Island Dog Island Dog

Bush Tried to Overhaul Housing Finance Industry

Bush Tried to Overhaul Housing Finance Industry

Democrats Opposed

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE7DB153EF933A0575AC0A96F958260

I found this article today, and please take note of the date.

In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders. The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring. Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.
End of quote

Very interesting, right?

Now let's look at a bill that Bush and republicans tried to pass back in 2003.

The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.

Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry.

End of quote

Wow, sounds like it might have helped....

But democrats said....

''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''
End of quote

And they (democrats) eventually killed the proposal.  This is what you will see with an Obama administration.

 

 

8,074 views 28 replies
Reply #26 Top

It was already to late and as I've said before the bills that were proposed did nothing to correct the problem.They did not add any oversight they simply moved the oversight from one dept to another.
End of quote

Enough! There was oversight, the people who did the oversight reported to the Congress and on the record, instead of arresting the people involved the democrats attacked the oversight! They screamed how wonderful it was all working, disputed the reports of corruption, and blamed the republicans for being racist in believing the reports from the oversight. It was not both sides to blame it was one side that started with the Carter Administration and it got worse from there. Any and every attempt to control the mess was argued to be racism. The press complied with this and should also be punished. The only difference between this and Enron is that Enron was a private sector greed that was able to correct itself and the GSE’s are created by congress and they refuse to admit fault or that anything was wrong until it reached a point of destroying our economy. Just like voting against Senator Obama is somehow racist. Ignore the fact that he is an empty suit with no real ideas on how to “change” things because he does not know how anything works. Voting against Senator Clinton is misogynist, ignore the fact that what she wants to do it just as bad as Senator Obama yet when a woman is brought up on the republican side all the misogynic crap came out in force and no one on the left had a single complaint. Senator Clinton was experience because she was married to a president but never had and executive position. Governor Palin was a mayor and now a governor but some how she has no qualifications, and is a bad mother for working outside the home.

 

Admit the truth and the few points you make will have some validity.

Reply #27 Top

if both parties would have at least recognized the problems
End of quote

They did. But they both decided to hide it in their own ways.

singing about what a nice sunny day it was
End of quote

Thats what the stock market is all about.

 

Neither party is on the publics side. One day a lot of people will wake up and realize this.

Reply #28 Top

Neither party is on the publics side.
End of quote

 

And on that we can agree.