No. It is because the VP of that party is very very scary.
Scary only to girly men. 
She said she ended the bid for the bridge to nowhere, not true in fact she is still behind"a bridge" project for that same area.
No,that is exageration - or embellishment. And is done all the time in politics. She DID end the bridge to nowhere. Whether she was always against it or was just being politically expedient is another matter (and part of politics). But this is the second time someone has tried to call embellishment a lie. Why is it a lie when a conservative does it, and not when a liberal does it? When John Kerry said he killed all the commies, why was that not a lie? When Obama says he single handedly passed a bill, why is that not a lie?
She said that Alaska supplies 20% of the US energy, not true.
It is not true they supply 20% of ALL the US energy types. It is definitely true of some types. So it is again not a lie.
Plus she cant even go out on her own, she has to have McCain or his handler holding her hand everywhere and she wont answer questions.
I did not see McCain on Gibson's or Hannity's show. See, that is a lie (what you just stated) because of the way you stated it.
"Who is Sarah Palin?"
Who is Joe Biden? Well, we do know that. A lying hypocritical baby killing (yes, he beleives life begins at conception but likes to kill them anyway) plagarizing font of hoof-in-mouth disease.
But who cares? He is not president, and as much as all the loons on the left like to think Cheney was darth vader, VPs ar only Jeopardy questions.
But all of this still begs the question. Why is Obama running against Palin?