Does ANYONE have a plan for Iraq?
*raises hand timidly*
from 
JoeUser Forums
JoeUser Forums
I don't claim to be any expert on foreign policy but it would seem that violence is perpetuated by political lines being drawn which encompass opposing factions. (Feel free to say "Duh.")
For example:
Israel/Palestine and the Gaza strip
Chechnya and Russia
Hutus/Tutsis in Rwanda and Burundi
Shiites/Kurds/Sunnis in Iraq
It would seem that most of these situations are exacerbated by geographical lines. Generally, one side seems to be dominant and force or oppress other factions into abiding by the ruling or more powerful faction's laws. No one likes to be oppressed (yet again, duh). So the point of this article is to try to figure out what to do with Iraq and its factions.
The U.S. has been mired in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict for ages and it does not seem to be going away. There seems to be a similarity with the situation in Iraq, and I wonder if it's not solvable by dividing the factions somewhat geographically and grouping them loosely together as territories or states (perhaps more independent than, say, the U.S. states).
Take this map for example:
Couldn't state lines be drawn, and Iraqis can (but do not have to) live in the state that is culturally relative to themselves? For example, the Kurds would be in a Northern state, etc.
The U.S., however, is historically bad at drawing lines. Take a drive through Washington, Oregon, and Idaho some time and check out the land taken from the Native Americans as compared to the land given to them for their reservations. So doing this would require an international alliance and cooperation--and especially the Kurds, Shiites, and Sunnis themselves. (And anyway, the U.S. needs to start diminishing its role and let the Iraqis do more--it is their country, after all.)
If each Iraqi state had its own governing system analogous to international penal systems (i.e. you don't chew gum in Singapore and you don't cut off thieves' hands in the U.S.), they could be based on their own religious beliefs, insofar as necessary. Sunnis would be responsible to behave respectfully in the Kurdish state, and vice versa. I suppose it would have to be somewhat democratic in that each state would be represented in some kind of senate, at the very least. Perhaps also a president--I haven't fleshed it out that far.
Now before you dismiss me as being all idealistic, are there any better ideas? 'Cause I haven't heard of any ideas to solve this from anyone in the Bush administration, the Kerry campaign, the U.N., France, no one. All I want is to get done what needs to be done, not bicker about it like politicians trying to get elected.
For example:
Israel/Palestine and the Gaza strip
Chechnya and Russia
Hutus/Tutsis in Rwanda and Burundi
Shiites/Kurds/Sunnis in Iraq
It would seem that most of these situations are exacerbated by geographical lines. Generally, one side seems to be dominant and force or oppress other factions into abiding by the ruling or more powerful faction's laws. No one likes to be oppressed (yet again, duh). So the point of this article is to try to figure out what to do with Iraq and its factions.
The U.S. has been mired in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict for ages and it does not seem to be going away. There seems to be a similarity with the situation in Iraq, and I wonder if it's not solvable by dividing the factions somewhat geographically and grouping them loosely together as territories or states (perhaps more independent than, say, the U.S. states).
Take this map for example:
Couldn't state lines be drawn, and Iraqis can (but do not have to) live in the state that is culturally relative to themselves? For example, the Kurds would be in a Northern state, etc.
The U.S., however, is historically bad at drawing lines. Take a drive through Washington, Oregon, and Idaho some time and check out the land taken from the Native Americans as compared to the land given to them for their reservations. So doing this would require an international alliance and cooperation--and especially the Kurds, Shiites, and Sunnis themselves. (And anyway, the U.S. needs to start diminishing its role and let the Iraqis do more--it is their country, after all.)
If each Iraqi state had its own governing system analogous to international penal systems (i.e. you don't chew gum in Singapore and you don't cut off thieves' hands in the U.S.), they could be based on their own religious beliefs, insofar as necessary. Sunnis would be responsible to behave respectfully in the Kurdish state, and vice versa. I suppose it would have to be somewhat democratic in that each state would be represented in some kind of senate, at the very least. Perhaps also a president--I haven't fleshed it out that far.
Now before you dismiss me as being all idealistic, are there any better ideas? 'Cause I haven't heard of any ideas to solve this from anyone in the Bush administration, the Kerry campaign, the U.N., France, no one. All I want is to get done what needs to be done, not bicker about it like politicians trying to get elected.
PolMach Forums