As I said on another blog, it isn't his expression that I find dishonerable. It is the bending of truth, the "movement" to effect the overall will of the people. He didn't just express misgivings, he used the tactics of a propagandist to propel himself politically. They weren't satisfied to organize dissent. They wanted to take matters into their own hands and effect change whether the government willed it or not.
It is a fine line to tread. There were no doubt excesses and abuses. Perhaps the situation there was obviously misrepresented. The fact is, though that that happens in every war. His efforts were not of someone who wanted to educate the public, they were aligned against the government with the intention of robbing them of public support.
Had that behavior been limited to Vietnam, I might be more apt to say it was genuine, but he has continued that kind of treasonous tactic to this day. His "quagmire" rants are irrepairably destructive, and his insult to the current leaders in Iraq are worse. At every opportunity he tries to gut the ability of President to gain support for the effort.
His behavior after returning from Vietnam doesn't cast doubt on his behavior now, it is the other way around. I was a third party in terms of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, but Kerry's behavior in the last two weeks has done more to cast a shadow on his denials than anything they could have presented.
| "So, when you say Kerry was dishonorable in what he did, I can tell you he was in the great majority of soldiers in terms of the way they felt. " |
I think that is a vast overstatement. I have known many Vietnam Veterans, and while they were angry that they were often kept from doing their job and many think the war was poorly led, none of them considered it an unjust war. They saw the horrors being perpetrated by the North Vietnamese, and they saw themselves as a hedge against it. People like Kerry, though, spent their time hamstringing the government, making them afraid to commit out of fear of their treasonous dissent.
You gut the power of a President by subverting the public will, making them afraid of every hint of a mistake, and then when they don't do enough, you call them on that too. Kerry's ilk are why we can't deal with terrorists in Iraq once and for all, and have to half-ass it.
If he wins, he will be a vastly unpopular President, if for only the fact of the bed he has made himself regarding Iraq. He'll inherit a war that he himself has poisoned the American people against, and he'll have no will to finish it,and will crawl from it in shame.