ShadowWar ShadowWar

OK what part of "all" don't they understand?

▼

OK what part of "all" don't they understand?

All means all and even

from JoeUser Forums
Ok Folks I have been watching CNN while sitting in my hotel room, nothing else to do right now, and all they are talking about is the ads again. President Bush has called for an end to them, "all of them". The Kerry gang keeps calling for the President to condem the ad of the Swift Boat Vets, and he has so why do they keep asking?

Here is what he said on camera and for the record:
While being asked about the 527 ads. One reporter cited the swift boat ads and asked, "When you say that you want to stop all --" "All of them," Bush responded. "That means that ad, every other ad. Absolutely. I don't think we ought to have 527s."

OK now someone tell me what part of that statement is not clear? I am at a loss. How can they still be saying that after he said what he did? Come on folks educate me.
international
10,739 views 30 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top
Diawa makes a good point. Very few local TV stations are running this ad. It wasn't until the Left started spewing outrage that it even because a "headline" story. I think most people would have given it a harumph and moved on, but every single day Kerry has to say something else about it.

Maybe he should just leave the SBV to their opinion and MoveON? If Bush isn't talking about it, and the press want to leave it behind, the only reason for Kerry to dwell on it is to turn it into an attack against Bush.
Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top
Kerry's folks seem to think they've found the Holy Grail and that by continuously and repeatedly shining their big bright light on it, it will work to their advantage. Hate to admit it, but they may be succeeding to some extent. Heard about a poll put out today (sorry, can't say whose) indicating that more people are inclined to believe the Bush campaign is "behind" the SwiftBoat vets now that Ginsburg (sp?) has resigned from the campaign. Never mind that several attorneys are playing the same dual role with the Democrats and, of course, have given no thought to resigning.

Sigh...

Cheers,
Daiwa
DeskScapes - Bring your desktop background to life.
Reply #28 from PolMach Forums Top
Funny that people are complaining about Kerry repeating a topic over and over again to help him in his campaign when it is a common thing for Bush to do. 'Iraq has weapons of mass destruction', 'Kerry is a flip-flopper', '..just shows he is not in the mainstream of america'...i've heard all of these continuously from Bush...so big deal, Kerry is using the 'repeat message until it sinks in method'..good for him. Perhaps, yeah, if the press wouldn't have jumped in on the swift boat vet ads and made a big deal of it, it would have passed over..but I'm certain that those ads of course were placed in very strategic places where Kerry needs to win so it became a bigger deal to him. Anyway..there you..

Oog
Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top
Funny that people are complaining about Kerry repeating a topic over and over again


Funnier still that what Kerry's complaining about over & over again is that a topic is being repeated over & over again. Ain't politics the sweet science?

Cheers,
Daiwa
Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
Wesley Clark, today, AFTER Bush commented on Kerry's record:

""I think that it's outrageous that the president of the United States can question the medals and the service and the valor of American veterans who have served," said Clark, a retired four-star Army general. "It's offensive against every veteran in this country.""


That is about as heinous as it gets, an out-and-out lie. At one time I had respect for Wesley Clark, but now in my mind he's a big for a tool as Dean, Gore, or any of the rest of them...