Too Little, Too Late Obama

This morning, Obama is set to give a "major" speech.  No doubt this is political damage control regarding his association with anti-American and racist Wright.  Well as they say, it's too little too late.  Obama has been associated with this man for many years, and the only time Obama wanted to distance himself is when Wright becomes a political liability.

People aren't buying the story that Obama knew nothing of Wrights beliefs, and it seems many are finally realizing that Obama is not the "savior" that many proclaim.  For the hardcore Obama-bots, they believe anything he says, but for most Americans he is now showing he is a true politician.

I don't know how this will affect the democrats little war they have for the nomination, but this has definitely put a big dent in votes for the general election.  He's going to give a speech today that appeals to minorities and will try to get sympathy from others.  Don't buy it folks.

 

 

16,018 views 33 replies
Reply #1 Top

You have to love it when the politicians have to make "THE BIGGEST SPEECH OF THEIR LIVES TO SAVE THEIR CANDIDACY".  That's always interesting.  In a few months, it will be a tiny blip.  Hillary is still my homegirl.  I'm hoping this helps her. 

Reply #2 Top
Checkers, anyone?
Reply #3 Top
I hear he's also flip flopping on this. First he said he never heard the comments of his pastor, now he says he did hear "some" of it. It seems Obama is not as different as one is lead to believe.
Reply #4 Top
I'm hoping this helps her.
End of quote


So are many Republicans. At this point, if Hillary gets the nod, there is going to be civil war in the party.
Reply #5 Top
Obama is so damaged at this point, we could probably win the election with Huckabee. You don't win elections when your surrounded by race militants and 'God damn America' types.
Reply #6 Top

You don't win elections when your surrounded by race militants and 'God damn America' types.
End of quote

It all depends on how many people actually remeber this when the voting rolls around and if Obama can put a proper spin on this to make it seem as if he was not at fault. It also depends on how willing the candidates are willing to sling dirt over this and how effective they are at doing it. Politics are and were never based on facts but rather image or what you seem to be. You could be the worst crook in the world but with a staff of spindoctors and a lot of funding you can survive alot of things that probably should have pulled you down. Though from what I have read about this pastor its going to be pretty interesting to see if Obama can get through this one without losing voter confidence...

I just don't see this having as great an effect as some of you guys make it out to be and even though Hillary is slated to lose against McCain by current poles if she gets the nomination that can all change and in all honesty If I have to chose between two evils I'd rather have Obama in the big oval office than Hillary. Though I hope that McCain will get it and also hope that his vice president is someone who is REALLY a conservative because if he kicks the bucket because of old age (which may be very likely) I want someone who I'd actually want to vote for to be in office.

Reply #7 Top
Don't portray audacity of hope: most, especially pundits, will give him a free ride. [See my article on the speech :NOTSURE: ]
Reply #8 Top

Obama is so damaged at this point, we could probably win the election with Huckabee. You don't win elections when your surrounded by race militants
End of quote

Yes he is damaged, no doubt about.  But remember he has the support of the far left, which caters to "victims", "race militants", and pretty much anyone who hates America.

 

Reply #9 Top
I heard several people calling in the morning show saying pretty much the same as the title yet the guy from the radio show felt the need to defend his comments over and over.

Reply #10 Top

I don't know CNN, NBC, and other are STILL enamored with Obama. According to their comments you'd think he gave the modern version of the Gettysburg Address or I have a dream speech. Basically he accused everyone else’s pastor of doing the same thing, and placing his grandmother and Geraldine Farraro in the same racist league as the "Reverend" Wright. I suppose nothing rubbed of from his mentor or 20 years. For the believers, a simple question, what flavor of kool-aid is it?

Reply #11 Top
Island dog honestly i feel you might in fact be threatened by the fact that Barack a black candidate rather than a democrat please correct me if im wrong but im sure your aware that Hilary is also running for the presidency but yet i here no commentary on her character and political strategies... And as far as sympathy goes please tell me you are not one of those people who live under a rock and believe that race relations in the United States is a concoction or fabrication used by people of color to gain "sympathy" as you so gently put it from there white counterparts....Open your eyes its one thing to support a candidate and dislike there opposer's views its another to bash a mans character, religious beliefs and political campaign because of your own deep rooted hate or fear of the unknown whether you like it or not their's a change in the winds and Barack will not be the last person of color to run for presidency mark my words
Reply #12 Top
But remember he has the support of the far left, which caters to "victims", "race militants", and pretty much anyone who hates America.
End of quote


Yes, but the election will be won by moderates and independents who are now disgusted by Obama's refusal to condemn 'Pastor' Wright.
Reply #13 Top
i love how everyone knows exactly who's going to win... This has to be one of the most close minded group of people i've ever seen did this blog start at a right wing convention????
Reply #14 Top
es, but the election will be won by moderates and independents who are now disgusted by Obama's refusal to condemn 'Pastor' Wright.
End of quote


Operative word, now. The Democrats have followed the lead of our lady of dirt, Clinton and are airing each others' dirty laundry now. McCain is still relatively clean, but his turn will come closer to the election than the Democrats'.

Will the voting public remember the dirt of the Democrat campaign, or will they think more often of the fresh dirt unearthed on McCain? Polling and basic psychology suggests the latter.
Reply #15 Top
I don't know CNN, NBC, and other are STILL enamored with Obama. According to their comments you'd think he gave the modern version of the Gettysburg Address or I have a dream speech.
End of quote


I like this--you're right on target. The pundits act like puppy-love-struck children. ;) 
Reply #16 Top

Island dog honestly i feel you might in fact be threatened by the fact that Barack a black candidate rather than a democrat please correct me if im wrong but im sure your aware that Hilary is also running for the presidency but yet i here no commentary on her character and political strategies...
End of quote

I don't care what color Barak is, I'm more concerned that is one of the most liberal Senators, and what looks like an interest in Marxism.  See, this is what is going on, anybody who is against Obama must be a racist or threatened by race.

 

And as far as sympathy goes please tell me you are not one of those people who live under a rock and believe that race relations in the United States is a concoction or fabrication used by people of color to gain "sympathy" as you so gently put it from there white counterparts....
End of quote

Are you telling me people like Obama don't use their race and their so-called "disadvantages" to get sympathy?  You must be the one living under a rock if you don't see how democrats use the race card at every chance they get.

 

 

 

Reply #17 Top
Island dog honestly i feel you might in fact be threatened by the fact that Barack a black candidate rather than a democrat please correct me if im wrong but im sure your aware that Hilary is also running for the presidency but yet i here no commentary on her character and political strategies...
End of quote


It would be strange to discuss Hillary's defects in an article on Obama. Perhaps if you read more you would see lots of articles on her defects here? This is a thematic article, not a unabridged analysis of the current election. Learn the differnce.

And please, take your race card home. Obama is a candidate for president. As such, he is subject to the SAME scrutiny as the other candidates, and subject the same faux pas'. The only racist in this whole circus this year are the ones that demand Obama be treated differently BECAUSE he is black. Better check the mirror.

i love how everyone knows exactly who's going to win... This has to be one of the most close minded group of people i've ever seen did this blog start at a right wing convention????
End of quote



No one does. At this point it is all conjecture. But now the thought police have decreed that conjecture is illegal. Dont you love how liberals try to stiffle free thought and speech under the guise of political correctness?
Reply #18 Top
Here is my issue with the Obama-Wright thing....

I have no problem really with what Wright has said. I disagree with him, and greatly at that. But, he has a right to say whatever he wants to say, I guess.

My problem is that a man who is very very close to becoming President of the United States, a man who wants to run this country, is so closely related and intertwined with another man who outright HATES America. The fact that there are so many ppl who cannot understand why there is a problem there startles me. Here is a man who has aligned himself with another man who preaches hatred towards a country that the first man wants to control. If he wasn't so close to attaining that power, it would be humorous. But instead, it is pretty damn scary.

Again, Wright has the right to say whatever he wants. And, Obama has the right to align himself with him. I disagree, but that is what being human is all about. But, why are so many so awestruck by him? It is frightening, really. He has had issues in the past where he was looked at as "hating America"....and now this with his pastor of 20 years....and still, nobody really sees anything wrong here.

I have been called a racist before. I have had black friends in the service question me as to if my railroader (Dad's side) and coalminer (Mom's side) ancesters ever owned slaves. I have been called some "nice" names from certain members of other cultures. But I honestly do not believe that I am racist. My dad, a devout Democrat (I have explained that elsewhere) routinely refers to members of the black race as the "word that shall not be spoken". Personally, I hate that word, and refuse to say it even in chatter about someone else using it. And to be lumped into the "White Man is a Racist" bucket is personally offensive to me, but Wright does have that right to say that crap. But, again, my issues are not with Wright, exactly. It is with Obama being so closely aligned with the man.

Chris
Reply #19 Top
Polling and basic psychology suggests the latter.
End of quote


You are probably right. That is why the democrats always wait until the right moment to spring their october surprises. Too fresh in the minds of voters to forget, and not enough time to deflect the attention from it.
Reply #20 Top

I think it's pretty funny the double standard that exists here.  Now, I don't condone Wright at all.  But he gets the appropriate label of racist, but last week, Ferraro was just 'telling the truth'.

Reply #21 Top

I think it's pretty funny the double standard that exists here. Now, I don't condone Wright at all. But he gets the appropriate label of racist, but last week, Ferraro was just 'telling the truth'.
End of quote

What they are said are two different things. 

Reply #22 Top
I think it's pretty funny the double standard that exists here. Now, I don't condone Wright at all. But he gets the appropriate label of racist, but last week, Ferraro was just 'telling the truth'.
End of quote


It would seem to me that you don't really understand the meaning of the word racist or racism. I'll help you out though, it's always good for people to have a firm understanding of the meaning of certain words before they blurb things that later embarrass them.

racism (the prejudice that members of one race are intrinsically superior to members of other races) http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=racism

Last I saw Ferraro was not putting Obama down because he was black, she said he was gaining ground because he was black which in a way she is right. Part of what makes Obama so appealing is that he's Black, Black people are voting for him because he is Black, White people are voting for him because they're afraid to be seen as racist, Hispanics are voting for him because they see themselves in him as a minority, young people are voting for him because they think he's cool. The one thing they all have in common is that they see Obama as change (imagine having the first Black President, that alone is tremendous change). Now if you ask them what kind of change chances are most will not really know what Obama will bring, all they know is that it has to be better than Bush.

On the other hand here you have a "Paster", a man of God, Daming his own country, his own people. Saying that Black people suffer because of White people, that Black people are still being duped today as they were back when they were slaves, that slavery still exist in this country. I can not understand why anyone who thinks they are still being treated badly, are feeling like slaves, hate everything about the country they live in and still live here? If you think this place is that bad, why don't they leave?
Reply #23 Top
Could anyone actually believe that Ferraro is a racist? While I do find it somewhat entertaining to watch Democrats tear each other apart with baseless accusations of racism, its also quite ridiculous. If Obama doesn't mind publicly accusing his own 'white grandmother' of racism, he sure wont have any problem doing it to Ferraro. If Obama would do this to his own grandmother.... think of what he'd do to us.
Reply #24 Top
“Don’t tell me words don’t matter.” … Barak Obama

Context… “the parts of a discourse that surround a word or passage and can throw light on its meaning” or “the interrelated conditions in which something exists or occurs.” At least this is what Webster seems to think.

A more cynical view, a’la Ambrose Bierce, might suggest a more literal meaning these days could be… “Those interrelated elements and facets of verbal or textual discourse typically omitted or included as necessary to convey a thought, meaning or intent grossly divergent from that actually spoken or written.”

“….. taken out of context.”, has now become so common a political refrain that one begins to question whether we are any longer capable of meaning what we say or saying what we mean. Mustering all the sincerity possible into a straight face, looking eye to eye and guilelessly mouthing the words, “You took my words out of context.”, will likely not get you out of a traffic ticket, or save a failing career… or even repair a troubled relationship. But, it sure seems to be the favored choice of excusing spoken ignorance and textual insanity these days.

Presidential hopeful Barak Obama has now made what appears to be a sincere, noble and, certainly, a very well spoken attempt to reset the context of Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s impassioned stupidity. In disavowing the divisive and ignorant remarks of his longtime pastor, friend and confidant, Mr. Obama has included many idealistic truths, personal and family confessions and has even reached out to white America in acknowledging the evils inherent to the failures of affirmative action. Candidate Obama has now publicly condemned the raging insanity and ignorant hate speech of his good friend, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, but has declined to cut him loose to the whims of history. But not before attempting to excuse this man’s perfidious, divisive and hateful hyperbole by suggesting the genesis of this stupidity was the context of an America in the fifties and sixties.

There are millions of us living today that were children of the fifties and sixties and shared the good and the bad of those times with the good Reverend Wright. In the fifties, along with four siblings, I was raised an Army brat on a military post in west central Georgia along the Chattahoochee River. We attended Don C Faith Elementary school on post and I cannot recall a single class where black children were absent or a little league ball game where the prowess of my team mates, black and white and Hispanic and Asian and even East Indian… ever failed to inspire me to greater efforts. Regardless, I will concede there are other millions that did not share the wonderful bounty I enjoyed as a child of the time.

It is not Candidate Obama’s choice to remain tethered to the stupid ignorance of his Pastor that troubles me as a voting American. It is the deafening silence from his congregation and a responsible American media that troubles me most. It is the revelation that twenty years has passed and it is only now that Candidate Obama feels a compulsion to speak out for reason, understanding and change. And I feel some regret that his speech merely raises more questions. The picture of Candidate Obama standing idle before the National Anthem, sans salute, is now seen in an all new context. An even more curious question is whether the foolish ignorance of the good Reverend Wright might provide a more revealing context for Michele Obama’s remark that, “… for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback.” Who’s brand of hope is that, Barak’s… or the good Reverend Wright’s?

Well… as a Caucasian American centrist, I am offended. While I cannot help but agree that we need change, this is not the change for which I had hoped. Perhaps we need to distance ourselves from the persistent stupidity, rank ignorance of hate speech and cut it loose forever to the file cabinets of history.

Perhaps we need to stand together as Americans and point in raucous laughter and ridicule in the strongest, broadest context possible, all those impassioned fools who would abandon hope and positive change; who would summarily discard common sense, common decency and the common good; and embrace and perpetuate the same tired old raw hatreds, prejudice and bigotry we heard so loud and clear in Wright’s impassioned sermons. It is not the context of the sermon that’s troublesome, it is the unambiguous clarity of the message.

This is not the time and there is no excuse for it!


Reply #25 Top
Dr Guy i resent being labeled as a liberal....I merely was asking a question
unlike others im open-minded to opinions that may not be mine intially.