This is a sad story indeed. But playing connect the dots to make a tragedy into a political point is in very poor taste. If you're gonna do that, make sure there's a direct link, like in the case of Jim D Adkisson, who walked into a church in tennessee and started shooting people, a church that he targeted because of it's liberal stance (there's no connecting the dots here, Adkisson left a letter in his car stating his hatred of the liberal movement and the church that helped found a chapter of the ACLU)

Now, since Adkisson, a conservative, decided he hated liberal folks enough that he was going to walk into a church and shoot some people dead, does that somehow magically indicate that all conservatives are going to start walking into churches and shoot people dead?

Not at all. What it does mean, is that Adkisson was a nutjob, and has no bearing on the conservative movement.

So too does this event in DC have no bearing on Obama's government, anymore so than it would if it occurred in Texas (and don't tell me no homeless person's ever been left to die while passerbys went about their way in Texas)

A "fact" of insane Obama worship is a "hard fact"? Aside from the amazing statement that a fact is a fact, would you care to offer anything to substantiate that (note: I'm looking for a bit more than 'oh, I found one person in the whole world who seems to conduct insane Obama worship')?

Also your strange leaps of logic that somehow seems to say 'if people were happier, then there would be no murders like this at all, so if there are murders then this stimulating effect is a myth' is ludicrous. Here's a quick example of one leap contained within there: Lets say 1k murders are committed in a year within a jurisdiction. A new government comes into power, and cuts it to 10 murders a year, and hails how they've had a great impact on reducing murders. Someone like you siezes on one of the 10 murders, and says how it shows their murder reduction is a myth, and to just ask the deceased victim (the reason why that's just one of the leaps is because in that example, the murdered person was relevant to the claim of reducing murders).

Also re: no-one helping him, from the article it says he was unconcious, so it's quite possible that some people thought he was sleeping (those that weren't there at the time of the attack). A sad event, made even sadder with the death then being used to support some twisted anti-Obama rhetoric.

"...and this is how we say good bye in Germany" -Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.

Seems that is starting to apply in the US as well.

 Yeah, okay...that was cute.

I wouldn't call it a 'good' reason.  Passing out isn't exactly healthy- diabetic shock, heart attack, aneurysm...and a whole host of other things can make you land on the ground without external signs of a severe medical issue.

~Zoo