As someone who's still on the fence for various reasons (Obama supports universal healthcare, for example, and no government in the world has gotten that one right, so I have no hope of ours doing it, while McCain is way too hawkish and not diplomatic enough) I have to say, I got fed up of hearing talking points about midway through the debate.
I did see Gov. Palin give 90-second awnsers that in no way matched the questions, which caused an eyebrow raise. And I think if I hear the words "Maverick" or "Up In Alaska" much more I'll vomit.
At the same time, Biden wasn't much better - some of his awnsers were a little too practiced, and he spent a lot of time trying to put the comparison in people's heads of McCain -> George W. Bush, when he should be focusing on the specific policies he feels show this and not such a broad stroke. I did notice and appreciate his actual emotion when he spoke about some of his family's past troubles, as opposed to Sarah who I think more and more uses her special needs child as a campaign tool.
Sidenote: I've read so much rhetoric from both sides throughout this election I think we should take out the party system entirely at this point. It seems to be inspiring some very emotional decisions about what should be simple logic - an example of this is Island Dog's first post -
Yeah, I loved how he kept using the word "fair". When a liberal says "fair", you better watch your back because you are about to be screwed.
That's something I'd kind of expect to hear out of a pundit/mouthpeice like Rush Limbaugh or Olbermann (against conservatives). The fact that the average voter will make such a broad brushstroke against a civil servant based on wether they have a D or R in thier name is an epidemic. (Not lashing out at you, ID, you just made a really good example of my point. Nothing personal against you for it.)