Paladin77 Paladin77

Governor Palin is proof the left is wrong

Governor Palin is proof the left is wrong

For decades I have heard that the republicans are the party of hate, republicans are religious nuts that want to force religion down everyone’s throats, the Republican Party hates women and women’s rights, the Republican Party are sexist, bigoted, racist, homophobes that only care about the rich.

 

Along comes Governor Palin and the lies told by the left are easier to see, but have been visible for years.

 

Ronald Reagan said of Colin Powel that he was in his mind an Irishman. When General Powel was promoted from President Reagan’s national security advisor, the first black man to have that post, to chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he became the first black man to have that post. When he was promoted to Secretary of State he again was the first black man to have that post. Not all that racist in my point of view.

 

Doctor Condoleezza Rice became the first woman to hold the post of Presidential National Security Advisor, hard to be sexist with that. First Black woman to become Secretary of State, Yup sexist, and racism abounds in the Republican Party.

 

Who was offered an opportunity to be the first black president? General Colin Powel. He turned it down.

 

When President Bush won his reelection to president who was suggested to replace him?  Dr. Condoleezza Rice.

 

Senator McCain was looking for a running mate and chose Governor Palin, not because she was a woman but because she was a conservative and an executive.

 

The difference between republicans and democrats is that the republicans will only choose people that are qualified for the job rather than trying to make a statement, or gain political points.

On the other side of the political coin we have the democrats, they had Shirley Chisholm as the first female black candidate for president.  Once she made her political points she was pushed aside, then we had Jessie Jackson, he made his political points and was pushed aside. Then we had the Reverend Sharpton, he made his mark and was bought off. The party of inclusion is only inclusive during election years.

 

Representative Harold Ford Jr. had the votes to become Speaker of the house. The democrats did not want him so he was pushed aside for Representative Pelosi. Because he let it be known that he was being pushed aside the party refused to fund his reelection. He ran for Senator and they shorted him on funding to ensure he lost.

 

I forget the man’s name that was running for governor of New York but the party wanted a white man in there so they cut off promised funding allowing the republican to win the election.

 

Senator Clinton was running for president and everyone lined up to support her until Senator Obama threw his hat in the ring. The promised support disappeared faster than a fart in a high wind. The chance to make history is more important than putting the best they have forward.

 

The republicans would rather have senator McCain as our representative for president because the voters chose him even though he is a liberal. To counter his liberal leanings he chose a conservative to add balance to his administration. Because he is a Senator he chose an executive to balance his lack of actual leadership. He is doing what is best for his country.

 

The democrats want Senator Obama because he is not Senator Clinton. He chose another senator that has a reputation for plagiarism, out right lying, and saying anything that will get him elected to balance Senator Obama’s lack of actual leadership experience, his actual lack of military experience, his lack of business experience, his misunderstanding of anything needed for the job as president other than that he is black.

 

So we have two balanced tickets that show what each party stands for.

 

One of lies, half truths, bigoted reasoning, racist ideals, sexist agenda, and homophobia.

 

The other party, a desire to improve the nation they serve and doing what is best for the nation even if it is not what may be what is best for the party in the short run.

 

I think the republicans are doing what is best for the nation only because they accepted Governor Palin as the Vice-presidential candidate. It is a balance that will work well for this nation. while at the same time pointing out the lies of their opposition.

 

I think the democrats are doing what is best for themselves, trying to look inclusive while having a history of exclusivity.

 

In nominating Governor Palin it proves the left lied about the republican party. With her wide acceptance it proved that sex is not an issue with republicans.

 

Now look at the response from the inclusive party once they found out she was the choice for VP.

 

Palin is the grandmother, and not the mother, of Trig Palin

 

Palin “Opposes Sex Education”

 

Palin “Wants Creationism Taught in School”

 

Palin Supported a “Nazi Sympathizer”

 

And Palin should be mocked for criticizing anyone's lack of national experience when her's is zero.

 

In no way does her year-and-a-half as governor of Alaska qualify her to be vice president or president of the United States.

 

``She's not qualified, she doesn't have the judgment, to be next in line to the president of the United States,''

 

Kim Gandy of NOW called Palin "a woman who opposes women's rights”

 

And now we learn the 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, is pregnant. She and the father of the child plan to marry. This may be a hard one for the Republican conservative family-values crowd to swallow. Of course, this can happen in any family. But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother.

 

So now we have a woman nominated for the Office of the Vice President of the United States who happens to be a mom. And what's our response?  "Yes, but how will you handle your job and your family?"

This news gave way to a new set of attacks, namely that Palin is a bad parent and hypocrite because of her Christian views and support of abstinence education.

 

Yet for years we were told by the left that women can do it all, have children, be married, and have a job and this was what was best for women. Now one is running for vice-president for the opposition we find out that the lies told to us about republicans was really the thoughts and projections of the left of themselves.

13,356 views 38 replies
Reply #26 Top

I was not spouting my views I was just stating history. I believe that Senator Dole would have been a better president that Mr. Clinton. But he was a governor so he had the experience that people trust. I believe that Senator McCain will be a lousy president but he will win unless he trips up on something stupid. Senator Obama has already stumbled in Germany forcing him to make a bad choice in his VP which is costing him. His numbers are in free fall, instead of getting a bounce after the convention he is in negative numbers going from 12 points up to even and when the republicans had their convention Senator McCain bounced up as much as 10 points. This will fade but he got a bounce unlike Senator Obama.

 

The democrat strategy of getting Governor Palin removed from the ticket in 8 to 10 days failed and worse only bolstered her positives while angering women on both sides of the isle. Had the governor used Senator Clinton’s play book and played the victim she would have been badly hurt if not hated, instead she attacked and made people proud to support her. She stood by her beliefs and people admire that in a leader. Senator Biden is an embarrassment to the party and the candidate. They are looking to dump him and maybe even dump Senator Obama. Can’t wait to see the next brilliant strategy they come up with.

Reply #27 Top

sorry dup post

Reply #28 Top

Obama has more experience than Clinton.
End of quote

I tend to disagree a little.  Sleeping with a president is the 2nd best experience as being the president.  We have seen numerous examples (and then some counter examples) of Spouses taking over for their departed mates, and doing a decent - if not great job.

However, there is 2 problems with that experience.  Of course the first is that the spouse is not the one actually making the decisions, so they do not get the full pressure of the job. The second of course is do you really want to put on your resume that your experience is "sleeping your way to the top"?

 

Reply #29 Top

The second of course is do you really want to put on your resume that your experience is "sleeping your way to the top"?
End of quote

I don't know, look how well it wotked for Senator Clinton. First lady to Senator from New York.

Reply #30 Top

I don't know, look how well it wotked for Senator Clinton. First lady to Senator from New York.
End of quote

Leona Helmsley, john Kerry, Marla Trump, Anna Nicole Smith, etc.

Do you really want to be in their company? ;)

Reply #31 Top

Leona Helmsley, john Kerry, Marla Trump, Anna Nicole Smith, etc.

Do you really want to be in their company?
End of quote

you sound like one of those racist, sexist, bigoted, liberal. You need to be more accepting of the weak willed, weak minded people that can’t survive without the kindness of rich people to support them.

Reply #32 Top

you sound like one of those racist, sexist, bigoted, liberal
End of quote

Was I that good? ;)

Reply #33 Top

The difference between republicans and democrats is that the republicans will only choose people that are qualified for the job rather than trying to make a statement, or gain political points
End of quote

Yeah, I mean just look at the choice of Palin! Oh wait...

 

Senator Clinton was running for president and everyone lined up to support her until Senator Obama threw his hat in the ring. The promised support disappeared faster than a fart in a high wind. The chance to make history is more important than putting the best they have forward
End of quote

I know, it was so frustrating seeing Obama labelled as the frontrunner and having more pledged superdelegates for all of the initial part of the contest and along to super-tuesday. Especially annoying to not hear a single person talk of how Clinton could end up becoming the first US female president in history.

 

The democrats want Senator Obama because he is not Senator Clinton. He chose another senator that has a reputation for plagiarism, out right lying, and saying anything that will get him elected to balance Senator Obama’s lack of actual leadership experience, his actual lack of military experience, his lack of business experience, his misunderstanding of anything needed for the job as president other than that he is black.

End of quote

 

So we have two balanced tickets that show what each party stands for.

One of lies, half truths, bigoted reasoning

End of quote

You don't have to attack your post quite so soon...hold on, you weren't referring to what you just typed just then?

The other party, a desire to improve the nation they serve and doing what is best for the nation even if it is not what may be what is best for the party in the short run
End of quote

It's not all bad - I mean you can always hope the republicans might be the same in time as well

They lie and lie and we are tired of it.
End of quote

It's always refreshing to hear someone say this after they've done just that!

 

Reply #34 Top

 

Yeah, I mean just look at the choice of Palin! Oh wait...
End of quote

And what do you see as wrong with Governor Palin?

It's always refreshing to hear someone say this after they've done just that!
End of quote

Please point them out.

Reply #35 Top

And what do you see as wrong with Governor Palin?
End of quote
Seems to be somewhat of Falwell's agency of intolerance even though she scripted to Gibson that she would come together with Choice adherents--echoing Obama--to reduce abortions. She's too provincial minded in trumpeting energy in behalf of her state that would profit enormously be drill, drill, drill. She's subtly dragging out the age old "family values" by flamboyantly parading her family. But, hell, I still have no qualms with her as VP; the Republicans needed something fresh.:yes:   

Reply #36 Top

Seems to be somewhat of Falwell's agency of intolerance even though she scripted to Gibson that she would come together with Choice adherents--echoing Obama--to reduce abortions. She's too provincial minded in trumpeting energy in behalf of her state that would profit enormously be drill, drill, drill. She's subtly dragging out the age old "family values" by flamboyantly parading her family. But, hell, I still have no
End of quote

Don’t you think that it is your own prejudices coming out rather than what she says it is what you want to hear in those words that upsets you? She has lived the life, walked the walk as well as talked the talk of someone that has a set of values and lives within them. This to me is what we should be looking for in a leader rather than one that will say what it takes to get elected and then never follows through on the promises. I see the Governor as one that was just doing her duty and when called to a higher duty accepted. I don’t think she sought out the job which to me is a plus.

 

What did she say that made you think she was scripted?

Reply #37 Top

And what do you see as wrong with Governor Palin?
End of quote

I never said I saw things wrong with Palin, I was referring to the motives for picking her. Namely it seems she was picked both because she was a woman (help improve republican's standing amongst women, and in particular appeal to disillusioned clinton supporters) and a staunch right-wing conservative (help shore up traditional republican support which was a bit dubious/lukewarm wrt McCain). In other words she was picked because McCain thought she would be the VP candidate that would give him the best chance of victory, which isn't exactly a 'long-term picking-the-best-person(for the country)' action

Anyway, as to the lies/half-truths, here are a few:

The difference between republicans and democrats is that the republicans will only choose people that are qualified for the job rather than trying to make a statement, or gain political points
End of quote

The party of inclusion is only inclusive during election years
End of quote

The chance to make history is more important than putting the best they have forward
End of quote

The democrats want Senator Obama because he is not Senator Clinton
End of quote

[Obama's] misunderstanding of anything needed for the job as president other than that he is black
End of quote

So we have two balanced tickets that show what each party stands for.

 

One of lies, half truths, bigoted reasoning, racist ideals, sexist agenda, and homophobia.

 

The other party, a desire to improve the nation they serve and doing what is best for the nation even if it is not what may be what is best for the party in the short run

End of quote

 

Reply #38 Top

 

I never said I saw things wrong with Palin, I was referring to the motives for picking her. Namely it seems she was picked both because she was a woman (help improve republican's standing amongst women, and in particular appeal to disillusioned clinton supporters) and a staunch right-wing conservative (help shore up traditional republican support which was a bit dubious/lukewarm wrt McCain). In other words she was picked because McCain thought she would be the VP candidate that would give him the best chance of victory, which isn't exactly a 'long-term picking-the-best-person(for the country)' action
End of quote

Most of what you write may be true, I have no problem with him choosing the person he thinks will best help him win, or to stick it to the democrats that have been promoting women for decades, while telling women that the republicans hate women and women’s rights. Sure, Senator Clinton was dumped by the party because she is a lousy leader with huge negatives, not because she is a woman.

Until he chose the Governor I was not planning on voting for him, so he did shore up his base but not because he picked a woman. The purpose is to pick a running mate that will help not hurt the ticket. He could have chosen any woman in the party for the above purposes.

 

The Senator chose the Governor because he needed someone with executive experience. He chose her because she is a woman, he chose her because she is a conservative. It balances the ticket as I wrote earlier. In choosing the Governor, he was thinking long term rather than just the above reasons. He chose someone that if need be can stand in and take over to do the job that will have the support of the party. That is the best person for the country rather than picking someone to beat the democrats. In choosing the Governor it tells me that his judgment is sound and he is not running for president because he wants to be president but because he believes he can do some good for this nation. For example Governor Clinton wanted to become president, he did but had no idea what to do once he got the job. His presidency achieved little, he did little other than work on his legacy, for 8 years the nation was leaderless. He was not the only president on either side of the isle that did this but he is the most recent. None of the things he said he wanted to do was done that I can remember. I see Senator Obama as another Mr. Clinton he wants the job to make history, but has no idea what to do once he gets there.

Anyway, as to the lies/half-truths, here are a few:
End of quote

 Listing my statements does not point out lies or half truths. What is it in your opinion that makes them lies or half truths?