Hillary Clinton's Fear Responses.

The venire is cracking.

http://www.angelfire.com/psy/jesseledesma/
Before I start today I just want to mention that I heard reported today that this year the USA became first on the list of economically competitive countries.

Ah, this is interesting. I thought America was suppose to be going down the wrong road and in need of change.

If you listen to the democrats, that is the impression you will get.

Last night in their debate, all I heard was that Bush and Cheney have taken this country down the wrong road and there is a need for change.

Well I must not tell a lie. I only saw about twenty minutes of the debate. The rest of my information I got from reports on the debate.

My intention was to see it all. However, when I tried to search for it on the MSNBC web site again I could not find it.

It does not matter, though. One reason it does not matter is that I am not rooting for a democrat. They can duke it out for all I care. Two, it does not matter because; I rather know what the republicans have to offer.

I still see Thompson as the one who can build a coalition of the winning.

The liberal news is fanning the political fires of Giuliani, however, in my opinion.

Well, I can here today to talk about one significant impression I got when watching Hillary Clinton.
Many of her responses were laden with fear responses. These responses are cracking voice, slurred speech, anger, watery eyes, and red face.

When I noticed these responses, I started wondering what she could be afraid of at the debate.

Could it be she is afraid people will start to see her lies? Maybe she is afraid that people will see she is not fit to be the president of the United States of America.

I still contend that she will not be nominated. Just last month I was reminding myself that a big cheese in the Democratic Party said Hillary is to ugly to be elected.

Imagine some one in your own party making comments such as these about you.

I think he is right. When people started talking about Bush’s replacement over a year ago, many said it was to early.

I say all this time has served well in showing how unattractive Ms. Clinton is for the presidency.

She lies better than a woman. All she can do is paint things in the negative. In addition, she wants people to think she would be a fierce defender of America. However, she claims all of who are concerned about militant Muslims are just imaging the threat.

How many times did she voice the word diplomacy? Is this the same diplomacy her and her husband used when they gave away American nuclear secrets to North Korea?



6,883 views 20 replies
Reply #1 Top
How many times does it have to be proven that mainstream media does NOT have a "lefty" slant before you idiots start to believe it?

They're supporting Guiliani because he's the best Repub for the job. Thompson sucks ass, Jesus, and couldn't win this election if his life depended on it.
Reply #2 Top
What does Hillary fear? Straight Answers, Follow up questions, standing by her words, a press that may someday start doing their job, and people discovering that her only claim to fame is who she is married to.

Last night in their debate, all I heard was that Bush and Cheney have taken this country down the wrong road and there is a need for change.


They are taking the country down the wrong road... for Hillary, the wrong road is prosperity while a Republican is in the White House.

How many times does it have to be proven that mainstream media does NOT have a "lefty" slant before you idiots start to believe it?


I'm waiting for a shred of evidence to the contrary, much less "proof".
Reply #3 Top
Jesus,

Don't write about things you don't fully understand unless you can spell even the simplest of words. Such as "too."
Reply #4 Top
Jesus can't spell, "too"? ;~D
Reply #5 Top
Or imagining. But here's proof...

a big cheese in the Democratic Party said Hillary is to ugly to be elected.


Emphasis added.
Reply #6 Top
Cumchunk

~Zoo
Reply #7 Top

It does not matter, though. One reason it does not matter is that I am not rooting for a democrat. They can duke it out for all I care. Two, it does not matter because; I rather know what the republicans have to offer.

three, it don't matter if you aren't legally able to vote.

Reply #8 Top

I still see Thompson as the one who can build a coalition of the winning.

and i still see him as someone who goes outta his way to avoid anything more strenuous than running a tab.

Reply #9 Top

She lies better than a woman.

???

while that observation don't make much sense, it  shonuff do offer a disturbingly candid peek into your twisted lil self.

Reply #10 Top
Don't let the egotistical asshats bother you, jesse - em's just words.
Reply #11 Top
Don't let the egotistical asshats bother you, jesse - em's just words.


Yes, by all means - ignore the fact that every argument you make is "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing" and continue in your blatant ignorance of what real life (and real political debate, for that matter) are supposed to be like.

Please, keep it up - I need my daily gigglies.
Reply #12 Top
So far I don't see much discussion on Jessel's points. I just see a lot of mindless blather about typos and her age.
Reply #13 Top
So far I don't see much discussion on Jessel's points.


If ever, in his entire life, he made a point worth discussing, I'd take up the cross.

Since he never, ever has, I'll stick to making fun of the retard.
Reply #14 Top
Looks like you've earned the title of "Fair Game," SanChonino. Screw you and may you forever be ignored.

Adios, and have a great day "making fun of retards." Talk about the kettle calling to pot black.
Reply #15 Top
hold on a second fellas.

none of this sprung into existance fully formed within the last couple hours. there's more than a lil bit of history here.

less than a week ago good ol jessedwannabeanglo had no problem visiting my most recent article (in which i very generously provided the gop a very practical strategy for quelling its impending value voter mutiny) to publicly denounce me as a 'mullifier' actively working to demean, devalue, diminiah and defile ju.

i'd suggest you spend a lil time familiarizing yourselves with his output but i won't unless you can look me in the eye and assure me you're equipped with approved hazmat gear.
Reply #16 Top
Screw you and may you forever be ignored.


Same back to ya, asshole. If you want to stand up for this idiot's indefensible positions, more power to you. Whip just explained why Jesus deserves nothing but derision - but hey, if you like the sweet stench of hypocrisy, keep calling Jesus Lopez-Ledesma your friend.
Reply #17 Top
And here I always thought he was a she. Not sure why, maybe when I first read his articles he came across as a girl. Oh well.

He despises Mexicans, and has made many racially bigoted remarks about them on past threads.


Ouch, I mean I have said some bad things about my people, Puerto ricans, but not to this point of despising them and making "racially bigoted remarks about them". I mean they may be dumb sometimes, but they still me people.

Can we track this clown down thru his IP Address and have immigration throw him back over the fence and raffle his PC here in JU?
Reply #18 Top
Did you know Jesse uses Mexican jumping beans to power his PC and Salsa to cool his CPU?
Reply #19 Top
This is why, with a few exceptions, my responses are usually to the article instead of the blogger. As Sabrina pointed out so well, I really don't know who this Jesseledesma person is, I just wondered why the discussion turned so much about him instead of the topic and points of the article.
Reply #20 Top
Same back to ya, asshole. If you want to stand up for this idiot's indefensible positions, more power to you. Whip just explained why Jesus deserves nothing but derision - but hey, if you like the sweet stench of hypocrisy, keep calling Jesus Lopez-Ledesma your friend.


Has nothing to do with sympathy, friendship or with defending anyone's position - only with needlessly abuseful language. Do whatever you want.

LW - you know me; not defending the person here. Subject matter & presentation of the post didn't seem to warrant abusive responses, at least to me.