Hillary for VP

from JoeUser Forums

 

Hillary for VP

 

Those who wish unhesitatingly for Hillary as VP should reconsider. Beyond her being simply [to no avail] a nagging gadfly to Obama, she would preëmpt Michelle as First Lady, and worse, be lamed if Obama lost.

Moreover, had Carter chosen Ted, Massachusetts would have lost a powerful legislative voice in the Senate as New York would lose Hillary’s.

preempt legislative ted democrat
8,663 views 16 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
Moreover, had Carter chosen Ted, Massachusetts would have lost a powerful legislative voice in the Senate as New York would lose Hillary’s.
End of quote


That is a reason for it, not against it!

But picking hillary would solidify my vote against Obama. He still has a shot at it (and a pretty good one considering his positions), but that would make me vote against him.
Reply #2 from Stardock Forums Top

You're not the only one afflicted with hillaryitus. [Translated mysogyny]:(

Star Control: Origins
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
You're not the only one afflicted with hillaryitus. [Translated mysogyny]
End of quote


Nope. NOt all women are Bitches, but Hillary is. Just because I cannot stand Hillary does not make me misogynist, just like not all people not voting for Obama are racists.

Bad logic.
Reply #4 from Stardock Forums Top

Hillary shouldn't be VP.  You put the strongest candidate on the TOP of the ticket. 

Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
Loca is right where is John Edwards when we need him?
Reply #6 from Stardock Forums Top

Loca is right where is John Edwards when we need him?
End of quote
  groans

Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
Jessie Jackson would make a perfect VP, If the good reverend has his way then we will have the first woman president as well as the first black president. Sorry, I mean the second black president, forgot about Mr. Clinton.
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
You put the strongest candidate on the TOP of the ticket.
End of quote


Angelina?! :) Or maybe Brad Pitt.
Then again, I'm with Pal--why not Edwards.
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
Just because I cannot stand Hillary
End of quote


Okay, I'll try womanizer. How about Paris Hilton? Why not make the White House a hotel for Bimbos? ;) 
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
Okay, I'll try womanizer. How about Paris Hilton? Why not make the White House a hotel for Bimbos?
End of quote


Why do you have to pick the worst examples of the fairer gender? ;)
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
Why do you have to pick the worst examples of the fairer gender?
End of quote


Because any female with any sense would run screaming, not walk to the nearest exit if asked to work for President Obama. The only ones that would have him are the less reputable of the fairer sex.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
less reputable of the fairer sex.
End of quote


Well, that is indeed true. ;)
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
Why do you have to pick the worst examples of the fairer gender?
End of quote


Sorry, how about Monica Lewinski as an upgrade?
The only ones that would have him are the less reputable of the fairer sex.
End of quote


Rosie O'Donnell will muscle her way in.
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
According to McCain's ad Britney or Paris will do.
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
It looks like it is going to be an all Old Dominion bottom to the tickets. I can see the value in both, and the flaws.

Kaine (besides being incompetant in his position) also suffers from the same thing Obama does - in-experience. But on the plus side, they say the state is in play so a swing to the left may clinch the election.

Cantor is not well known, so it may just be a reaction to Kaine. But he is a solid conservative.

We will know in a few weeks.