The Fate of SCOTUS Judges

Geeze this article must be boring as hell 30 views and not one comment.

You have simply pointed out the brilliance of Our Constitution. 

I don't like the course that we are currently on.

Just wait till Obama really starts to turn this country into France. Then we shall see what the country has to say about the road we are traveling.

Yes, and as I have heard stated, I hope Obama fails in his stated goals.

What I see is a population buying into an ideology of utopia that supposedly lives under socialism.  I'd love to hear of a country that has had socialism for a duration of 15+ years that has ever actually come close to this utopia?  Instead all I see are countries that favors one group over another and the unfavored groups are oppressed and silenced.  In the majority of these cases the Jewish population has not fared well. 

This shows how far things have degenerated. So never mind the person's qualification to interpret the US Constitution,  it's going to be about their social engineering ideology...and you know what...I think stupid Republicans so anxious to get along will go along!  In my view, this is why we are so ununited.

Ha, this is exactly what my husband says!  

I don't remember the source, but I read that liberty is freedom without truth.

he has stated goals? when did thisd happen and where was I?

I hate to tell ya kid but the Jewish population NEVER FARES WELL!!! eXCEPT UNDER A REPUBLIC, which is what we now have.

Hopefully the right will have the balls to Block any flaming queen that Obama wants to put on the SCOTUS after all there should be some decorum there.

That's my understanding but yet the Jewish population favors socialism.

I can't answer the last part of your question, however, in the last couple of years, we heard a lot of campaign promises....

Wonder what he's going to do with his executive order pen?

Back in August when he was addressing Planned Parenthood, he promised to make America the most pro-abortion nation on earth by passing the "Freedom of Choice Act" FOCA which would essentially nullify all current state restrictions on abortion. And so far, it's looking that way....to date every one of this appoointees are pro-abortion.

Our armed forces are going to get a new look....."Don't ask, Don't tell"  is going to die...homosexuals will be invited to come out.

You know in order to make good on his ideology of re-distributing the wealth, spreading it around....taxes across the board will go up.

And then there is universal health care....

Just out of curiosity what is so wrong with this one?

I understand the arguments for and against the other items you posted, whether I agree or disagree with you is a different matter, but this one I just don't get what is so wrong with getting rid of "Don't ask, Don't tell" and letting members of our military be open about themselves?

You probably fell asleep during the "Ummms" and "Uhhhhhhs".

There are openly gay people in the military right now, they just are not supposed to mention it to their commanders.  As official policy, don't ask don't tell is silly. If a guy wants to put his life on the line for his country, then more power to him, he deserves nothing but respect for that. 

As a general guideline, don't ask don't tell is not a bad idea--military commanders just don't need that information.  And it should extend further than sexuality into all sorts of personal information that commanders don't need from their soldiers. 

(And also, it should extend beyond the military into everyday life. If I don't ask, you don't need to tell me... whatever it is. )

EL-Duderino posts:

My husband and 5 brothers are veterans and so we've had an interesting discussion on this topic.

According to one of his spokesmen, Obama is planning to ask Congress to repeal the 1993 statute that strictly prohibits homosexuals, that is, those who are openly praciticing and talking about it, from serving in the military. Imo, he's doing so for payback for their strong financial and political support in advancement of their agena which is none other than official societal acceptance of homosexuality, which lifting the military ban would amount to.  

If he does, expect bigger problems to result....I read a while ago I think from American Legion magazine that military surveys of active duty personnel found that 10% said they would leave the military as soon as possible and an additional 14% said they would end their careers.  

Sexual harrassment from both sides is bound to occur. The majority of military personnel's beliefs run contrary to accepting homosexuality...yet, with this comes forced cohabitation, and therefore there is always going to be a constant disciplinary tension amongst personnel which is counter productive to a nation's military force.

One of my brother's argued that it's an individual thing not a sexual thing...but if the ban is lifted a whole new set of forced "sensitivity training programs will be installed beyond the ones installed by Clinton's don't ask, don't tell policy. Open and practicing homosexuals in the military and forced sensitivity training programs to accept their sexual practices is political correctness gone amok.

yer kidding me right? After the pogroms in Russia after the "socialists" {communists} took over how can any Jew think this?

Yes the cost of this is coming from where?

I could see where this could cause problems for rednecks and bigots in the military to shower with "QUEERS" Know what I mean? There are lots of military that are rednecks and bigots.

Come to think of it, unless he is in front of a teleprompter he does hem and haw quite a bit.

We have Bill Clinton to thank for this particular mess, He promised to open the doors in the military for gays then when push came to shove, he came up with don't ask, don't tell. What a crock.

This answer is wonderful and RIGHT ON THE MONEY!!!!! Can you just imagine a redneck stuck in a foxhole during a firefight with two openly feminine gay men?

I can just hear some of the remarks, will there be new laws? What happens when a valuable member of the armed forces calls a gay a queer? will he be court marshaled? What will happen when a gay tells someone, "come on dear, you need to come out of the closet" How about Outing men or women that do not want it known they are gay? What a can of worms!!!!

From what I have heard there are NO openly gay people in the military.  There may be gay people in the military but if let anyone know that they are gay they put their careers on the line.  If you ask me if someone can be openly heterosexual in the military then homosexuals should be allowed to be open as well.

My question then becomes how is this any different then when women were first allowed to be in the military?  Isn't the military better by allowing women in?  And while I don't have the numbers I do know that there are plenty of openly gay men and women who would like nothing more than to serve in the military but aren't allowed to.  Some of these people are fluent in arabic and could have helped out tremendously at the start of are war on terror but they weren't allowed to serve, or were discharged because they were open about their sexuality.

I'm not saying it would be a painless transition but I would imagine the transition would be very similar to when women were first allowed to serve.

MM, just look at the population that favor the democrats.  You remember So Daiho right?  He talked extensively about Tikkun Olam.  This is essentially Rabbinical Propaganda coming from socialized Rabbis from Europe.  

They are sold on the ideology of fairness, peace, harmony etc. for everyone which is controlled and enforced by the government. 

I agree with you though.

Russia: Pogroms, sent to Siberia, Stalin's concentration camps to be built in modern day Kazakhstan (stalin was assasinated the night before he was to sign into action.

Germany: Nazis need I say more?

China: Communists wiped out many of the Jewish populations that were found in northern China. 

Spain: Spanish Inquisition (a theocratical type of socialism run by the Catholic Church).

What I am finding interesting is dictators and facism which is often associated with the extreme right all stem back to socialistic regimes?

Jews have often been credited with their success in history due to their emphasis on learning and education.  Much of this education is based upon our history but for some reason the connection of "socialism is bad for us" is missed.

EL-DUDERINO POSTS:

And for good reason. It's necessary given the unique circumstances of military service.  

The key word is open which means homosexual conduct. The current law  prohibits against homosexual conduct stating,  

“The presence in the armed forces of persons who demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability,”.

Military law is even-handed....no kind of sexual misconduct is acceptable.  

The net effect isn't different becasue once we integrated women into an all male institution,the problems with sexual misconduct went up. Common sense tells us that if we add homosexual men and women to the mix, the male-male/ female-female problems will multiply.  

I can't believe that the current troops in the military want open homosexuality in the armed services.

I don't like the { }. Makes it difficult to read.