erathoniel erathoniel

On Banning Video Games

On Banning Video Games

Why Would You?

    My opinion on banning video games is: "Why?".

    Sure, certain games should be banned *coughmanhunt2cough*, but not all games deserve this fate. Instead of banning video games, why not accurately enforce rating restrictions and piracy prevention laws on the games?

    Why should violent games be banned when more violent movies and books are being made? It's not like I'm trained for a rampage by playing eight hours of Tom Clancy games a day, I'm just trained to play eight hours of Tom Clancy games a day.

    Take games for what they are. Entertainment, not reality.

41,064 views 46 replies
Reply #26 Top

I think the appealable part is a bit bad. If a game's content is so bad it needs banning, the developers shouldn't make the game in the first place.

It should be public, though.

Reply #27 Top
Anyway, I think it is true that kids imitate a lot of what they see. I have seen kids playing video games and imitating them. Luckily they weren't violent ones.


Yeah...back in the day of Mario on the ol' SNES I just couldn't stop jumping up and hitting my head on bricks, jumping on mushrooms, smacking turtles around, and watching coins pop out of their ass all the while sporting a very thick and luxurious mustache. :D

~Zoo
Reply #28 Top
For the sake of argument, there was a lot of death in Speed Racer. (Heck, at least three cars explode during the theme song!)
Reply #29 Top
That new Speed Racer movie looks pretty gay, just like the cartoon. The guy who plays the main character looks like he has mental issues when he's driving.
Reply #30 Top
"That new Speed Racer movie looks pretty gay,"

I think it looks dumb, too. I'd see it in Imax, though...
Reply #31 Top
That new Speed Racer movie looks pretty gay,


Glad I'm not the only one that thought that.

~Zoo
Reply #32 Top
Glad I'm not the only one that thought that.


A lot of people do, so we aren't alone.

We will never be alone, however, if Hillary Clinton wins, and orders a domestic eavesdropping program. The horror!
Reply #33 Top

The new Speed Racer... not even the Matrix guys could save it.

Unless Neo starts gun-fighting across the road and Smith takes over all the racers.

Reply #34 Top
Unless Neo starts gun-fighting across the road and Smith takes over all the racers.


Who's Neo?
Reply #35 Top
Actually current studies show that seeing and acting out violance increases the chance of experiencing agressive feelings. Not to mention that with games becoming more and more realistic they are becoming training engines for anyone who ever wishes to know how to kill someone. Another fact is that playing violent video games is corelated with later violent behavior and delinquency.

Although games will probably not be banned here in the US, seeing as it will violate several parts of the constitutio, games and gaming companies will start to experience a lot more stringent rules as to the design of their games.
Reply #36 Top
Unless Neo starts gun-fighting across the road and Smith takes over all the racers.
Who's Neo?

How's that rock you've been hiding under? :)
Reply #37 Top
Actually current studies show that seeing and acting out violance increases the chance of experiencing agressive feelings. Not to mention that with games becoming more and more realistic they are becoming training engines for anyone who ever wishes to know how to kill someone. Another fact is that playing violent video games is corelated with later violent behavior and delinquency.


Perhaps for some weaker minds. Frankly, blowing people's heads off and stealing their car is indeed quite fun...on the TV screen. I honestly couldn't will myself to do it in the real world. I find slaughtering things in a virtual world quite calming, actually. Let's out all that aggression you build up from dealing with stupid people. :D

Crazy, violent people exist no matter what.

~Zoo
Reply #38 Top
Crazy, violent people exist no matter what.


Thats true, its just that politicians dont understand that. Its because they are all rich and tucked away in mansions, tucked away from real life. Thats why they are so ignorant.
Reply #39 Top
Thats true, its just that politicians dont understand that. Its because they are all rich and tucked away in mansions, tucked away from real life. Thats why they are so ignorant.


I very much agree.

~Zoo
Reply #40 Top

Down with politicians! Put me in instead?

Reply #41 Top
Down with politicians! Put me in instead?


What would you do?
Reply #42 Top
Thats true, its just that politicians dont understand that. Its because they are all rich and tucked away in mansions, tucked away from real life. Thats why they are so ignorant.


Politicians make their money and position from those who take what they say at face value, and actually think they mean what they say :LOL:

It is exceeding rare that any political statement can be judged by its up front content, thats the last thing thats behind its purpose.

In business the phrase "well thats a nice experience, but show me the money Harry ...."

In Politics its "well thats a great statement and innovative policy your expounding, now where are the votes in this ...." It sure as hell is not what was said up front, just ignore that nonsense.

Regards
Zy
Reply #43 Top
Actually current studies show that seeing and acting out violance increases the chance of experiencing agressive feelings. Not to mention that with games becoming more and more realistic they are becoming training engines for anyone who ever wishes to know how to kill someone.


I'd like to see the studies, its been my experience most such studies are looking for a particular answer and aren't designed too well, and never look beyond the answer they are trying to find. I'll take real world large scale and historical examples over some poorly designed study of a 1000 people any day. Not saying they're wrong, but history seems to fly in the face of what they are saying and they make no attempt to take it into account or explain it away.




Another fact is that playing violent video games is corelated with later violent behavior and delinquency.


first off, correlation does not equate to cause and effect. And its spelled with 2 r's.

Secondly, I seriously disbelieve this statement. I'm willing to gamble that the number of players of violent video games that are non-violent exponentially outnumber those that are. Violent behavior also correlates to breathing air. I'm sure, in just eh same way, the number of non violent people who breathe air exponentially outnumber the amount of violent people who breathe air. *Probably by the same percentage!*

Of course those who do commit violence in the U.S. comprise of a surprisingly large percentage of gamers. I don't doubt this. And that percentage is probably growing rapidly. But you know what else is growing just as rapidly? The number of gamers amongst non-violent people. As the number of people in general who play video games increases, you'd expect both these other numbers to increase correspondingly.

I'm also willing to gamble that all sorts of things have *stronger* correlations to violence than video games, much stronger. Abusive parents. Restrictive religions. Alcoholism. Being poor. Living in neighborhoods and going to schools that already have a lot of crime. But when we're trying to ban video games, we do a study on video games, then stop conducting any further studies on anything else, because the last thing we want when we announce our findings is a comparison of how much more other things correlate to violent behavior.

1 study, conducted in a vacuum, out of context of all the other variables that affect the people involved, is of no worth. It might still be right, by coincidence, but it isn't real science. No effort is made to identify, rule out, and compare to the other variables.


Although games will probably not be banned here in the US, seeing as it will violate several parts of the constitutio, games and gaming companies will start to experience a lot more stringent rules as to the design of their games.


You're probably right, unfortunately. I'm an adult, however, and I should retain the right to decide for myself what I want to play, even if it does correlate w/violent behavior. I retain the right to become a religious extremist, I retain the right to be poor, to move to a crime-ridden neigborhood, to go to crime ridden schools, to do drugs, to become an alcoholic, but if we ban doom 3 then despite all that, I'll be mr. happy. Ridiculous.

Reply #44 Top

I'd not ban video games if you elected me as President. Plus, I'd fix the tax system.

Reply #45 Top
I'd not ban video games if you elected me as President. Plus, I'd fix the tax system.


Good. Get rid of the IRS while you're at it, too. Those damn big wigs take too much of your hard-earned cash, and jail you if you complain. Bitches...
Reply #46 Top

I was thinking just sales tax. It would provide an incentive to invest, and allow small-timers to sell their goods at competitive prices, because they wouldn't need to bother charging for the sales tax. Basically, you go to the grocery store, you pay tax, go to the farmer's market, no tax.