1) A willingness to cross party lines and listen to both sides and their issues.
2) An end, for the love of all good, to the name-calling, the mudslinging, and the prejudices of and by both parties against both parties.
3) A concentrated effort by the Government to uphold the Constitution of the United States, including (but not limited to) separation of Church and State.
4) If issues that affect people nationally (i.e. Gay marriage) are to be decided, let the states vote for or against said issues.
5) An end to the needless outsourcing of jobs.
6) A realization that the children of this country represent our future and ensure that educational institutions have proper funding.
7) A concentrated effort by both parties to work together for the better of this country.
8) A foreign policy that respects the opinions of world leaders with whom we conduct trade and business.
9) A domestic policy that ensures the right of privacy, of freedom of speech, and one that does not limit our civil rights needlessly.
10) Free beer would be nice.
Sorry, bit of nervous humor there at the end.
CraigAllan
1) I think Bush already tried that (remember the education bill that he let Kennedy write?), and you see where it got him? The Ball is in The Dems court now.
2) Muzzle Gore!
3) Who has not been upholding it? That one just does not make sense. SOrry.
4) That is how an Amendment is passed. By the States.
5) Tell that to the Heinz company. Or do you mean HOnda and Toyota outsourcing to us?
6) I disagree. Having worked in education, the funding and control has to come from the local level. Get the Feds out of it.
7) Ball is in the Democrats court again. Bush has lost enough fingers to the biters
8) Respects yes, kow tows to, no.
9) Self evident
10) Definitely!
ll
| 6) I disagree. Having worked in education, the funding and control has to come from the local level. Get the Feds out of it. |
That leaves poorer districts out in the cold with no chance to compete and their children lost in another generation without prospects.
| Reply #5 By: whoman69 - 11/3/2004 11:56:18 PM 6) I disagree. Having worked in education, the funding and control has to come from the local level. Get the Feds out of it. That leaves poorer districts out in the cold with no chance to compete and their children lost in another generation without prospects. |
I've said it before and I'll say it again! This SHOULD NOT be a federal problem. The state should take care of it's schools.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting and posting on the forums.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!