Draginol Draginol

Voting Trends and Economics

Voting Trends and Economics

Tax payers vote Republican, Tax receivers vote Democratic

Vote by Income All Gore Bush Buchanan Nader
Under $15,000 7 % 57 % 37 % 1 % 4 %
$15-30,000 16 % 54 % 41 % 1 % 3 %
$30-50,000 24 % 49 % 48 % 0 % 2 %
$50-75,000 25 % 46 % 51 % 0 % 2 %
$75-100,000 13 % 45 % 52 % 0 % 2 %
Over $100,000 15 % 43 % 54 % 0 % 2 %

Funny thing about numbers and what they mean.

Take this exit poll from CNN from the 2000 election. Overall, the voters are about even.

Most people who make less than $30,000 a year do not pay any federal income tax.  You may pay some at the time but you get a tax refund at the end of the year.  As someone who supports progressive taxes, this doesn't really bother me -- though I do think everyone should have to pay a certain flat fee so that they feel the pinch of what supporting expensive and wasteful federal programs means.

If you take out those two groups, you have 23% of the voters (at least) who pay no or virtually no federal income taxes.

So if you break it out like that you end up with:

% of pop Gore Bush
Not paying income tax 23% 55% 40%
Pay income federal taxes 77% 44% 48%

If one translates this to political party, you get an interesting picture. People who don't pay federal income taxes tend to vote for Democrats. People who do tend to vote for Republicans.  And in fact, the more taxes you pay, the more likely you are to vote for Republicans.

There are lots of conclusions one can draw to put either side in a negative light.  But it is an interesting fact how this works out.

Each side can charge the other side with "greed".  The rich want to keep more of their money.  The poor want more of someone else's money. 

My view is that the rich have a responsibility to their country to pay a greater burden of the taxes. The rich didn't get rich magically. They got rich largely thanks to the country we all built together.  However, at the same time, those who aren't paying into the system should quit bitching about how "the rich" aren't paying enough or that they're getting off easy.

11,513 views 27 replies
Reply #26 Top
Personally I'm inclined to distrust the Rush Limbaugh site about as much as I distrust the Mike Moore site. Do you have another source for your figures?

Also the 96% figure includes the top 50% of the population. This suggests a very serious rich/poor gap which must be worrying to the average citizen. Continuing to work off generalisations, if the poorest 50% don't earn enough to account for even 5% of the tax payments, they're unlikely to produce many college graduates and high-wage earners, which will only lead to increased stratification of the economy and society. This can't bode well for the future.
It's strange that they think the Democrats are going to do a better job though.
Reply #27 Top
the raw data used in the rush link is located on the IRS website:

http://www.irs.ustreas.gov/pub/irs-soi/01in01ts.xls