The Ugly Bush: He Smirks As He Wrongly Smears Kerry

By: blogic Posted: Thursday, October 14, 2004 on The Tide Goes Out Message Board: Politics A moment where we learned something troubling about

it's that he belittles his opponent with showy antics, even when he has no idea if his opponent has actually made a mistake. He's done this same behavior in two debates. Once might have been an unpleasant aberration, but now we know this is an ugly part of Bush's fundamental character.

And Kerry doesn't do that? hmmmmm.

And quite possibly the end of Kerry:

Even if John Kerry is elected, if this makes it through then Kerry won't be president for long. Now the e-mail I'm getting ready to post should in no way be considered fact. However I *can* say that the petition is real.

DATE: 12 October 2004 CAMPAIGN UPDATE: The Petition for Indictment of John Kerry reached its target of 150,000 signatures in September. (This petition for indictment will remain online for informational purposes [see http://patriotpetitions.us/], and will accept additional signatures, which we will report each quarter after the petition for indictment is filed.) Dear Fellow Patriot, The petition for indictment of John Kerry, for "giving aid and comfort to the enemy," and, thus, to disqualify him for national office, has reached its goal of more than 150,000 signatures. On Monday, 18 October, the petition will be delivered by registered courier to Vice President Richard Cheney (in his capacity as Senate President), Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and Attorney General John Ashcroft today. Though John Kerry has an extensive and well-documented record of anti- American activities over the past three decades [see "John Kerry: More aid and comfort..." at http://FederalistPatriot.US/alexander/], it is his acts of treason in 1970-71 that are the subject of this petition for indictment. Our appeal notes both Kerry's violations of the UCMJ (Article 104 part 904) and U.S. Code (18 USC Sec. 2381 and 18 USC Sec. 953), and calls for his disqualification for public office in accordance with the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, which states: "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice- President ... having previously taken an oath ... to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof." Why prosecute John Kerry now? In October 2003, Mr. Kerry chose to make his Vietnam war record the centerpiece of his campaign for the presidency; this has been especially true since his primary victory in March 2004 [see "Kerry's Quagmire..." http://FederalistPatriot.US/alexander/]. In response, more than 165,000 signatories of the above-referenced petition for indictment have made his war record the centerpiece of their campaign to disqualify Kerry from public office. We understand that no action is likely to be taken on this petition until after the 02 November election. Be it known, however, that on 03 November, we will seek full recourse in an effort to have John Kerry prosecuted for acts of treason and disqualified from any future campaign for any national office. We are thus committed to holding Mr. Kerry accountable for his actions, as there is no statute of limitations for acts of treason. Thank you for taking the time to sign this petition for indictment. Rest assured that your voice will be heard. Semper Vigilo, Paratus, et Fidelis!

Bush is a lying fool. Eat your words Drmiller, because every time anything comes up about Kerry you profoundly support it and everytime anything is said about Bush you act like a jerk and start calling people names, flapping your arms about and using mixed up thinking to try to prove to yourself that you are right.

Bush smirks and Kerry frowns ( or can he with that botox injection or did it wear off?)

- Grim X

HAHAHA, I didnt even read this. When I saw the title I made myself a bet that either blogic or T-bone posted this. Score one for me.

Speaking of Bush smirking and Kerry frowning, how about we see the pictures of the actual crimes that took place by the smirker and frowner.

I will try to look for some.

VERSUS

Smirk versus Smile

Reply #3 By: sandy2 - 10/14/2004 7:40:17 PM Bush is a lying fool. Eat your words Drmiller, because every time anything comes up about Kerry you profoundly support it and everytime anything is said about Bush you act like a jerk and start calling people names, flapping your arms about and using mixed up thinking to try to prove to yourself that you are right.

You first.... reread my first lines:

Even if John Kerry is elected, if this makes it through then Kerry won't be president for long. Now the e-mail I'm getting ready to post should in no way be considered fact. However I *can* say that the petition is real.

every time anything comes up about Kerry you profoundly support it and everytime anything is said about Bush you act like a jerk

Sandy, you of all people have no right to say that. If drmiller does this for kerry, you do exactly the same thing for Bush.

If you watched last night, you know Bush made a show of the word "exaggeration," drawing out each syllable, while he grinned at the camera. Too bad Kerry was right.

Kerry was wrong, if you consider stretching the truth(streching a very long way) to be a lie. Kerry WAS greatly exaggerating the fact that Bush "wasn't worried" about Bin Laden. Kerry said this, of course, to scare the ignorant voters out there who probably think Bush and Bin Laden have reached some secret agreement. BUSH DIDNT LIE WHEN HE SAID KERRY WAS EXAGGERATING!!!

where he said to the moderator: "need wood?"

He actually said that while facing Kerry, as I recall, so I think the comment was directed at him.

The only part of your article worthy of a reply.

Cheers,
Daiwa

Even if John Kerry is elected, if this makes it through then Kerry won't be president for long. Now the e-mail I'm getting ready to post should in no way be considered fact. However I *can* say that the petition is real.

Even if the petition gets action to be taken, how has Kerry commited Treason?

Sandy, you of all people have no right to say that. If drmiller does this for kerry, you do exactly the same thing for Bush.

I said that to Drmiller because in another post he called someone who had the same viewpoint as me a jerk. I said he acted like a jerk in doing so.

So it's down to this for you, blogic: Bush is uglier.

How sad.

Cheers,
Daiwa

This is so ignorant...

"I don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. That's kind of one of those exaggerations."

and he didn't, he said:

"I truly am not that concerned about him," ( bold for the BLIND, since I can't do braille for you... )

More blogic propaganda. Bush wasn't wrong, Kerry was wrong. Bush DIDN'T say he wasn't worried, he said he wasn't "that concerned", which, to anyone with a slight grasp of "Ingritch", means he is concerned, but not to an extreme degree.

How pathetic, how blatently fearful do you guys have to be to home in on this kind of thing? It isn't hard to belittle Kerry. By exageratting his importance and his contribution he belittles himself for anyone that looks at him objectively. He's whined about his epic four months in the jungle, misrepresented his position on two wars, done his best to side-step 20 years in the Senate as someone to the Left of The Chappaquiddick Kid, Ted Kennedy...

Come on. If this is the best you can do I'm not all that worried.

worried and concerned are syns.

It does not matter who was right or who was wrong, As far as I am concerned they are both owned by the same people with Bush just being owned by more of them. They are both wrong and at the end of the day it doesn't really matter now does it. All that I can say is that if President Bush is re-elected this country is going to go down the shitter. He can't admit he was wrong, even when he was asked what three things were he would've changed looking back on his term, all he did was mumble (which he is very good at by the way) for two minutes never admitting to any mistaske. Kerry flip-flops. That is the actual best thing that he can do. He can admit when he is wrong, and then take a proactive approach to the situation and change his mind. For the sake of this country, VOTE KERRY.

Lovely blog! It is a very ugly part of Bush's character. And it really comes out in the debates.

Reply #13 By: sandy2 - 10/14/2004 9:07:07 PM Even if John Kerry is elected, if this makes it through then Kerry won't be president for long. Now the e-mail I'm getting ready to post should in no way be considered fact. However I *can* say that the petition is real. Even if the petition gets action to be taken, how has Kerry commited Treason?

Go and read his testimony (1971) before house senate committee. And while you do remember he was still a member of the armed forces.

Sandy, you of all people have no right to say that. If drmiller does this for kerry, you do exactly the same thing for Bush. I said that to Drmiller because in another post he called someone who had the same viewpoint as me a jerk. I said he acted like a jerk in doing so.

And BTW since you weren't the one I called a jerk, what gives?

I was the one you called a jerk. Sandy was just pointing out the fact that you have this proclivity to call people names. It doesn't matter that it wasn't directed specifically at her.
So, I reiterate my comment to you drmiler. Grow the F*** up!!

Reply #21 By: dabe - 10/15/2004 11:48:49 AM I was the one you called a jerk. Sandy was just pointing out the fact that you have this proclivity to call people names. It doesn't matter that it wasn't directed specifically at her. So, I reiterate my comment to you drmiler. Grow the F*** up!!

You know when I first started reading your post I was thinking to myself you should apologize. But after finishing reading I realized you weren't worth it. So I say to you again..... "Shut up!

Reply #21 By: dabe - 10/15/2004 11:48:49 AM I was the one you called a jerk. Sandy was just pointing out the fact that you have this proclivity to call people names. It doesn't matter that it wasn't directed specifically at her. So, I reiterate my comment to you drmiler. Grow the F*** up!!

BTW shows what you know. She was pointing out nothing of the sort. She called me a jerk.:

Reply #3 By: sandy2 - 10/14/2004 7:40:17 PM Bush is a lying fool. Eat your words Drmiller, because every time anything comes up about Kerry you profoundly support it and everytime anything is said about Bush you act like a jerk and start calling people names, flapping your arms about and using mixed up thinking to try to prove to yourself that you are right.

So I say again, what's up?

Reply #21 By: dabe - 10/15/2004 11:48:49 AM I was the one you called a jerk. Sandy was just pointing out the fact that you have this proclivity to call people names. It doesn't matter that it wasn't directed specifically at her. So, I reiterate my comment to you drmiler. Grow the F*** up!!

Just an FYI. I believe ( I could be wrong on this. And if I am I'm sure someone will say something) that you are the only one that I have really called a name. So what does that say about you?

you are the only one that I have erally called a name. So what does that say about you?

Talk about blaming the victim.

drmiller, I have often enjoyed your comments -- even though I do disagree with some of them -- but I'm not sure this is the only time you've done this, and I see neither are you. Maybe you could check and let us know?