To Anyone Who Plays the Sins of A Solar Empire SP

Come Online, we need more players online...

Seriously...Please...
279,435 views 81 replies
Reply #2 Top
Sorry, but no thanks. I'm not a big online gaming fan. I need a gaming experience that I can drop on a second's notice because one of the RetroKids is into something, or because RetroWife is giving me "that look". I can't guarantee I'll be ever able to devote a full hour to an MP game experience. :)

-- Retro
+1 Loading…
Reply #3 Top
I know what you mean retro. I don't even buy games anymore unless they have a significant single player portion to them. Online just isn't really an option. Damn Life! :P
Reply #4 Top
Maybe when the game actually rewards strategic thought and fleet combinations. Until them, I'll avoid the LRM spam thankyou. ;)
Reply #5 Top
Come Online, we need more players online...Seriously...Please...
No.

The AI doesn't disconnect half way through a game because you took out its favorite planet. It also doesn't spam annoying messages or predictably spam the same long range frigates all day long either. When you outplay it, the AI also doesn't whine and moan about it or accuse you of cheating. Also, if the game gets too long, you can save and be sure the AI will be there when you get more time to play.

I couldn't play online right now if I wanted to. I refuse to 'upgrade' from 1.04 to 1.05 due to the game-breaking malice nerf. Most of my buddies I'd play this game online with have kind of had enough of it, except when a particular mod gets updated with new content.
Reply #6 Top
When someone quits the AI takes over so it becomes like singleplayer haha :P
Reply #7 Top
Once I learn the game mechanics, I do plan to try online, but I've only had the game 2 days, and right now it takes me 5 minutes to figure out what to do next.

Plus, I frequently zoom and rotate the map to see how cool everything looks, which I can get away with on easy level!  :LOL: 

Reply #9 Top
All i here is whine whine whine. LRM spam doesn't win games. I think some of u just dont want a bruised ego, and the rest are cynical about humanity in general.
Reply #10 Top
If I go online to play I'll Just play EVE, but I have no connection at home...
Reply #11 Top
You're not helping your case CommanderAdama.

How the hell does that make them "cynical about humanity in general?"

If anything, you're detracting from people going online.

And for me, I would go online, but prefer LAN with my friends. Also, I don't think I'm good enough for the crazy awesome online-RTS players.

And all the other reasons listed above are good enough to support SP.

- PR-0927
Reply #12 Top
Went to play CS at a college LAN function, decided to check out Starcraft for the first time. The assholes decided to rig a game and put me on the opposing team because they didn't like the other assholes they were playing. Not that they weren't already using a map hack. So I join the enemy team, what the hell, it would be a learning experience. Five seconds in one of the guys is telling us who's what and where, fucking cheaters are everywhere. Being a good sport I thwarted the rush, they lost anyway though, the one guy at the LAN was the #2 player at the time and had been #1 at points. Ok, so the cheating pricks rigging games at the LAN party became the not so prick pricks that were doing the same shit their opponents were. Never mind that everyone acted like a 12 year old with a ten second attention span. God forbid you don't play perfectly too.

Played Red Alert online, or tried to. Couldn't get a game started, no one would play a "noob". Of course, I was a long time player with fast fingers and probably would have plowed them all, but I hadn't created an account for Westwood online till that particular game had been out a couple years. So ended my thirst to play RA online, conceited assholes the lot of them.

Then comes RA2, with the most entertaining infantry. Shitty balance beyond compare, but I was amused by the units and wanted to anyway. I lasted about a week. One of the guys in the top fifty said I had potential to go all the way up the rankings, but I needed a map hack to make the playing field even. Yay... another one bites the dust.

Every time I check out the online community of an RTS, it gets worse. I can honestly say that my move to a satellite connection hasn't hurt that much. They only clean up after they die and almost no one is left playing.

The best experience I had was playing Warlords:Battlecry with a small group of absolutely nutty fans that had braved the severe netcode and balance problems to stick the game out all the way to the release of its sequel. They were fun to play, didn't mind playing with someone that sucked, and even better, didn't mind getting the shit kicked out of them by a new guy on his second game. Class acts almost entirely. Darn those fringe games released by smaller publishers.

My friends,(and I have very high standards even for real life relationships, you don't rate higher than acquaintance unless I really like you) on playing all the assholes that showed up for the second iteration published by ubisoft, left. I even got to find out that the best player from the previous was cheating to maintain his image. My best experience of an online community, by leaps and bounds, consisted of less than a dozen regulars, one of whom cheated to win.

To be a cynic, your view must be unfounded. Bad experiences jilting your views of people you meet later on. I've not seen any change in the pattern since I started playing. If anything, it's gotten worse with the rise of gaming in Asia. RTS is fairly tame too, if you really want to be hacked you need to play FPS or dungeon crawlers like Diablo. The entire team dying five seconds into a round really rocked in cs. I quit bothering with the general populations not because I'm a cynic, although that's probably true as well, but because I'm not a complete fucking retard. Online gaming with the masses is decidedly un-fun.

This isn't a life and death struggle, it's a game. It's supposed to be entertainment, not a cheat to win, scour the new guys, cut throat industry. If the community for Sins were a nice, fun to play community, every other post on the forums wouldn't be about balance. I'd show up if the posts were a little less complaint riddled and a little more fun involved.
Reply #13 Top
As soon as I think I'm good enough, I'll connect to ICO and let one of you guys give me reality check.
Reply #14 Top
To be honest I think the online portion of this game is the best part, and it's finished... the singleplayer is pathetic really, just a skirmish? I feel a bit ripped off :P

If you buy this game, in my opinion, it's for the multiplayer; and I love it :)
Reply #15 Top
All i here is whine whine whine. LRM spam doesn't win games. I think some of u just dont want a bruised ego, and the rest are cynical about humanity in general.


I'm working two jobs until college starts back up, and then I have to make sure that I make it through my senior year. I don't have time for online, I need something that I can drop in when I have time and save/quit when I need to go.

I'll meet you half way though, if you are willing to provide the income that my second job is bringing in, then I will devote the free time to playing Sins online against you. ;)
Reply #16 Top
All i here is whine whine whine. LRM spam doesn't win games. I think some of u just dont want a bruised ego, and the rest are cynical about humanity in general.
Hi, no again, I'm neither of those things, and you've just reinforced my decision not to play online.

-- Retro
Reply #17 Top
I'm getting a new computer first then will join the online. I get freeze ups once in a while on my old computer. Oh and SP is so fun but will try Multi out.
Reply #18 Top
All i here is whine whine whine. LRM spam doesn't win games. I think some of u just dont want a bruised ego, and the rest are cynical about humanity in general.
What is a win? What is a loss? It's literally a collection of electrical signals representing 1's and 0's. A win is merely a unit of data incremented in the win field, and a loss is merely a unit of data incremented in the loss field. Achievements, ranks, and promotions are literally commonly a mere binary toggle from 0 to 1 that links with some other collection of binary data that creates the image of a badge, ranking symbol, achievement, or victory screen. A ranking is a mere ordering of all players in a database based on an algorithm that can be changed as simple as altering a line of code or two. How people derive egos and bragging rights from mere electrical data that can be created and erased as easy as a text message can, baffles me.

To assume an aversion to online play as mere cynicism is naive. You are a random person to someone like me. I don't know you, I've never met you, and you just visit this forum and play the same game I periodically play. You could change your screen name just by registering a new account and so could I. Who you are does not make a difference to someone like me. Likewise, the rest of the multiplayer and competitive communities thus have no importance to me. So someone can maneuver their 1's and 0's better than someone else? Big deal... If it mattered at all now, it will not matter for sure a few months from now. All those people wasting their time stat padding and ranking up in Battlefield 2 have fallen to obscurity. Likewise, those at the top here will meet the same fate soon enough.

So why play the game? The answer: to have fun. Single player is a consistent experience that provides fun. Playing online with selected friends also delivers a consistent experience that's commonly fun. Playing online with random internet people is a complete mystery. It could go well or it could go terrible, and everything in between. Hopefully this helps you understand.
Reply #19 Top
unfortuantely, I have not been able to figure out how to play online. I would love to, but it ain't gonna happen. I have read the tutorials. I just can't make it work. Somewhere somehow soething is blocking something.
Reply #20 Top
I do not enjoy competitive play. I prefer experimentation, strategic trickery, and goofing off.
Reply #21 Top
Psychoak, your post is EXACTLY what I would have put together if I tried to regale everyone with my tales of online multiplayer woe. However, I've generally had far less luck (and fun) than even you have and with the lack of the trust factor regarding hacks, cheats, or whatever, I decided a long time ago that I'm NEVER playing an RTS online again with anyone but friends. I'm older now and the frustration involved makes it a complete waste of time for me.

I do play FPS on occasion with the rest of the world (i.e., games like TF2) but needless to say those are just as susceptible to hackery as RTS.
Reply #23 Top
All i here is whine whine whine. LRM spam doesn't win games. I think some of u just dont want a bruised ego, and the rest are cynical about humanity in general.


Haha, and you wonder why we don't bother online. If its populated with jerks like you, no thanks. ;)

Reply #25 Top
Is anyone interested in a newbies survival guide to online play?

Aimed a Sp folk who want to go online and newbs online who are struggling. Those that fear ridicule for lack of skill or fear they will let down teammates.

Im thinking of writing one which will take 15-20 hours , lots of screenshots and pictures to make easy to understand. The hope is to iron out the bad habits developed in Sp , and teach players the teamwork and risk evaluation concepts in Mp inorder to give them the foundations to improve at the game.

Just need to see some interest , because this will take me awhile to do.