the outset and said, "Hey, we don't know if he's got them, but we're tired of getting yanked around."

Now, of course, Bush's credibility is suspect in the rest of the world, and even the reigning superpower could use a few friends (and not of the co-opted, black-mailed, variety "either your for us, or your against us) to help with some long-term projects seriously needing attention.

Anyway, maybe Bush will realize that even while the UN structure needs modernization and reform, it can still help in the world. Then maybe Bush will direct the government to pay up their back-owed dues.

None of which diminishes the good result of getting Saddam out of power, and of actually capturing him.

You are absolutely right on all accounts. I have even heard people say that Saddam looks so sad and remorseful because of his appearance after they dug him out of his little hole. Once again goes to show that the media and other liberals tend to react with their emotions rather than using rational thought and logic to decipher a situation.

That piece on the Protocols was absolutely eye-opening! Wow!