God damn stupid Lefties

I understand completely how you are feeling!

*grin*

I think I'm way guilty to the other side, picking on those I deem to be "righties."

So, it's ok when Kerry says (on the record) that "Bush lied", then says in a public debate between himself and Bush that (paraphrasing) 'lieing is a strong word, I wouldn't use that word' when asked if he has called Bush a liar?

It's ok when Soros, Michael Moore, etc., call Bush a hate monger, war monger, Nazi, and other hateful words?

It's ok when people call our president a moron, dumb, dimwitted, or other similar words?

It's ok when the main stream media with their liberal bias concoct stories and make up proof for their accusations?

It's totally not possible that people like Bernard Goldberg and many others are correct in their proofs of a liberal bias in the media?

And yet, when people who claim to preach tolerance and acceptance are found to be the ones spreading the hate and starting the name calling, it's bad because it hurts your feelings?!?


There are reasons why the conservatives look at the liberals and think that they are hypocrites, but unfortunately the Kool-aid that many of the liberal persuasion is drinking has so numbed their brains that they can't see beyond the fog enough to step out and really see their behavior for what it is.

The media is NOT "leftie" in any way. Murdoch's group is the epitime of "rightie-ness" as some would put it. And i'm sorry for ranting but I have had it.

Aren't there other news outlets besides FOX News?

Check this article out for some discussion about bias in the media. It's quite interesting:

Survey Finds Angst-Strained Wretches in the Fourth Estate

A joint project by the Pew Research Center and the Project for Excellence in Journalism reveals a darkly pessimistic view of the profession among its own members, often echoing the criticisms of the public at large. The 55 percent of national journalists, and 37 percent of local ones, who see the media as soft on Bush may well be reflecting their own views of the president. At national outlets, 34 percent describe themselves as liberal, 54 percent as moderate and 7 percent as conservative. (The local split was 23-61-12.) Nearly 7 in 10 of the liberal national journalists criticized the Bush coverage.

and

The survey confirmed that national journalists are to the left of the public on social issues. Nine in 10 say it is not necessary to believe in God to be moral (40 percent of the public thinks this way). As might have been inferred from the upbeat coverage of gay marriage in Massachusetts, 88 percent of national journalists say society should accept homosexuality; only about half the public agrees. In a related finding, 31 percent of national journalists now have a great deal of confidence in the public's election choices, compared with 52 percent at the end of the Clinton administration. The clear implication is that many media people feel superior to their customers.

With those kinds of numbers and results, the conservative side is supposed to feel sorry about who is throwing what punches at whom?

I've taken to calling myself "one of JU's Tokyo Rose Commies" after reading WF's article on being called Tokyo Rose...

I actually got an e-mail the other day that referred to me as the blogosphere's version of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. I was very amused.

And yet, when people who claim to preach tolerance and acceptance are found to be the ones spreading the hate and starting the name calling, it's bad because it hurts your feelings?!?

I think what sandy2 is speaking to in this article is the fact that when someone in the media with a left-leaning slant to them says something controversial, then its not just that one person who gets bashed but the ENTIRE Left.... when the Democratic party does something objectionable, its rarely said that it was just the Democrats, it was "the Left" that did it.

Sandy2,

You reap what you sew! I have tolerated your left wing lies and nonsense when you respond to my posts. I usually get a good chuckle out of reading your naive, gullible, hysterical political rhetoric.

Yes, sandy2, you DO indeed have a "special purpose" in JU.........to provide COMIC RELIEF for us "righties".

I am going to cut and paste your little rant and send it to all of my "right wing neo-con" friends. It's always fun to send them examples of a left wing, bed-wetting, booger-eating, naive, gullible, whining Kerry lover.

If I don't have the opportunity to talk to you before November 2nd, just let me offer you my CONDOLENCES in advance for John Kerry's LOSS in the election. Try again in 4 years with Billary.

Sandy; Don't take it so personal!! Its a damm shame the people in power [ politicans] don't take issues as serious as you do,WOW!! we would have a much better country,but then they are only allowed what their allowed to hear and say. Be cool kid, your great!

The media is NOT "leftie" in any way. Murdoch's group is the epitime of "rightie-ness" as some would put it. And i'm sorry for ranting but I have had it.

I dont paint with a broad brush, but then I dont listen to rants without basis. Tell me next that Dan Rather is un-biased.

Why dont you take pride in the fact you are liberal? Why does it get to you when someone calls you that? is there a negative stigma attached to it, or are you just embarassed to be associated with the likes of Michael Moore and George Soros?

In the end, you have to ask yourself - What is your problem? No one is calling you Hilter or Mussolini.

But we have been called morally bankrupt at one time amongst other things AS A GROUP here....

And being on the left has always had a "stigma". When someone uses the phrase "a card-carrying member of the ACLU" or just "liberal" as a form of derision, then yes, there is a stigma....

I don't know how liberal became a bad thing in American politics, but it did.

Come on, Conservative is spit here like a curse. No one is abused worse for being a Leftist than the rest of us do for being a "Neo-Con" or Capitalist.

Like I said on another blog, feel free to come in incognito sometime and write a right-wing, free market espousing, anti-Kerry article and then try and pretend that Democrats have it tough here.

I'm about as hard on those who lean Left as anyone, and as far as I know I am only blacklisted by a couple of wackos that barely get by here without getting banned. I think the average Liberal here knows, even if they won't admit it, that they dish out the abuse as much as their political mirrors...

So, it's ok when Kerry says (on the record) that "Bush lied", then says in a public debate between himself and Bush that (paraphrasing) 'lieing is a strong word, I wouldn't use that word' when asked if he has called Bush a liar?

See.. they were being civil... just like Bush said it was not his place to judge Kerry's character. Expect this to change in the debate tonight after the hostile VP debate.

It's ok when Soros, Michael Moore, etc., call Bush a hate monger, war monger, Nazi, and other hateful words?

No, calling anyone a nazi is not ok. Other hateful words might be ok, like calling someone stupid, because stupid is an interpretation, but I think we all know what a nazi is and that does not compare to someone being called stupid.

It's ok when people call our president a moron, dumb, dimwitted, or other similar words?

Yes, although I don't agree with them and I would be perfectly fine with Bush ranting about that, although I do question his judgement.

It's ok when the main stream media with their liberal bias concoct stories and make up proof for their accusations?

No, although if you are refering to the CBS issue, then you will see the difference is that the "concoted" story involved a faulty source on what is considered to be a true statement, which has not been properly reuted by anyone.

It's totally not possible that people like Bernard Goldberg and many others are correct in their proofs of a liberal bias in the media?

Sure it is. Many things are possible. I just don't agree with them.

And yet, when people who claim to preach tolerance and acceptance are found to be the ones spreading the hate and starting the name calling, it's bad because it hurts your feelings?!?

It does not hurt my feelings. I am not hurt by words, nor am I even upset as I pointed out, but rather frustrated that often you can't hold a proper conversation because of the nonsense that is thrown at you.

There are reasons why the conservatives look at the liberals and think that they are hypocrites, but unfortunately the Kool-aid that many of the liberal persuasion is drinking has so numbed their brains that they can't see beyond the fog enough to step out and really see their behavior for what it is.

This is the kind of nonsense I am talking about, though I am trying to discuss this with you anyway.

Aren't there other news outlets besides FOX News?

Yes, but I don't consider them (with the exception of PBS) to be so severley biased. I admit CNN is left leaning, but ABC and NBC are pretty straight.

With those kinds of numbers and results, the conservative side is supposed to feel sorry about who is throwing what punches at whom?

I guess I didn't see what your numbers were proving.

I actually got an e-mail the other day that referred to me as the blogosphere's version of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. I was very amused.

Believe me, I find some of this very amusing too.

I think what sandy2 is speaking to in this article is the fact that when someone in the media with a left-leaning slant to them says something controversial, then its not just that one person who gets bashed but the ENTIRE Left.... when the Democratic party does something objectionable, its rarely said that it was just the Democrats, it was "the Left" that did it.

Yes, sort of. I am saying that I wish we could keep this nonsense out of it entirley. I also consider myself independent minded, and am not ashamed to be liberal, though I am not comparable to Hitler or anyone else I have been compared to.

You reap what you sew! I have tolerated your left wing lies and nonsense when you respond to my posts. I usually get a good chuckle out of reading your naive, gullible, hysterical political rhetoric. Yes, sandy2, you DO indeed have a "special purpose" in JU.........to provide COMIC RELIEF for us "righties". I am going to cut and paste your little rant and send it to all of my "right wing neo-con" friends. It's always fun to send them examples of a left wing, bed-wetting, booger-eating, naive, gullible, whining Kerry lover. If I don't have the opportunity to talk to you before November 2nd, just let me offer you my CONDOLENCES in advance for John Kerry's LOSS in the election. Try again in 4 years with Billary.

Normally I wouldn't do this, but I do believe the expression is you reap what you sow. Now that we have that taken care of, your post is another example of the nonsense we could do without.

Sandy; Don't take it so personal!! Its a damm shame the people in power [ politicans] don't take issues as serious as you do,WOW!! we would have a much better country,but then they are only allowed what their allowed to hear and say. Be cool kid, your great!

Thank you.

I dont paint with a broad brush, but then I dont listen to rants without basis. Tell me next that Dan Rather is un-biased.

No, I just think the media overall, with all the sources, is balanced because we have the left and the right wings which keep it balanced, much in the way the CBS hoax was found.

Why dont you take pride in the fact you are liberal? Why does it get to you when someone calls you that? is there a negative stigma attached to it, or are you just embarassed to be associated with the likes of Michael Moore and George Soros?

I am proud to be liberal, Just not to be compared to Hitler which I have been. I think George Soros is doing a good deed by the way, as is Michael Moore, though I don't personally adore them.

In the end, you have to ask yourself - What is your problem? No one is calling you Hilter or Mussolini.

I have been called Hitler, along with a terrorist.

Capitalist.

I consider myelf to be capitalistic, whats wrong with that?

Oh, come on, you haven't seen the long rants about how Capitalism is evil here? If I had a dime...

Well, capitalism isn't a wholly Right-oriented thing either.

No, although if you are refering to the CBS issue, then you will see the difference is that the "concoted" story involved a faulty source on what is considered to be a true statement, which has not been properly reuted by anyone.

Considering it was obvious to anybody but the most radical leftists that the memo was fake, there was no excuse for them to defend the story for that long. Even FOX News had the balls to immediately apologize when a fake story was posted about Kerry, even if the gist of it was true, and they're the bad guys because of it?

Yes, but I don't consider them (with the exception of PBS) to be so severley biased. I admit CNN is left leaning, but ABC and NBC are pretty straight.

I guess if a news outlet shared my biases, I wouldn't think of them to be as biased as one that holds opposite biases.

Oh, come on, you haven't seen the long rants about how Capitalism is evil here? If I had a dime...

Indeed. There's plenty of posts about how uncompassionate conservatives are because they prefer private charity, no living wage, and self-reliance to government welfare.

Sure, some of the things said to members of the left are uncaleld for, and you shouldn't be called Hitler or a terrorist, but just as many things, if not more, are said about those on the right. Those on the right, especially Christians, are called hateful, racist, sexist, ignorant, Nazi, etc.

Sure, some of the things said to members of the left are uncaleld for, and you shouldn't be called Hitler or a terrorist, but just as many things, if not more, are said about those on the right. Those on the right, especially Christians, are called hateful, racist, sexist, ignorant, Nazi, etc.

If you are racist then you are racist, it is not limited to being conservative. Some conservatives are racist though, because of the fact that affirmative action and other things that are anti-racist are liberal ideas, forcing them to become conservatives.

So a lot of people write articles calling the Right all those things.... and not just Bush or his administration for instance.... articles that have titles like "The

"Some conservatives are racist though, because of the fact that affirmative action and other things that are anti-racist are liberal ideas, forcing them to become conservatives. "

Zoinks!

I don't think your concept of affirmative action is universal, so I wouldn't try to paint people who oppose it as leaning toward racism. Many people, myself included, think some aspects of affirmative action itself are racist...

Demicans and Republicrats arguing over who calls who names more, now this is comedy.

Though I admit the Republicrats use some harsh terms, the harshest terms come from the Demicans, after all Draginol(Brad) did get called a Nazi for no sane reason at all.

Though if we want to get technical we could start counting up the number of times, one from the Demicans, one from the Republicrats, and one Independent, to form a council to count up the number of times what side calls the other a harsh term or harsh comparison, would be interesting to see which side has more violations would it not?


- GX

"So a lot of people write articles calling the Right all those things.... and not just Bush or his administration for instance.... articles that have titles like "The of the Right" or "Conservatives are "? "

Absolutely, man of these ignorant jerks don't realize that when they say that "Neo-Cons" are evil or are destroying the world, or are worse than Husein, blah, blah, blah, they are talking directly to the kinds of people they are talking about. It happens on both sides, granted, but those on the Left most always try to pretend that they are talking about some abstract evil somewhere else...

Yes, but I don't consider them (with the exception of PBS) to be so severley biased. I admit CNN is left leaning, but ABC and NBC are pretty straight

No they're not. They are as left leaning as the rest. They wouldn't miss a *chance* to bash Bush.

To play the devil's advocate, you don't have to be left-leaning to insult or unfairly criticize the President. The mainstream press is so unscrupulously self serving and hate-mongering that they would pick apart any sitting official. It isn't much of a scoop to say "The President is doing a great job, nothing further to add...". Honestly, they will have a field day with Kerry if he is elected, I think.

That's not to say some aren't biased. Many, though, are just hateful and self centered enough not to care who they smear, as long as the outrage they spur makes them money.

Yes, but I don't consider them (with the exception of PBS) to be so severley biased. I admit CNN is left leaning, but ABC and NBC are pretty straight No they're not. They are as left leaning as the rest. They wouldn't miss a *chance* to bash Bush.

but then, who wouldn't