McCain:Don't Get Cocky

note to McCain Supporters

John McCain, remember the Colorado Rockies. A long layoff can lead to a sweep by a well-toned Democratic candidate who's been through the wars of campaigning.

196,532 views 131 replies
Reply #1 Top

Cocky he can get. He is going to be the next President--no contest!

Reply #2 Top
Cocky he can get. He is going to be the next President--no contest!


Well, I wont go that far, but it does seem his to lose this year.

It seems everyone ran to the left this year. Unfortunately, the democrats fell of the edge of the playing field.
Reply #3 Top

He is going to be the next President--no contest!
Yeah, right. Be prepared for the multicolor alerts to blare every day.

 

democrats fell of the edge of the playing field.
Neither Obama nor Clinton are left enough for me. But what does an old FDR demo know.

 

Reply #5 Top
I think this one would make a great choice as Vice President


Which one? Egos will interfere, but I think Hillary will be Veep. IN which case, I am investing in a life insurance policy on Obama - for my retirement. ;)
Reply #6 Top
Which one? Egos will interfere, but I think Hillary will be Veep. IN which case, I am investing in a life insurance policy on Obama - for my retirement.


Doc, remember the book the presidents plane is missing? This time I think it will head into the Bermuda triangle and never be found. Oops. :LOL: 
Reply #7 Top

I think this one would make a great choice as Vice President and then we can really put the partisanship aside.

Ouch, a peacenik and a hawk locking horns.

I think Hillary will be Veep
No, this is her last chance for the presidency. If the next election will be in 2116, she'll be too old. As for an insurance investment, don't count on it--even Hillary wouldn't want the legacy of becoming the first woman President because some idiot shot down Barack.

Reply #8 Top

Why can't I get a yellow face w/o the hieroglyphics?:SNIFF!:

Reply #11 Top
--even Hillary wouldn't want the legacy of becoming the first woman President because some idiot shot down Barack.


YOu do not understand power and its narcotic power then.

And 2116? Damn! You think she is going to be around a long time! ;)
Reply #12 Top
but it does seem his to lose this year.


If he is confident its because Republicans are already skilled at the theft of elections. Only this time they won't have the criminal supreme court to manufacture a faux justification for the outright theft of the Presidency like they did for the Bush junta in 2000.

Reply #13 Top
If he is confident its because Republicans are already skilled at the theft of elections.


Sorry folks but I was in Vegas on vacation the last week or so and seeing this reply I have to answer it.

JFK stole the election from Richard Nixon and no one said a peep. It is well documented but still no one wants to speak ill of the dead. He was so unpopular that he had to go to Texas, a democrat strong hold at the time, in order to have a chance at re-election. It was common knowledge that President Kennedy used he father’s ties to organized crime to fix the election. Bobby Kennedy then turned around and attacked the people that put him in power setting the stage for the presidential murder in Dallas, dear sweet innocent Bobby had thrown so much political mud that Mr. Nixon was forced to retire from public life until the Kennedy’s were out of power. When Mr. Nixon was elected he did the exact same things that the Kennedy's did but he was vilified for it and no one mentioned that President Kennedy’s Attorney General pulled FBI files and used them to smear political enemies or had an enemies list. Any thefts of elections were learned from the democrat party.

Shall we look at Illinois politics the last half century? A state with the un-official motto of “Vote early, Vote often”. A state where you can count on 150% of registered voters turning out for elections, dead people voting for decades and the like.

How about Miami Florida where democrats are caught with voting machines and blank ballots in their cars and no arrests are made, that was the 2000 election so even with the cheating that was going on the democrats still lost and because they lost scream foul, and that the election was stolen. Or how about when the current laws and rules were not advantageous to the democrats so they hire a bunch of lawyers to try to fix the elections of 2000 and 2004 and when it does not work then they again scream fraud.

Please show me where the Republican Party has shown a half century of fraud in elections, show me republicans that have done the above things. You can’t because it never happened.
Reply #14 Top
no contest!


So Republicans are relying on Bush canceling the election and appointing McSame. That would be the only way McSame will ever be President.
Reply #15 Top
So Republicans are relying on Bush canceling the election and appointing McSame. That would be the only way McSame will ever be President.


I don’t think that is what was stated, were you out the days they covered reading comprehension in primary and secondary schools?
Reply #16 Top
I don’t think that is what was stated, were you out the days they covered reading comprehension in primary and secondary schools?


It also points out her stupidity. If it is true that "it is the only way" that McCain will be elected, then she is admitting that the democrats are trying to illegally fix the election. Not unprecedented for them, but it shows how she cannot even keep her lies straight.
Reply #17 Top
were you out the days they covered reading comprehension in primary and secondary schools?


Actually given Bush and The Republican party's love for fascism I unfortunately think there is a high degree of probability that Bush will attempt to cancel the elections. And undoubtedly you and the other brownshirts on this forum would celebrate him doing so.
Reply #18 Top
If it is true that "it is the only way" that McCain will be elected, then she is admitting that the democrats are trying to illegally fix the election.


Dr. I wishIwasaguy that was a retarded statement even by your imbecilic standards. My comment was simply based on the inarguable fact that there is no way that McSame will be elected unless the Republicans try to find another way to have an activist supreme court decide the election again.

Reply #19 Top
Dr. I wishIwasaguy that was a retarded statement even by your imbecilic standards. My comment was simply based on the inarguable fact that there is no way that McSame will be elected unless the Republicans try to find another way to have an activist supreme court decide the election again.


No, your statement just demonstrates your lack of reading comprehension, lack of writing skills, lack of debating skills, lack of intelligence and lack of ethics. And your lack of maturity since you apparently cannot even read names correctly.

basically it is a reflection of you. Not anyone else. And how democrats steal elections, not anything the republicans do. You made the statement. You can either retract it, or defend it. But you are only defending the illegality of the democrats, and as I said, your own stupidity.
Reply #20 Top
basically it is a reflection of you.


That I prefer actual elections despite the Republican party's efforts at voter suppression and election theft?

I know that you are upset that despite the efforts of your lord god GW people are still allowed to vote for something other than the political expediency of your republican overlords, but TOO BAD.
Reply #21 Top
That I prefer actual elections despite the Republican party's efforts at voter suppression and election theft?


Cant read can you? I guess even vegetables dream.
Reply #22 Top
guess even vegetables dream.


So you do dream. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize to any vegetables insulted at being compared to you.
Reply #23 Top
So you do dream. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize to any vegetables insulted at being compared to you.


Do you have any better ones than "and sos yours". Even your attempt at insults is on the level of vegetables. What do you do for an encore? Julianne?
Reply #24 Top
Do you have any better ones than "and sos yours".


But you have already been proven incapable of comprehending anything beyond monosyllabic words, if I used anything else you would have to go ask your nanny to explain them to you and I don't feel like waiting for your sniveling response.
Reply #25 Top
But you have already been proven incapable of comprehending anything beyond monosyllabic words, if I used anything else you would have to go ask your nanny to explain them to you and I don't feel like waiting for your sniveling response.


YOu really are monotonous and quite lacking in intelligence. Go play with the other morons. You have proved you cant hold a conversation, much less an intelligent one.