That would be so nice.  That would solve a large amount of our problems because seniority wouldn't mean much.  Limit it to 2 or 3 terms and I think we'd be in much better shape.  I also think it would be nice if actively sitting officials couldn't campaign for another office.  So we wouldn't have current members of congress campaigning for President when they are supposed to be on Capital Hill doing their jobs.

I was going to say reset button...I was close.

~Zoo

110% Agreed

Not sure I can agree with that. You see, when I reset my computer when ever Windows wants to act stupid on me, all it does is clear out whats messing it up at the moment but the problem didn't actually get resolved and will eventually come back to haunt me. The Govt is an even scarier reality if we could simply hit the reset button.

Here's the trick. The Congressmen and Senators (if they are included as well) would not have enough time to form special connections with certain companies or lobbyist so the concept of things being done, not for the people but for special interest kinda shrinks. It allows others who might actually wanna do a good job get a chance at doing something for their country.

Look at it this way, ever 4 or 8 years we get a new leader or a second term leader that can be replaced if he screws up unlike other countries where leaders reign supreme. That's kinda how a Congressman seems, even though some get voted out from time to time, some end up there long enough to for special connections that are not always for the benefit of the people.

Opportunity will always be there, but it would be much easier to spot. lobbyists would also be less inclined to "invest" in someone that would be gone in such a short time. Not all flies are captured in the flytrap, but everyone caught is a small victory.

A good example of being there too long is Feinstein helping out her husbands stock portfolio. Apparently this is not the first time. She has been there long enough to game the system. Her colleges seem unwilling to take matters under control. Term limits would remove their lack of judgment in similar matters. Plenty of examples on both sides.

Persons will really leadership abilities would need to be nominated for the positions, as "on the job training" time would be minimal. I'd also eliminate the pension they get. This is a job that should be done for country, not as a potential personal windfall for years to come. I'm sure many future job opportunities would present themselves to the person completing their terms.

Well it's all speculation anyway. Hungry dogs are not going to willingly restrict their own time at the gravy bowl. Anyone that brings up such legislation will surely be reprimanded by all (including his/her own). Something like this would have to be a massive grassroots and even then might not get any traction.

I will make the traction you all keep the moter, running

I will make the traction you all keep the motor, running

Mhmm, and unfortunately...I don't see that happening. (Blegh, I wish someone would prove me wrong on that, seriously.)

let's see there is already term limits for congress it is or called DO NOT VOTE THE GUY OR GAL BACK INTO OFFICE 

oh i forgot you all can not figure that out   and let me tell you congress believes that also so you keep voting them in and voting them in and voting them in 

MY GOSH HOW DUMB CAN YOU ALL BE  and you say i am amusing well if you do not like what congress is doing and you still vote them in NOW THAT IS COMICIAL

well now if you are a free thinker and is looking for answers then go to youtube.com and checkout jdcriveau  NOW THERE IS SOMETHING DIFFERENT  at leaast jd sees the problem and can fix it

jd

Why? If someone is great at their job, why force them to stop doing it even when everyone they represent wants them to do it? If people get worse the longer they're doing their job, then since they're elected, the voters can simply vote for someone else. There's no need for some arbitrary limit when the voters get to choose.

Ironically the more you spam in every thread for me to do that, the less likely I (and everyone else) are to actually bother 'checking out jdcrivea'. Especially when in most of your posts you're simply copying and pasting the exact same thing.

I agree with this, up to a point.  While we get what we deserve, for the most part, the incumbents have, in a variety of ways, definitely stacked the deck in their favor as the years have gone by, making it much more difficult to unseat a sitting member.  Not impossible, by any means (see Daschle, Tom), but more difficult.

It comes down to a philosophical point for me.  I believe 'we the people' should be much more active in governance.  We've become politically lazy in many respects, and left the field to a professional class of politicians who inevitably become progressively more concerned with their profession than with us.  Some form of term limits would minimize this drift toward elitist governors (generic term), though I readily admit it would be the lazy man's fix.

And in taking forever my post is simply a mirror to Daiwa, haha.