bleedingheartliberal bleedingheartliberal

Stolen Hopes

Stolen Hopes

Kerry was screwed, but the battle rages on

It was a surreal moment, after John Edwards announced in the early morning of November 3rd, that the fight for every vote would continue, word spread through my high school that Senator Kerry had conceded. I was devastated and in denial. What caused the sudden reversal of positions by the campaign in a mere 9 hour time frame? After a whole campaign of saying every vote would be counted, why was Senator Kerry conceding? He said that if all the votes were counted he would've still lost, and that there was "no chance" we could win the election. He lied. Greg Palast (Ya'll need to read this if you haven't Palast's article is is at http://www.gregpalast.com) has reported that there are 247,672 ballots still uncounted. Does that sound familiar? It should because that is what Mary Beth Cahill's statement about the estimated "250,000 uncounted votes" on November 3, 2004 said. That number, though immediately dismissed by pundits and conservative talking heads, however includes "discarded" ballots, like the "chad" ballots that could be reviewed through legal action. . So why not fight? He says he wants the country to "heal". I say there's more to his concession than that.


As many of you know, insiders from the campaign say that Senator Edwards insisted adamantly on continuing the legal battle. From the tone of his early morning speech, that's what it seemed like. There are two possible scenarios here. Scenario one: Senator Kerry out of the goodness of his heart, and based on an extreme desire to begin to heal this wounded and divided nation conceded, so the country could move on. Scenario two: Something extreme, so outrageous factor influenced Senator Kerry to immediately concede, despite the advice of John Edwards. I go with scenario two.

55 percent of roughly 250,000 votes is definitely worth fighting for. I believe, and will always believe, that Senator Kerry was threatened and forced into concession.

There is still hope however, the DailyKos broke that there's an Ohio election law that allows 5 voters in a county to demand a recount of the votes. It has been researched and verified that there is such a law. So if we can get 5 voters out in every county we can do what Senator Kerry can't/doesn't want to do, and try to fight for justice in Ohio. If you know anyone there, then please let them know to demand a recount. There is a 5 day limit on this, so we must act fast.

THE BATTLE RAGES ON
12,829 views 30 replies
Reply #26 Top
Your math just doesn't hold up. You must be one of those "children left behind."

If you counted every one of those 247k ballots you want counted and Kerry got 55% of them, Bush would have gotten 45% of them, meaning his margin of victory would have been reduced by about 25k (10% of the outstanding ballots), under you best-case scenario.

What would be the point?

Cheers,
Daiwa
Reply #27 Top
My apologies for the mathematical errors. The point, suing for the "miscounted" ballots is fundamentally right. They promised to make sure "every" vote was counted, so they should carry out their promise.
Reply #28 Top
What's really sad here is that people think it's OK that thousands of ballots go uncounted. Tossed out. Ignored. Disregarded.

WHAT THE F*UCK IS OK WITH THAT??!!

It's not OK. It's horrendous. I have accepted Kerry's defeat, because that was his choice. Fact is, he really had no choice. Doesn't matter. What does matter is that so many dunderheads with their heads up their asses think it's OK that votes are not counted.

Think about this. Maybe, the only votes we're talking about here is Ohio. But, what about every other state in this country? They ALL have uncounted votes. I do not think this is OK. This is definitely NOT OK.

This election was so close in so many states, for the votes to not be counted, then bush states he's got a mandate, is nothing but arrogance. Lowlife, despicable arrogance. There was no mandate. Only a bunch of votes that were never counted. I sure wish there would be some organization who would look into what exactly wasn't counted, and where did those no-counts come from. I suspect they would be predominantly democratic districts. But, we'll never know. And, that's what's so criminal about this. Smacks very loudly of fascism to me. The line iinto fascism is too fine to simply ignore. It's so sad.
Reply #29 Top
Bleedingheartliberal, I agree with you wholeheartedly. But, that blue text is tough. Someone already mentioned it. Thanks.
Reply #30 Top

Reply #26 By: Daiwa - 11/6/2004 12:46:25 AM
Your math just doesn't hold up. You must be one of those "children left behind."

If you counted every one of those 247k ballots you want counted and Kerry got 55% of them, Bush would have gotten 45% of them, meaning his margin of victory would have been reduced by about 25k (10% of the outstanding ballots), under you best-case scenario.


My math holds up just fine! There are NOT 247K ballots to be counted there were only 155K! Link
Now figure what the FEC says that "usually" only 10% of those ballots will be valid. Now lets see you math again, and try using the right figures this time..
I just realized that you probably weren't talking about me. If that is the case let me apologize right now.