Double Posts are not a family value! ;~D

Ah, a deliciously ambiguous term.  All families have different values...so what the hell does this term actually mean?  It can be interpreted in a variety of contexts.

Ah, but that's why I prefer to stay out of politics...too much bullshit on either side and not enough shovels in the world to deal with it.

~Zoo

Not aborting a child with Down syndrome and being there for your pregnant daughter are family values I do respect.

No, what the parents do = Family Values. 

I find it hilarious that liberals are now arguing children are Stepford!  When they have tried their damnedest to usurp parent authority in virtually all matters (It takes a village idiot).

Perhaps if liberals realize all they are doing is picking on children, they will stop this stupidity.  But then intelligence was never a requirement for liberalism.

That truth hurts, that's all I have to say.

Getting pregnant from rape and not having a choice = human rights?

Women not having a choice what to do with their bodies = equality?

All I'm saying is a lot of conservatives prefer abstinence and not teaching about contraceptives. Now assumeing this was an unplanned pregnancy, which since it's out of wedlock I assume it is, maybe Sarah Palin and other conservatives should reconsider their stance on contraceptives.

Not to say that this baby will be a 'mistake' or anything of the sort, but it would make the childs life ALOT easier since wether we like it or not, her personal life will be thrusted out into the public eye since her mother is now on the ticket for VP.

All I know is, the savaging of Sarah Palin and her family has just begun.  There is no way the sexists in NOW, the incompetent press and the far left are going to allow a conservative Republican to be the first Woman VP.   They are going to pull out all the stops in the sleaze department to make sure that doesn't happen.

In the end though, whether Palin becomes VP or not, NOW, the incompent press and the far left are going to have exposed themselves for who they are.  They don't give a flying flip about women's rights at all.  They care about furthering leftists.   That is ok of course, I mean, they are free to work towards getting leftists elected, but the lie of "women's rights" will be laid bare.

Actually, it already has, but those whose religion is abortion won't admit it to save their lives.

Yet another similarity between abortion on demand and legal Black slavery.  The idea that one person can own another.  Equality is, neither men nor woman can kill a fetus.  Your own example shows the inequality of the "pro choice" argument.

My example could be spun either way then depending on when you believe life begins. Excellent example though.

By the way anyone watching the Ron Paul convention on CSPAN-2?

You know why Because it can think

It has blood flowing through its body and a working circulatiory system

It can breathe

I only think abortion during the first quater of pregnancy when some of these things dont work

Not LEGALLY!  Before Roe v Wade, ANYONE could get an abortion too.  Just not always LEGALLY.  Again your logic is critically flawed.  What right to privacy (your body) do you have?  Can you legally commit suicide?  No. Can you sell your organs?  No.  Can you put Cocaine, Heroine, LSD, Meth, etc into it legally?  No.  So what can you do with your body legally?  Not a whole hell of a lot.

So where is the equality?  The ONLY right to privacy with A body has been bestowed on women, none on men.  Name one!

Your logic is flawed, and your arguement worse.

Which is particularly sad. I am by no means a fan of drugs, but if someone wants to use and abuse them, go for it. Survival of the smartest, lol. Seriously though, it's sad that when it comes to taking care of ourselves - there's government regulation. You'd think we don't know what is best for us...

*bristles* Ugh, and again I make the statement - just because A liberal makes an ignorant and stupid remark, doesn't mean we're all that way. Politics...love it yet hate it.

~L