| We'll just have to wait for CBS's document experts to come forward |
cbs evening news tonite (9/10) exhibited a document previously released by the whitehouse as part of the official bush service records which very clearly had a similar superscript 'th' (some sort of payroll thing) and rather says there is yet another one dated 1968 that also has that superscript thing.
like i said on another thread (and crispe mentioned earlier in this one) ibm selectric machines were capable of superscripting like that according to my sister who typed 100s of dissertations using one during the years 1969-1972. proportional font elements were not terribly exotic.
aside from those considerations, why did the whitehouse release copies of the same documents without comment once theyd seen them (cbs faxed them to the whitehouse prior to that broadcast). why no whitehouse denial as to their authenticity? karl rove took the week off?