COL Gene COL Gene

Bush in Search of a Positive Lagacy

▼

Bush in Search of a Positive Lagacy

from JoeUser Forums


I hope the conference today will begin a process that will lead to a settlement of the Israeli/ Palestinian conflict. However one can not fail to look back at the past 7 years of inaction by Bush.

Bush is trying to salvage something that he hopes future generations will look upon as a positive accomplishment of his 8 years in office. To date the only issue that is a positive accomplishment is the agreement with North Korea to end their nuclear program.

This will be the last chance Bush will have to get a process started that could lead to a settlement during his term. How much better of a chance would he have had if he had tackled this issue 7 years ago?
politics
11,018 views 37 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top
it is like this


Hitler had the Jews


the democrats have the rich and white men. white women don't count.
Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 28, 2007WHY did Bush not allow the use if this system UNTIL AFTER 9/11? it wasn't needed before 9/11why didn't clinton.and when clinton called the taliban what do you think the taliban did.


That is not correct. Clinton warned Bush in December 2000 that Ben Laden was a problem. The CIA warned Bush for 6 months before 9/11 that bin Laden was planning to attack the U.S. Tenet tried to get Bush to allow the use of the Predator and Bush DID NOTHING but sit on his ass!
DeskScapes - Bring your desktop background to life.
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 28, 2007it is like thisHitler had the Jewsthe democrats have the rich and white men. white women don't count.


And you are full of BS!!!!! Bush has the poor and middle income to abuse!
Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top
I have the hookers and EEEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWW man. I'm just sayin', that's all.
Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
The issue is that if he had acted 7 years ago there would be a lot better chance of success!


No Col, the issue is that this will not be resolved any time soon. You seem to believe that a group of people who have been waging this war for nearly a century, raise their children to hate the Jews and will stop at nothing short of nuclear weapons, are somehow gonna have a change of heart and forget of past conflicts and become good buddies with Israel. You are definitely is a state of denial and that state is on another planet.

Bush is the last person in this world we should expect to accomplish any kind of peace between these 2 cultures without killing no less than 50% of the population of both countries.

I don't even know why we are involved in the conflict (apart from being allies with Israel) when the rest of the world and many American citizens believe we should not stick our noses in other peoples businesses anyways. Sounds like hypocrisy is once again the word of the day around here.
Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top

The Borg is a GREAT description of Bush-- DO IT HIS WAY DO NOT THINK[/B]-- that is what anyone that follows him must do! Many on this Blog site fit that mold!


Trust me, Bush and the Borg have nothing in common.
Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top
Clinton warned Bush in December 2000 that Ben Laden was a problem.


Oh, how nice of him.  You would think after being attacked in '93 he would have done something by then.  But I forgot, this is your chance to blame Bush for something.


Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top
You would think after being attacked in '93 he would have done something by then



he did he lobbed some missiles into some empty camps
Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Thursday, November 29, 2007Clinton warned Bush in December 2000 that Ben Laden was a problem.Oh, how nice of him. You would think after being attacked in '93 he would have done something by then. But I forgot, this is your chance to blame Bush for something.


You would think Bush would have done a LOT MORE after being warned by both Clinton and the CIA. He did NOTHING until AFTER 9/11 and then he attacked the WRONG Country!
Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top
you would have thought that clinton would have had or would now have a back bone. but he and she doesn't.
Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top
by the way gene al quida had set up a training camp in iraq in 2002. i believe that was before we attacked iraq.
Reply #37 from JoeUser Forums Top
You would think Bush would have done a LOT MORE after being warned by both Clinton and the CIA. He did NOTHING until AFTER 9/11 and then he attacked the WRONG Country!


Oh please gene.  You would have been the first person complaining that Bush was overstepping if he attacked any country or person before Sept. 11.  There were failures all around, but nothing Bush would have done would have stopped Sept. 11.  Get over your obsession.